hndamien

We would all benefit from progress if only they would stop printing money.

It would just mean your total fixed subscription cost is apportioned across all of the artists you play in the month in proportion. It’s not an extremely difficult calculation.

The record company representing that one artist also does not get $7 of the $10.

Tax them again!

The problem with aspartame is your gut microbiome, not cancer. Sugar is probably better for you, but keep it to small amounts.

I see no watermelon.

Well, that’s about as low effort as Suno gets, so I’m not sure you should expect to like it more than a laugh. But when you put effort into the songwriting and shaping you can produce legitimately good music. This is my third highest ranking streaming song and it actually got some airplay on US radio stations - https://music.apple.com/au/album/too-much-winning/1788045206...

This song was produced a long time ago from a verbatim hacker news comment, and got released on Spotify and Apple and became a favorite at home.

Your comment inspired me to upgrade it to 4.5 because it did have that AI tinny quality. https://suno.com/s/tbZlkBL7XeLVuuN0

It sounds better but has lost some magic.

Here is the original comment - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39997706

In that spirit, from the same “artist” here is your comment - https://suno.com/s/AumsIqrIovVhT0c9

And

https://suno.com/s/YGlpHptX6yXJVpHq

Not sure which I like more.

Your real poetry on the other hand, pretty good!

This is a Suno generated Alan Watts inspired meditation. Absolutely agree!

https://music.apple.com/au/album/breath-of-the-cosmos/175227...

https://open.spotify.com/track/0mJoJ0XiQZ8HglUdhWhg2F?si=tID...

https://suno.com/s/LHRmE867FslALzz6

Have you tried Rowy.io?

https://vote.gameon.futbol/

I built a player’s player voting tool. If you play sports, enjoy!

I built a minimalist player’s player voting tool. If you play sports, Enjoy!

https://vote.gameon.futbol/

Is science supposed to use the scientific method to investigate anything? No sacred cows?

They don’t mean “Democracy” when they say “Democracy”.

It is a reference to specific testing of general models. Specific models can probably do this pretty easily, but genearl vision models acting on video still struggle. Not sure why this is controversial or down voted. Go and test it for yourself.

Not generative AI, General AI.

Current general AI models cannot tell accurately if a soccer ball went in a goal or missed. Still a way to go for accurate police reports.

G'day mate - Australian here too, but I have to strongly disagree with equating social media age verification to buying alcohol or tobacco.

There's a fundamental difference between regulated privileges that can physically harm/kill people (drinking, smoking, driving) and basic rights of communication and information access that democracies depend on.

Your government ID verification example actually highlights the key problem - whether it's platforms or government holding the data, you're creating a permanent link between real identity and every comment, like, share and interaction. That's not at all like showing ID at a bottle shop - it's more like having to show ID before every conversation you have at the pub, with someone keeping a permanent record. This verification applies to everyone, not just kids. In any case, they should not have their access to information restricted. Currently, X is the most legitimate source of real news with Community notes, where legacy media has completed failed - WMD, Lab Leak, etc. Etc.

Think about what that means for: - Whistleblowers exposing corruption - People discussing sensitive health issues - Anyone criticizing powerful institutions - Workers organizing or discussing workplace issues - People exploring political views different from their family/employer - Activists trying to create positive change

The "conflict of interest" argument cuts both ways - governments have a clear interest in expanding surveillance capabilities. Many of us opposing this genuinely care about preserving democratic freedoms, not corporate profits.

I get the desire to protect kids (I'm a parent too), but this is like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. We can push for better parental controls, algorithmic transparency, and targeting of specific harmful behaviors without compromising the anonymous speech that democracies need to function.

Surveillance creep has real effects on public discourse, and this is classic authoritarianism wrapped in “think of the children”.

The fact that an overwhelming amount of the 15,000 responses in 24hr oppose this makes your humble opinion that you want it in a tiny minority.

Words have meanings, if we don’t use them and have a shared understanding of them, dialogue becomes exceptionally difficult.

Nobody in Australia wants this Orwellian surveillance legislation. 15,000 comments, overwhelmingly negative 95%+, in the sneaky 24hr window they allowed for comment at all.

X.com

My goal is to see if I can get my kids all the way through highschool with just an Apple smart watch and an iPad for home and school stuff where it is required. It seems completely doable.

X is answering this but having you pay for the service as a primary revenue model.

Exactly, it is a central bank.

This seems like a very annoying way to consume information. Perhaps I’m old.

Design for mobile and this is less of a problem. Toasts are right there!

Even if it was specifically targeted it could still be pro-gay and anti-trans. So they are drawing a long bow to say it is homophobia.

I’d let junior developers work from my home if they really wanted to hang out.

There are sleek units that don't have the external part for apartments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9J-YyrU_D_I Cheaper too I think.