HN user

hjanssen

361 karma
Posts0
Comments71
View on HN
No posts found.
eu/acc 2 years ago

This paints a picture of the future that imo is kind of fatalistic and dystopian. I personally refuse to accept that this is the inevitable end state of our society and markets.

eu/acc 2 years ago

German here.

If the way you are building a product requires you to risk the well being of your employees, which these laws are designed to protect, you and your product are not welcome here.

Please build it somewhere else.

eu/acc 2 years ago

This reads like its a group advocating for exactly the wrong kind of deregulation that turns markets into basically unbreakable monopolys.

The EU directly opposes the growth model of the new-era tech startups (ruthless growth financed by investor money, take over competitors, market monopoly) and the regulations aim to keep markets at least a little bit competitive.

We (the EU) do not need or want this kind of deregulation.

So what is your proposed solution? I'd rather have a sociopath that is upfront about being one to me than figuring that fact out by myself.

Shunning those people from society seems like not an option to me, they are people after all.

I think normalizing sociopathic behaviour is something to be worried about, but I personally don't see that happening anywhere so I am unsure what your point is.

This does ignore the damage done to the free market though. Every job that a prison inmate takes up, is a job that could be taken by a non-criminal and which would pay for at least federal minimum wage.

I'd call the difference of prison wage and the minimum wage lost money.

I actually like self-checkouts very much and use them every time they are available. The reason is very simple: They typically do not require any social interaction. I like to shop with music on my ears and generally am pretty deep inside my head when I shop, because I like to plan my shopping list and would like to do that in peace. I hate the superficial social interactions at the register like saying hello and wishing a nice day (which is common and expected here in Germany, where I live).

Now don't get me wrong, I'm pretty social inside my own circle or when I go out for a drink for example (although I am Gen Z, so there's that), but I really do not like these interactions when they are forced and imposed upon me while doing mundane tasks like grocery shopping.

I was pretty surprised when the article claimed customers do not like them because that is the reception I've also gathered from friends.

It says in the article that the faces are swapped with those of actors. Are those something like film actors? Because that would actually be amazing, completely dodging the drawback several commenters here have mentioned that faces of innocent people could be used.

Actors faces are already public. Then again,I would probably be pissed when my face would be used as a mask to say something I might not agree with. Interesting question if that is ethical or not.

Emphasis on

if left unchecked

This obviously represents an error on how abuse is handled in these power structures.

What baffles me the most, is that this list in particular is not only shared between staff or subordinates, but concerns colleagues. It seems that women feel that they cannot speak out against such forms of potential abuse because they fear they will get themself axed, even if the alleged abuser is power-wise on the same level.

This is very concerning to hear, but frankly not surprising if you speak with any woman that operates in any kind of hierarchy, be it corporate or otherwise.

This is why the concept of "granular permissions" is so important on modern pcs, and I personally think linux is severely lacking in this regard.

Flatpack et al. have improved this situation somewhat, but come with their own drawbacks. Linux needs a central application-level permission system like Android, where I can grant/revoke e.g. internet access to applications. Frankly, I should never have to use sudo to install anything in my daily life, that is unfortunately not the case with the common ubuntu install, and will probably stay this way for a long time.

It seems to me that enabling string replacement with all lookups enabled by default would be a dangerous idea to begin with. Why would it be implemented that way?

Having a replacement that is based on arbitrary scripts (!) seems especially questionable to me, in my brain that is a niche use case and should be turned off by default.

Maybe we have to sharpen the awareness of the common developer to these kind of dangerous practices, like we did with SQL injection attacks where string concatenation to create your queries is generally frowned upon and is regarded as a bad practice industry-wide.

This is such an overly negative reaction it is frankly mind boggling.

The UI is optional. It is literally an extension you can install separately. Nobody is taking anything from you.

There is a place to criticise bloated and Ad-ridden web pages. This extension is not it.

