HN user
Thanks. I missed that one. Not much cost info there but, I like the sound of:
"In computers, a Sandia Cooler would mean that we could finally cross the 4GHz/150W TDP thermal wall — or build computers that are thinner and quieter."
per SUBdomain. So just use:
example.com
1.example.com
2.example.com
...
They didn't used the word 'model' but said, for example, in final paragraph:
“His code was clean, well-written, and submitted in a timely fashion,” ... “Quarter after quarter, his performance review noted him as the best developer in the building.”
Even before this suspension there was recent evidence that in non-advertorials The Atlantic was willing to call out Scientology. Googling "scientology site:theatlantic.com" yields, for example:
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/01/a-wonder... (dated Jan 14, 2013. Weirdly uncritical, simple praise for a book on Scientology)
July 2012 The Atlantic: "Psychiatry vs. Scientology":
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/07/scientolog...
Maybe it is. But this closed system crap is one of the things I hate about LinkedIn. When I visit the link you offered I am greeted with:
"You and this LinkedIn user don’t know anyone in common. You can only view the profiles of users within your network. However, as you add connections, you may discover people you know in common."
Want to take a screen shot of what you were able to share?
I'm not sure that a fair characterization of her motive, not at least as she tweeted her apology:
"@randizuckerberg I'm just your subscriber and this was top of my newsfeed. Genuinely sorry but it came up in my feed and seemed public."
Screenshot source: http://www.buzzfeed.com/jpmoore/mark-zuckerbergs-sister-comp...
In what browser. There's scroll bar in Safari 6/Mac. And Safari’s "Reader" feature also seems to scroll it properly.
Can't speak from inside knowledge, but it has been observed when this was asked in past that during slow period (middle of night, U.S. time; Sunday mornings) it takes surprisingly little activity to rise quickly to top (if only briefly).
You’re making me homesick.
How many ISPs can (or would) post a news item on their home page re: EFF...
“Sonic.net privacy policies recognized by the EFF The Electronic Frontier Foundation assessed the policies of 18 leading Internet companies, and Sonic.net has come out with top marks. The EFF wrote in their report that...”
FWIW: No ties to sonic.net
At least he's tweeted (few hours ago) that his "AJAX fumble" is "being corrected": https://twitter.com/Chris_Gaun
It seems to me, bearing in mind my numerous career changes, that honest self-assessment is in order so that you can identify: 1) other (complementary or divergent) strengths you have and 2) what intrinsic drives of yours could be harnessed in a next career.
At times (for me) it has even been helpful to get professional career-counseling to discover careers (or even avocations) whose shape and impact have changed in preceding decade since I last looked at it. There are useful psychological batteries for assessing the fit between fit/vocation that take such assessment far beyond navel-gazing/tea-leaf-reading.
Another approach would be to involve yourself with an organization (vocation or volunteer) with a project that appeals to your vision for a better world - and discover what roles beyond traditional mathematician you find you can make a contribution to. Hope that's some help.
> But companies aren't afraid to cheap out on programmers. If a project fails or is late, there is a perception that that's just how software goes, no decision they could have made could have changed the outcome.
I'm in no position to judge this, but I wonder: With increasing visibility for the cost of digital security/privacy to a corporation, isn't there hope for better valuation of programming by the "C-suite execs"?
I take Pearson's subtext to be: The eTextbook, eLearning field craves to be disrupted.
If you were providing services to AWS - that would "be doing business in US". I don't see how renting a service (AWS) from Amazon is "doing business in US" any more than would be buying a book from Amazon.com N'est-ce pas?
> we've heard...
But did you hear it from a tax attorney / certified accountant?
That being said (and: I've no experience in Sweden, and I'm neither atty nor acct) the idea that a US tax liability could be incurred by an international corp/business purchasing a service (e.g., AWS) from company in U.S. ...seems pretty outrageous.
> doesn't feel like something anybody wants to be chasing any more
A reasonable speculation. Of course the best data will take a while to become available.
The one data point (showing in headlines this morning) is that, judging that it took only 1 hour for iP5 shipping time to move back from 1 week to 2 weeks, this phone is selling several times as fast as any iPhone predecessor.
Apparently some body is "chasing it."
> Due to rule xyz, we would technically have to freeze...
This leaves me wondering, how clearly are PayPal's rules spelled out (I've just avoided PP like the plague, since I can) to help merchants avoid gotchas? Are freeze-worthy violations presented boldly ...or only buried in tiny TOS-like legal documents?
Actually, in the details of the story you find that you can "enjoy" the infection elsewhere...
"Only five states — New York, California, Texas, Oregon and Illinois — report the disease, and the data is inconsistent. Oftentimes, departments rely on each other to deal with paperwork, and the numbers are never recorded, Smith says. As a result, not much is known about tapeworm outbreaks in the U.S. — or the parasites themselves."
It also sounds as though the long dormancy of the symptoms make it extremely difficult to determine where it was contracted.
>the OP may have triggered the freeze by clearing the account of nearly all funds a couple of days after the phone interview.
It would be very helpful for someone to post (from experience and/or inside knowledge) a "How work with PayPal and avoid problems" FAQ
I'd love to see it... for what it might guide to do on services other than S3
Let's hope that the revelations around these abuses can motivate the higher corporate structure. It seemed to light a fire under Apple when the FoxConn, etc. labor practice were revealed. If noisy enough, bad PR can motivate change.
In contrast to the OP's example, Activity Monitor shows my MBP (Mountain Lion) has only 53MB used by Dock. And that's with about 60 items in my dock (though only about 12 apps open right now).
Wonder if his GB of Dock memory gets reduced after a simple killall Dock
Sorry. How annoying. I apparently came to the article from some blog. What will make the article appear in its entirety is to get there from a Google search. It's top result when Googling for:
yahoo makeover site:wsj.com
(The couple of 19-year-olds) told him “I honestly didn’t have any heat towards you before this. i just liked your username like I said before.”
"No heat towards you" -> But I will wipe your laptop. :/
FWIW: My family's last 7 Macs have all been refurbs. The $ saved go to purchase additional (non-apple) RAM.
The last Mac I had that developed hardware problem (out-of-warranty) was not one of those refurbs.
Strange. Goes to article when I click on it.
Yes: months old. Upon discovering it, I was surprised no one else had linked to it back when the book was being debated.
Definitely worth forwarding to your representatives - or anyone else concerned about public policy regarding patents.
Jugaad: A New Growth Formula for Corporate America
by Navi Radjou, Jaideep Prabhu, and Simone Ahuja | 2010
http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2010/01/jugaad_a_new_growth_formula_...
>> evil "collectivists" ... are saying that "what is considered to be in the public domain should be greatly expanded."
It is "collectivist" to release software (etc.) in public domain???
Something done only by collectivists? So that if I contribute to FOSS I must be labeled a collectivist?
Maybe the Paul's better offer further explanations.
[edited for clarity]