jayturley

Sir, this is a Wendy's

With streaming balkanized into so many individual providers, it's hard to pay for more than a couple.

So the Grandson has learned to discriminate ads from content, and as soon as an ad comes one, we all chorus, "Stinky Ad!" and then everyone rushes to be the first person to get to the remote and skip it.

It's not a perfect solution, but it's what we have.

No. Wouldn't try it for free.

It's possible there would be a market for this in genres where there is a strong parasocial connection to the author that drives a desire to simulate interaction.

For something factual or scientific/mathematical, I would not want to interact with a nondeterministic pretend version of the author.

Grok is literally built to create nonconsensual porn, so this doesn't seem very surprising to have it sexualize translations.

I plugged the tweet text into Google Translate and it looked just fine. Same with ChatGPT. YMMV

Yep, for-profit healthcare is a bad idea. It's the main reason our USA healthcare costs so much.

It's not the lack of spelling and grammar.

It's the "reduction to the mean" that turns everything into bland corporate-friendly prose like the bulk of the corpus that AI models ingest.

Unironically, this is exactly the state of the world in 2026

My daughter (29) is getting a filing cabinet and pastel folders. And a cute EDC kit with knife, pen, and screwdriver. My grandson (2) is getting books, little people, and a cheap drone that floats and is controlled by hand movements.

As an agency owner, we don't use these tools regularly but we have clients who do, and we support them. As far as the domains, they are a registrar like any other. You can transfer the domains away or to them like any other registrar. This means that the customer "owns" it for the period of time it is registered for with an accredited registrar. The web builder companies do not own it on your behalf.

There are no real SEO penalties, but as with any web property, you have to do the work to get all the SEO working as you want.

As far as benefits for developers, give me an open source tool any day that I can improve on, extend, or mess up with sketchy coding. These tools are meant for consumers to build their own sites for the most part. They represent the initial commodification of "get a website". They are more difficult and/or expensive to extend than a tool like WordPress, Laravel, Hugo, etc. And they are walled gardens, which means they are difficult to migrate away from.

In standard scrum, the Scrum Master is responsible for managing the process around developing software, not for actually estimating, creating features, tracking, etc. A Scrum Master's tasks remain the same regardless of what product is being worked on. A Product Owner would be closer to the role you describe above.

As a SWE who moved to Agile Coach, it can be a fun challenge, but since you aren't actually doing scrum, you shouldn't worry about actually following the full process and instead should think about essentially being a product owner (no matter the title) - the interface between the development team and the customer. You'll want to watch out for you being held responsible for the team's performance instead of the ICs on the team. So some CYA could be in order, even if that's just clearly defining your roles and deliverables with management before taking it on.

As another commenter noted, you should be able to lean on your team for help with things like estimation and tracking, but that really depends on your organization's existing process.

If you look at sprints as a delivery schedule instead of a benchmark for development speed, sure.

Might want to add the year to the movie titles in the autocomplete. In today's puzzle, the title for both the 60s movie and the 2000s movie show up in the list and there's no way to differentiate them other than guessing. I guessed wrong.

Other than that, lovely idea and implementation!

I checked out the site, and if I hadn't known it was a coffee company, I would have thought it was a supplement company. As it was, I thought that this must be coffee with added supplements (which does not appeal to me). It wasn't until I got to an actual product page that I realized that the "supplement" concept was just the branding. If I were simply browsing for coffee, I would have left the site from the home page without exploring enough to understand it's just branded that way.

The home page offers minimal value in understanding the concept. If you had a text section just below your hero that explained why/how you are marketing coffee as a "supplement", it would be extremely helpful. Something light-hearted that hammers home the point you are treating coffee as a supplement. You already lean into it by having supplement info sheets on the product pages, so perhaps below the explanation, you could put some CTAs to drive people to click on/order the coffee. Like, "Looking for sweet flavor with an intense aroma? Try X. Looking for a more traditional flavor? Try Y".

Obviously these are quick off-the-cuff suggestions, but the meta-problem I'm looking at is helping a new visitor understand your branding and aid them to find what looks like really good coffee by easing them into the "supplement" branding concept.

