informal007

This help me understand meaning of Pi as open source ai coding agent

Tried today, I like the record track feature

I had my first hiking in a route without network connection one month ago, that was the first time I used the GPS without network by Organic Maps even I knew I could do it in the past. It showed me the possibility that some feature work well without network. It's a really good experience.

I wrote below comment when I read 20% of this article, like a person shooting everything down. But the more I read, the more I enjoy.

Thanks for pointing out that inherent physiological flaw in humans, it's hard to realize that, this is very meaningful.

""" > None of these people are wrong or stupid. And none of them have added any value. Different opinions and more experience on current topic bring some value. """

Really surprised for the frequent innovation of Anthropic

Maybe most of users of anthropic are individual developers over employee in tech company.

I'm really happy that they choose telegram and discord.

This reminds me the invitation rules like lobste.rs, but it's not the ideal option

You use the same name with a research writing tool from OpenAI

https://openai.com/prism

Apple is a closed ecosystem, multiple users feature is a opposite of that.

For example, it's hard to manage app store purchased Apps if it's easy to switch users in iPad. It's hard to manage iCloud sync when switching, it's also related with privacy.

Is there a place to show what users use OpenClaw in life or work?

I’ve tried OpenClaw two weeks but don’t know what it can do for me.

I let it to finish some project for me, but the most hard work for project is validating the results over giving instructions

I believe that employees in Anthropocs use CC to develop CC now.

AI really give much user ability to develop a completed product, but the quality is decreasing. Professional developers will be in demand when the products/features become popular.

First batch of users of new products need to take more responsibility to test the product like a rats in lab

The market is huge enough to including all kinds of consumers

Another reason that push to kill subscription is that many users just want software that actually works forever—no subscriptions, no ads. That’s why so many of us prefer one-time purchases. I’m definitely in that camp. I stick to local-first apps because I know they won't get worse over time.

I agree that software without a service model faces a tough market. Sometimes, users just want software that works indefinitely on their phones without subscriptions or ads. That’s why many people are big fans of one-time purchase apps. I’m one of them; I prefer local apps because I know the software won't deteriorate over time.

I think it depends on what percentage of apps need a website. Most users use apps on their devices, for me, I don't want to open another website when I need an App if it's avoidable.

https://blog.bensontech.dev/

https://www.bensontech.dev/

Smart idea! Thanks for sharing.

If we move the detection and modification process from paste to copy operation, that will reduce in-use latency

I don't think model code is a big deal compared to the idea. If public can recognize the value of idea 11 months ago, they could implement the code quickly because there are so much smart engineers in AI field.

Cannot image how often this will happen after we are buried under fake contents from AI.

This is the fast way they can try, but it shouldn't be the most trustworthy way and shouldn't be in report.

Maybe they want to catch up the steps of Antigravity.

Running code is absolutely going to happen for coding assistant.

Does I expose my latitude and longitude after visiting a url?

it will be more excited if i can use this feature in application with GUI, it’s now convenient to check the result after edit the PDF, i need to transfer between CLI and PDF reader

Speaking of filtering trustworthy URLs, Google is the best option to do that because he has more historical data in search business.

Hope google can do something for preventing prompt injection for AI community.

It seem that Google doesn't prepare well to release Gemini 3 but leak many contents, include the model card early today and gemini 3 on aistudio.google.com

bad customer service comes from low priority. I think anthropic prioritize new growth point over small number of customer’s feedback, that’s why they publish new product, features so frequently, there are so much possible potential opportunities for them to focus

Database might be the future, but viable solution on excel are evidence to prove that it works

agree with you, but it cannot be stopped. development of technology always makes wealth distribution more centralized

this will push the development of open source models.

people think of privacy at first regards of data, local deployment of open source models are the first choice for them

you might trust when the precision is extremely high and others agree with that.

high precision is possible because they can realize that by multiple cross validations