ique

That’s actually pretty cheap, especially if it delivers on the promises. I spent about $6k on my current setup.

There are essentially no applications that require email. We should just stop doing email verification altogether. If you need to have a separate communication channel with your user just establish that separately after signup.

TCP/IP doesn’t care about your privacy.

I think a large part of the problem is that so much software (like Office) is turning into a service when it doesn’t need to be.

Then we're all doomed. Regulation has proven they have neither the interest nor capability to do anything about it, GDPR being the perfect example which have achieved nothing more than make Web2 more annoying to use.

If the answer to killing the ad funding business model was individuals pay directly it’s going to face a steep uphill

Indeed, we tried that and it failed, so we need something else.

Blockchain will probably fail because the narrative has been taken over by greed and NFTs.

But Web3 will fail because the tech world seemingly (as evidenced by the comments here) have no interest in solving the problems of Web2, rampant privacy violations, predatory business models and advertising. The answer to all these problems by HN is ”no one cares about privacy so it’s not worth solving”.

Good luck! I hope you succeed, it’s certainly a goal worth pursuing!

Data will never be stored on blockchains, its not what they’re for. It’s amusing that you’re so vehemently against something you know nothing about.

Monopolies like Google and Facebook exist because of advertising. Remove advertising and they don't exist.

The fact that they're processing a lot of data is in large part because they need to for advertising.

Still, your understanding of blockchain tech is misleading here. Ethereum is public key registry at best and is not and should not be used to store or process data.

In a blockchain world you can still have service providers, but the user is the one with the power, not the service provider. Users are free to switch service providers as they see fit because their identity and data isn't tied to a single company.

If it has dependency on capital investment, it's not blockchain tech. Like almost by definition. Unless you adopt a super dumb idea of "blockchain = linked list". If you're talking about more than the data structure then what you're saying makes no sense.

You are using a very different meaning of centralisation and decentralisation than blockchain people do.

That's neither here nor there though.

The way you kill Facebook, Google and any Web2 company is to kill their business model. These are all 100% ad-funded businesses. Kill the advertising funded internet and these monopolies categorically die with it.

The only _attempt_ I've ever seen at addressing the issue that all the major websites are ad-funded has been within the blockchain space. Show me any other realistic alternative to ad-funding and I will happily adopt it.

What makes a problem worth solving exactly?

How many SaaS businesses do we need? How many todo apps do we need? How many game engines do we need?

Most people don't care about X, so clearly anyone trying to build a product to address X is just a scam.

The idea that blockchain tech is somehow invented out of nothing and then we search for a problem to match couldn't be further from the truth. Talk to anyone who works in the industry and they're trying to solve a problem.

I used to work in blockchain tech and the main problem I was focused on was "How do we prevent internet monopolies like Facebook and Google?".

If you don't see those monopolies as a problem, then you're disagreeing with the problem space, that doesn't make it "trying to find a problem".

The parts of it being uploaded to iCloud, not the whole thing, yes?

If you leave your phone on default settings, that’s all of them. In fact you need to turn off a lot of things. Turn off backups, Photo Stream, Files, Mail Drop, album sharing (make sure you don’t accept any invites to shared albums or you will get flagged) and I’m sure there are more iCloud integrations I’m not aware of.

It’s actually quite hard to not use iCloud, by design.

Apple has caved to china many many times, a quick googling of it will give you a list.

The difference between the "old" content scanning and the new is indeed that they are now willing to "use" the results of that. Facial recognition was client-side only (or so they said), the results of which never left your phone.

Now they're doing content scanning and sending it to themselves as well as others.

In parallel Apple is starting up a growing advertising business, hiring aggressively and expecting that to be a big part of their future revenue. If they're now "allowed" (by its users) to do content scanning _and_ sharing the results, why wouldn't they use those results for themselves to target you with ads?

To all the people suggesting ad blockers, read the post and look at the image. There is no adblocker in the world that would block this. It’s a suggested video, a feature built specifically by youtube to push ”premium” content. The full page ad is also a new type of thing for youtube to market its own events.

Clearly youtube doesn’t see this as ads (though it is) and no adblocker would see them as ads either.

Trusting facebook as the central clearing house for all of our personal data doesn’t seem to have worked out very well.

Why did they stop working?

I’ve been using Matrix with Riot, now Element, for 5 years and it’s only ever gotten worse. You really shouldn’t expect to see improvements.

They sold 10%, so they expect to be in for a few more rounds. Pump and dumpers rarely just aim for one single big cycle, you go in waves for max profit.

Just another reason to have content-adressable storage everywhere, then at least if it changed you’ll know it changed, and if you can’t get the original content anymore then the change is probably malicious.

So basically they re-invented light clients and checkpointing?

Hahaha really HN? As a Swede this is so ridiculous, I don't think the author has any idea what they're talking about and have done no fact-checking at all. They even contradict themselves.

drop in homicides has been, however, far smaller in Sweden than in neighboring countries

So there's been a drop in homicides

Shootings in the country have become so common

But shootings have _become_ so common? So they're just missing more or what?

What a ridiculous article, I guess HN is the new Fox news.

This is just a trusted RPC connection right? You're not embedding any sort of light (or otherwise) client? Are you running the nodes on the backend, as opposed to outsourcing to someone like infura? What are you running if so (geth, parity, something else) and how (single node or multiple nodes load-balanced)? Curious to hear the setup.

What you're saying is just "trusting any system is insane", which sure, it might be (depending on the criticalness of said system).

But that's not very insightful or informative, how does that drive any sort of decision-making or improvement process?

Do you have any suggestion on how to improve the correctness of systems that work better than formal verification?

Roughly 1 per month

So you're saying it's perfectly feasible to become an expert C++ programmer over a weekend, but it's completely impossible to learn Haskell?

Its interesting to see a lot of alternative implementations of credstash pop up, there was one written in Haskell recently called "credentials". https://github.com/brendanhay/credentials

You are right, editing my comment.