Not sure if Bun has had an influence on this, these features must have been in development for a long time, but the timing surely is impeccable.

npm compatibility is huge for Deno. It is basically the one major drawback to Deno, which gets hopefully fixed with this feature. It also looks like this compatibility layer is implemented transparently in the existing module management, which is a big bonus. Nobody wants to deal with node_modules anymore when working with Deno for an extended period, just love to see this.

free transit mostly serves to divert people from walking and cycling, not cars and planes

Source for this claim? I would be surprised if it holds true.

Most rail transportation could not handle the crush of additional riders from free rides

This is a problem with the infrastructure, not free rides. Of course capacity planning has to be adapted to keep up with increased usage, but thats literally what we want. We want more people to use public transportation, limiting or capping usage is the wrong approach IMHO.

The idea that really any state on this planet would recognize such a "state" as independent and would not treat it as a terrorist/criminal organisation is laughable and reeks of the typical tech-bro mindset that I have come to expect of any individual who willingly associates themselves with the crypto-bubble.

Companys have shown time and time again that they are not to be trusted. Especially Amazon has not been in the news so much because the working conditions are so good, remind you.

It is in my opinion totally a legit view to first believe the workers. History has shown that corruption and lawbreaking are many magnitudes more prevalent in corporations than unions.

Currently using pipewire on Ubuntu 21.10 via the ppa (which is linked in another comment here).

Experience has been flawless until now. Its truly an outstanding piece of software that "just works" and gets out of your way. I am really, really happy to use it, it has simplified so many things in my day to day life.

Before, using pulseaudio, connecting my bluetooth headset and getting any application to work with it was a serious pain, now it is a matter of turning the headset on and boom, connected, all audio switches automagically over to the headset.

Im not sure that the apolitical stance many people believe to hold is such an apolitical stance. In fact, living in any state and taking part in any kind of society is political in and of itself.

You do not get to take part in any community without having a political stance - being part of a community is communicating that you agree with the morals and values of the community and wilfully accept them - thats the basis and general agreement of a community, it's what differentiates a group of people from a community.

Now, Im not sure that turning a blind eye to the consequences that this has is inherently wrong, that surely depends on what impact the concrete political/moral/ethical stance has, but I disagree with the notion that, really, anything is apolitical. In context, everything is political, and we have to live with the notion that anything we do has impact on other people, as long as the consequences of the the thing we are doing is visible to other people.

At work, we use MinIO as a replacement of the S3 Api on our CI servers since we dont want to call production APIs for integration testing.

One of the challenges we had was "pre-filling" the MinIO server with testdata. Some tests require reading a testfile from our mocked S3 API. We wanted to have those testfiles instantly available at MinIO startup, but couldn not get that to work with docker volume mounts, MinIO simply would not recognize the files and serve a 404.

Has anyone got that working or a proposal for an alternative solution? We resorted to uploading the files via the application on startup (if it is in "testing mode"), but that does feel like a dirty hack.

There are several countries with strong unions and a tradition of unions taking part in company matters, a good example would be my place, Germany. I have never seen a union "screwing over" a company, but many times have I seen complains that the unions screwed the company over from people that directly or indirectly profit from weak or no unions.

I have never said that the person should not exist. Please refrain from interpreting my comment in bad faith.

I am just sad that these opinions still exist. And I am more saddened that people think it is helpful or furthers the discussion to post these opinions. Suicide rates among trans people are definitly a topic to be discussed, but seeing the rest of the comment, I just cant shake the feeling that it was twisted in a way to support a talking point that was just _mean_ and ill-intentioned.

He alludes to the fact that the text you wrote as a comment is transmitted as "information" in the form of bytes.

But to formulate a counterpoint to this argument and support your original comment: The bytes we send via cables to transmit text are at a basic level just that: bytes. Ones and zeros. What makes these bytes understandable information is the fact that we have all agreed that a certain sequence of bits is assigned to a certain picture: A text symbol. This agreement has been a major source of pains and problems throughout the history of computing, think all these different text encodings and the problems that arise when you try to open a file with a different encoding than the one which it was saved with: You see a gibberish of symbols that do not make sense.

Which is why you have a point here: The pc does not care what information it transmits, it is only text because we have "taught" the pc to display a specific symbol (picture) when a certain sequence of bits is encountered.