HN user

hoophoop

94 karma
Posts1
Comments38
View on HN

there is nothing wrong with advertising per se, it's a natural part of a free market economy.

There is plenty wrong. Even Adam Smith's purely theoretical concept of "free market" requires buyers and sellers to be purely rational actors and be fully and correctly informed.

Advertising has one goal: making customers less rational and more biased towards a given product.

[dead] 5 years ago

when does it make sense to track anything against trader bonuses

It's another a measure of the ever increasing inequality in some countries.

Such topic that certainly impacts the life of people commenting on HN.

When did tombert assume that poor = "crazy" = criminal?

It's implied here:

"I think being really broke greatly hinders your ability to think rationally."

...by putting that sentence out alone without clarifying the context.

psychological pathways

unfairly reify

Are you feeling ok?

I think being really broke greatly hinders your ability to think rationally.

No: being really broke can cause a lot of anxiety that can lead to irrational behavior.

But often a person has to choose between homelessness and crime and picks the latter as a rational choice, given the alternative.

So please don't assume poor = "crazy" = criminal, it's a bit unkind.

As a non-native speaker I might make other grammatical errors but not the ones related to phonetics.

Often I found more difficult to understand English written by native speakers than by others because of that.

#ffffff is the color of looking directly into the sun and absolutely painful bright, #000000 is the color of the deepest, starless night

No. There's no definition of what they map to.

That's why we need USERS to be able to scale the ranges of brightness and contrast.

My environment changes during the day. I want to be the one in control of my screen, not some random website.

...the simple fact that there's no guarantee that either the server or the client would receive updates.

That means hard-forking the old server and client and maintain them as an independent project forever.

That's what's stopping me and many other people from creating a community and federated version.

So the client is open source and guarantees end-to-end encryption regardless of what the server does. Ok, then I honestly don't care. Why should I?

You should because any successful centralized messenger is one update away from becoming entirely closed source.

If Signal will reach say a billion users it will be able to do that without significant userbase loss, due to network effect.

safety characteristics, which as stated are apparently ensured by the client regardless of what the server does

In reality, the contact social graph and the frequency and pattern of messages between users is leaked.

Any global observer can do a correlation attack thanks to the centralized servers (and absence of onion routing).

Hollywood is based on their ability to create films that cut across all the cultures

Hollywood is widely caricatured outside of the US for its disconnect from reality. Flat characters, childish good VS baddies dichotomies, bombastic action movies...

Let's stop with the performative cynicism on HN.

There is overwhelming scientific evidence that (mentally healthy) humans are pretty capable of empathy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathy

They motivate their selfish actions, to others but also to themselves (Motivated Reasoning) with noble sounding arguments

You are claiming that selfishness is the only driver but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivated_reasoning goes both ways.

Besides, why do you refer to people as "they"? Are you a bot?