HN user

iiv

329 karma
Posts6
Comments68
View on HN

The content is an overt attempt to convince you to start a blog.

That's a bit of a useless comment, isn't it?

Emoji Kitchen 4 years ago

The resulting "dish" is a png that you can open in a new tab, or just download straight away.

0.999...= 1 6 years ago

0, if we're talking natural numbers or integers. There isn't one if we're talking real numbers. Simple proof:

Assume x is the largest number smaller than 1.

(x + 1)/2 is a number larger than x but smaller than 1. Our assumption that x is the largest number smaller than 1 must be wrong. QED.

Interesting. I found one problem, though. (Or is it a feature?)

All examples I listened to of "coup de grâce" pronounced it /ku də ɡrɑː/, while the "correct" way (if there is such a thing)is /ku də ɡrɑs/.

This kind of thing must come up in more examples. I'm not usually on the prescriptive side of things, but I think it's important to know the "right" way to do things, at least when you're learning a language. On the other hand, hypercorrection will probably never disappear, so why not embrace it?

You didn't answer the question: what is so horrible about trying to help oneself by tempering one's emotions and seeking happiness within?

I guess "just Google for Mu" won't work any more

Has it so far? Did you say "Mu"? In that case people could have googled for all kinds of things: Mew or moo or me or something else. And even if they knew how it is spelled the first results would have been the greek letter mu, the zen mu, or the football team Manchester United. In Sweden a lot of the results were about a children's tv-programme, Mamma Mu.

Your editor is not on the first, second or third page of Google, I didn't look any further, because who does?

It's probably good for you that you realised saying "just Google for Mu" won't work "anymore".