jas-

Maybe trying to predict entropy would be easier

Thanks for sharing this

Can you provide correlated events to these? It would certainly help the argument

It's a similar problem the human DNA solved by telling our teenage selves that our parents are dumb and we needed to move to a new tribe. Genetic diversity, but a digital equivalent.

It reads like a Turing test bot doesn’t it? Sus

All one has to do to validate this is to look at their own code to understand why it may look like slop.

Anytime a port, a prototype or any other beta/alpha version of a piece of software is coded, isn’t that what we as humans do already?

To say that a human is any better isn’t sound judgement or logical.

Pretty sure that isn’t the point of using LLM’s

I digress; this article actually has helped identify useful knowledge gaps around topics I have researched. https://drensin.medium.com/elephants-goldfish-and-the-new-go...

While you have to think about things objectively no matter what, when I start researching topics like physics, using AI as suggested in that article has proven very useful.

You need to be able to advertise the networks to each other using a routing protocol such as ospf

The sheer volume of bug reports negates the perceived importance

Yes. It is the equivalent of reading a technical review of a product by the product owner

Thanks for putting this online

Red hat and other RPM based distributions recommended kickstart scripts use tty3 using a similar method

“ The response might've been different if the author had already given a patch”

For a security related issue? Not sure that is a wise decision.

Thanks for providing this!

If we are just going to stigmatize one word, perhaps, as a group, you should also consider the following list and fire people for these as well?

The only real consistent thing is as each generation becomes "woke" or "enlightened" (as previous generations called it), one or more phrases will be termed offensive by the younger generation and changed to something else.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_disability-related_ter...

Great post! Thanks for taking the time to put this up.

What do you think the ratios are regarding improper use of nonce with this mode?

Most implementations that I am familiar with intentionally generate a random nonce to help lower the percentage of app devs doing this very thing

Be worried when laws get passed against barter systems that would circumvent these systems

Doesn't metasploit, OpenVAS and others already do a lot of this? Why not contribute modules there vs. write a new framework?

ARP? Don’t you need arptables for this? OSI model 101

Kruptein: https://github.com/jas-/kruptein

A node.js module which implements a standard API for symmetric encryption and does so by providing the requisite key derivation from a supplied secret, strong key and cipher selections, performs validate then decrypt of cipher text while supporting most language character sets and ASN.1 encoding ensuring compatibility with most if not all database engines.

Used best practices documentation and am currently using famous cryptographers throughout history to name each release.

Example: v3.0.4 Étienne Bazeries - He is best known for developing the "Bazeries Cylinder", and is described as "one of the greatest natural cryptanalysts the science has seen".

A magnet?

Real world metrics on causes. Totals of cases, known vs unknown cases and a percentage associated to each possible cause based on those variables?

Wouldn't this be a "what we know about physics" distillation? I am basing this assumption on the "Raw data" as being that of already performed experimentation etc.

You would think the native DOM parsing engine would be quicker than trying to add another layer of abstraction and parsing which would incur additional overhead

Please enlighten me on the ‘many single points of security failure.’

I would be interested to see metrics on articles involving positive vs negative opinions regarding defense programs.

Now you have a centralized single point of failure. While the ease of use is inherently obvious with the implementation, if/when it does fail you will have to fall back to public key/password auth anyways.

I have not read the details on the bill. However, a quick glance just reminds me of how counter productive and opposite of what our tax paid for research outlines as best practices for protecting data.

The NIST SP 800 series publications were paid for by our tax money and outline how encryption should be used for ALL. Not to mention sets standards for all of the intricacies that come with development, implementation and validation of strong algorithms for use in commerce, medical, federal, military and even GAH personal use.

https://www.nist.gov/cryptography

Why aren’t there lines of effort for hardware manufacturing processes, firmware and logistical supply chains?