HN user
Why do we have to “ML” everything? A simple database query should provide good evidence.
I’m confident that a significant portion of problems that ML is applied to today can be solved by some Excel sheets.
FYI, pigeon dishes feature in a number of Michelin star restaurant menus.
Million guesses per second vs thousands. Really interesting how SHA3 made its way to this blog post.
Worth noting that the CC in London operates for 15 years now. I’m sure there is a wealth of data that can be analysed, and I’m even more sure that there are a number of studies and papers that have explored its usefulness and positive/negative impact on traffic/economy/environment/public transportation.
Not really sure why people are downvoting without providing their side of the argument. Your point is valid.
There is definitely a portion of people that this applies to. However, I’d wager that the majority of the Cryptocurrency market capitalisation is from people that really want to become millionaires really fast.
We deal with this almost every week, as in, we get into systems by searching through email:password leaks and use them.
There are a number of mitigating controls that can be applied here. Most will hamper usability, some will not.
There is a “simple” solution. Enforce 2FA. If not at the login, then before “dangerous” actions (transfer funds , change password , buy X/Y/Z )
“There’s a couple of good options (and this is not an exhaustive list) for pre-made tool VMs. Obviously you have Kali Linux for offensive tools and penetration testing, but you can also use Security Onion for the defensive side – intrusion detection and network security monitoring.”
Seems like it’s there.
I catch myself internally debating this from time to time.
On the one hand, we are encouraged to make decisions based on facts/data/evidence. Speculation is speculation. Anything goes.
On the other hand, if we only do this we are bound by the “reality” that has been provided to us. No evolution/revolution can occur.
History is filled with documented cases of these “conspiracies”.
I’d be really interested in hearing other peoples’ views on this.
London has a 30-40x.
50k salary 1.5-2mil GBP for a well size 2 bed in a good area.
You will have to factor in the 4x associated costs as well (fuel, maintenance , flight crew, airport costs, etc).
I have 0% knowledge on commercial flight OPEX, but at first glance it doesn't sound as simple.
Google news alerts. Alternatively you can pay someone to do it for you.
I mean, apart from the moral issues here, what you are doing is illegal.
And that's fine, if it wasn't for the fact that your HN profile advertises your business.
Do you also do this to your clients?
If I'm not mistaken, he was comparing the stolen amount to the entire market cap of ETH (currently 19bil), to make it sound like it was a small amount.
You did the math, seemed small to me but that's how many seconds it takes to make 600 , assuming ~900 mil profit per quarter.
"It appears that alternative power sources including batteries and a diesel generator may also have failed."
So yeah, its was all down to the fault of one single person. Sure :)
I like this. I would love to see this being used in APT data exfiltration / DLP bypasses.
If your threat model includes 3 letter agencies, the short answer is that you cannot.
I was about to comment something similar , but then I saw your post. Btw I don't know why people are down voting it.
This is an important point. This research comes after 10 days of the leak. I have been following the leak closely, I've even compiled a list with all the analysis and resources on a gist.
Good guys, bad guys, kids, bored Blackhats, had enough time to practically follow the step by step instructions in order to implant the backdoor. It doesn't take more than 30-40 mins for the first read till a successful exploit.
The short answer is that we have no idea of knowing how many of those were backdoored by the NSA.
Also worth noting is that the leak happened 3-4 months ago. A lot of people had access to this privately.
Yes, just after the no-breathing option.
I'm hoping there is an invisible /s there.
Same thing applies today. Just fire up a DO instance and tail -f access.log
You will see random scanning attempts within minutes. Same principle , minus the effectiveness.
And you can always store your DB in a "cloud" drive. This is what I do and I'm fairly happy with it. Granted it doesn't have the features and ease-of use of online password managers, but my workflow allows me to live with that tradeoff.
You are missing a middle ground alternative, keepass stored in OneDrive/Dropbox
This is crazy. A vast majority of people working in my industry (infosec, most of us write tools that can be used for good/bad) should be behind bars if you follow that logic.
Brit on a corporate O2 mobile. Archive.io is for some reason blocked for under 18s
Hmmm can't seem to find your email in your profile. I think you have to put it in the about section.
Right on the money with the "Real World" anecdote.
We do penetration tests for a wide range of clients across many industries. I would say that the bigger the company, the more childish flaws we find. For sure the complexity, scale, and multiple systems do not help towards having a good security posture , but never assume that because you are auditing a SWIFT backend you will not find anything that can lead to direct compromise.
Maybe not surprisingly, most startups that we work with have a better security posture than F500 companies. They tend to use the latest frameworks that do a good job of protecting against the standard issues, and their relatively small attack landscape doesn't leave you with much to play.
Of course there are exceptions.
I get that we have to be open with tech. After all most tech seemed "impossible" "unrealistic" and "unfeasible" even a couple of years before they go mainstream.
But you have touched some use cases that are more frequent than most people think. London is a great example. My hometown Athens is much more closer to London as far as driving is concerned as opposed to LA or NY. I guess many other metropolis also.
How will AI brand A communicate with AI brand B about life critical decisions ? Hey we can either both crash to each other or kill that kid on the pavement. ( just an example , I don't want to go to the morality of the situation)
I assume there is going to be a "standard " . But have a look at your everyday tech. Standards are not easy. There are still WiFi routers/repeaters that cannot talk to each other nicely, just to give an example.
Usually in life critical systems you don't have interoperability issues because there is no interoperability. Huge fail-safe systems from a single vendor.