If you're targeting gamers, to me nothing about the site indicated gamer-related or even gamer-adjacent except for the label font. The pictures are all hoodied zoomers. If you want to go after the gamer supplement market, I think you might need a redesign that focuses even harder on the supplement concept (e.g. Kill Enemies Faster! Shave Seconds off your Speedrun!), as the current one feels like it's targeted at higher-end urban professionals and influencers.

I hope any of this is helpful. The social proof makes the product sounds fantastic and I'd love to try it.

Could not agree more. Bought just a low-end cold-water one and it's amazing. I miss it anytime I have to use a bathroom at the office or a public restroom.

So they are surveilling people they know are on the drug, and they are seeing those people buy less food. Wow. The surveillance bothers me a lot more than the fact Walmart might experience a slight downturn in the bottom line. Here's a non-paywalled recap of the story: https://futurism.com/neoscope/walmart-ozempic-food

I'm guessing since many jobs don't let people use their intellectual capacity anyway (think service/retail/food), not much.

I handled this with AT&T by calling customer service, letting them know that the email was wrong, and then when customer service wouldn't do anything, threatened to login, change the password, then cancel all the services used by the person who used my email address. Suddenly they could do something. Never received another mail from that person's account.

I'd open a vegan restaurant/coffee shop with lots of board games and promote the game of Go.

Same kind of capture is done on a lot of utility company payment sites. In NM, many go through Speedpay which charges ~$2/payment and that fee does not go to the utility company; it's just a fee that is passed straight through to the payment provider.

What about "quiet firing" - when a company only pays you what they are contracted to pay you and no more? Why isn't this a bigger thing? /s But seriously, if a company wants more work, they should pay more. Employees shouldn't go above and beyond unless their company is doing the same for them.

The Deed of Paksenarrion by Elisabeth Moon.

Max Tegmark's "The Mathematical Universe". https://arxiv.org/pdf/0704.0646.pdf

Unfortunately, even if the people care, and let their reps know, it doesn't really help. "Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence."

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-poli...

For me, the answer is simple. Democrats are not progressives. The Democratic Party is a centrist party that focuses on neoliberal politics in service to their corporate overlords and the wealthy. As the viral tweet goes (paraphrased):

US Citizens: We'd like Medicare For All!

Republicans: No!

Democrats: No! [pride flag emoji] #BLM #AllLivesMatter

As far as I can tell, the Democrats mainly exist to take 1 step to the left for every 2 steps to the right the Republicans take. It's all still going right-wing and has been for decades. The only current Democrats who are even close to progressive are the Squad and Bernie, and we have seen exactly how much effect they can exert on the Democratic monolith, i.e. not much at all.

So yeah, Democrats often fail to live up to the progressive statements they make and progressive ideologies they claim to hold. While Republicans don't even pretend to care about anyone but the wealthy and corporations. Both sides suck.

#LateStageCapitalism

Example argument: "the reactionary might happily ban pornography while the liberal insists it be shown to grade schoolers".

And that's the quality of this article. Yawn.

Loving that my decades-old arcade skills still work :) Great job!

Not gutting the company quickly enough to satisfy shareholder short-term financial gain.

They've been asking if you want to unsure from unread subscriptions for a while now, and not just political. Anecdotally, I've been getting those notifications for over a year.

From my experience as a scrum master, if there is any micro-managing going on, it's being done wrong. The standup should literally be no more than a minute per person. Each person gets 2-3 sentences: "I did this yesterday. Today I'm working on this. I could use some help with X. (if applicable)"

It's meant to help keep the team aligned on what everyone is doing at a higher level, not for any details at all. After the standup, the team can address any requests for help that came up as needed. But that falls outside of the standup.

Agile is meant to help empower teams and improve their velocity, and that requires people to own their own stuff. So the standup should be a purely informative, high-level overview of where the team is so everyone is aligned. If it's anything more, it will become a cumbersome, painful exercise in micro-management and tangential discussions.

In my experience, people who threaten to get the police involved usually won't. It's usually a threat to cause the exact type of response you are considering - just giving in. The only situation I can think of where they might have a chance is if the customer never used your software after purchasing it. If you have usage data that shows the customer continued using it after purchase, and a communication history that shows no refund was ever asked for, you will likely be okay even if they somehow get this to court. Please note: I am not a lawyer and I am US-based, so this advice may not be useful depending on your location and the legal rules in your country.