Pointless economy? Technically Possible!
HN user
iwintermute
The audacity and randomness of it - System of a Down with the lyrics 'I don't think you trust In my self-righteous suicide' in Chop Suey plays fine in the same playlist.
No objections about 'Hurt' by NIN/Johnny Cash also.
Doesn't work in Chrome even after confirming age and accepting that it can contain 'topics related to self-harm'
Great new feature! Such impact! Happy perf!
I know it's off-topic but maybe "MAANG level app" >> "MANGA" if we want go there?
I've got 001 model and like it so much that getting 100 as the second one.
there're conversions kits: https://youtu.be/VZws7kE3U5k
I feel like if you have to hide your face behind the mask - there's no need to be present in the office at all. Video call would actually be better.
have you seen HandMadeHero? https://handmadehero.org/
Plus what do you mean by coding games specifically? Is it game engine programming? Game design? Or other related stuff?
It's solving 'mechanical' problem. The optimistic twist on this helper is that it just raises the bar - human programmer should better be more useful than 'brainless' code generator - meaning not only being able to write a loop or solve leetcode task, but also understand context and what he's trying to solve for.
As you say typing code is not a bottleneck for problem solving
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_room_design
There're definitely cases when devs avoid even looking at implementation before creating their own
So if it was trained using "source code from publicly available sources, including code in public repositories on GitHub." was it also GPLv2?
So everything generated also GPLv2?
I feel like it would be great open source product idea
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp6_3UQLi2Y
Steve said it best.
my Beyerdynamics comes with ability to switch cables and they also sell components for repair. So designed to be fixed
RTS game on gamepad. That would require proper 're-imagining' - I guess that's why there're only artsy menus to show for
there's https://github.com/3b1b/manim created and used by https://www.3blue1brown.com/
"Even though it was discovered by physicists, it's not a physical theory in the same sense as electromagnetism or general relativity. <...> Quantum mechanics is what you would inevitably come up with if you started from probability theory, and then said, let's try to generalize it so that the numbers we used to call "probabilities" can be negative numbers."
because "Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media"
You might want to look up what was up with Cambridge Analytica - Michael Lewis has one of episodes in Against the Rules (podcast) - it's a good place to start.
There was nothing at all. No predictive power. Total waste of money and it's funny this example keeps coming up
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMN17uBzCw4
Very insightful interview with Ray Dalio
Yeah, just remember what those pesky unions did to german automakers
he also had another talk https://www.infoq.com/presentations/Design-Composition-Perfo...
and I would argue there's idea that simplicity of the instrument/tool is not a problem in itself and we shouldn't lose it in pursuit of 'ease'
"people with depression and similar mental health problems aren't welcome at Stripe"
That an interesting question. Would you like to work in a tandem with a person with mental health problems? Is it the same as asking "people with chronic fatigue and similar health issues are not welcome at company specialized at manual labor" ?
It's more valuable in terms of exploitation vs exploration [1] -- i.e. it's more important to do what you know you like and not just patiently spend time on something you don't
Alphabet (and not Google) is actually trying to be like berkshire hathaway - conglomerate holding company (at least according to Eric Schmidt)
Same reasoning can be applied to Magically Better Administrators
I've read that Bezos doesn't allow power point at all - only prose. Apparently no one has time for slides and oral presentations
AlmostTotallyNewthon would be better, correct. Would shift discussion from 'upgrade' to 'migration' without all the usual cries. Other than that it's understandable that some architecture decisions from 1991 haven't aged well.
That's why it's called Python 3 and not Python 2.x
Think about it like totally new language