jakupovic

Yes

You're getting good advice and the best you can do is say I know better. Learn to be humble and listen to elders.

Promotions are given to people who know other people and will not upset the order.

I read this "useful as automotive feedstock" which still makes sense.

Let me quickly go count my years of experience, will have to use all my digits and extremities, might be a minute.

I don't think you got the point behind the comment. We do not have a good way to quantify effort, thus we ask for a fixed set of time in chairs, tickets closed, etc that's the best we can come up with.

You forgot the IMHO.

He doesn't known what he is talking about. Bunch of wannabe founders waxing BS. If you want 8 hours of guaranteed output use a bot

Yup, short walt to my colleagues who are all spread across the world. /$

First, nobody cares what you want. Second, do you pay for those 4 hours adequately, guess what if you don't? Even if you do, are you OK with 2 hours today and 6 hrs tomorrow? How about a year of 1 hour days and then a 24 hour period that fixes all the problems for last 2 years?

MS said they wouldn't, that's where the conflict arises. The fund doesn't want to be involved with any shady stuff and is trying their "humanity clause".

I wouldn't, that's why there are rules everyone adheres to.

If the 'general purpose compute' is used by rocket, then yes?

So helping with blob storage or not helping at all? Can't be in dual state.

Doing this at anything > 1k nodes is a pain in the butt. We decided to run many <100 nodes clusters rather than a few big ones.

Or simply rich get richer as you put no brake on the wealth.

Prove to me that unicorns don't exist, first level arguments only!

It is not possible to be a member of significant minority, this would be a fallacy. But, I'm not as good as AI in explaining this and thus looked it up in Google: While "significant minority" is not an established logical fallacy, it can be used to commit two related fallacies: the appeal to minority and a flawed variation of the appeal to popularity (ad populum). This rhetorical tactic exploits the audience's biases by using the status of a group, rather than evidence, to argue for a claim

There is no such thing as significant minority. Therefore your argument is predicated on nothing, and a loss of time.

"significant minority of Gaza territory" you obviously don't know what you are talking about.

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/09/israel-has-c...

No they won't.

This is real life not some made up rule book, people like you refer to when faced with things they don't like.

So your experience, which doesn't matter by the way, calls to do nothing. You need to self reflect.

The great @dang has spoken.

I'm back

Lol, tell it how it is. Mofos trying to blame their inactions on others and if that's not enough then talk shit.

column editing

I haven't seen any other editor that comes anywhere near the capabilities provided by VIM. I spend a lot of time manipulating data into columnar form and for anything early vim does it effortlessly.

I would like to know more. For example how did you get the county records?

"People do this, people do that ..." Unless you're speaking from personal experience or have some hard data, you're spewing utter BS, you're doing this now. Teach yourself!

Without reading anything I feel empowered to say: "If you don't want to see something don't look at it"