hidelooktropic

I like the idea but it takes a lot of thinking power that I have to come up with actual words that long each time.

They are just making the point that it makes sense that subagents would use more tokens because they have none of the parent's context.

I can talk faster than I can type.

Here is the music from the video: https://music.apple.com/us/album/on-an-evening-at-the-lake-f...

Wow. That's fascinating. Thanks for that explanation. So these images come to be consequentially from initial state and weights...

Especially for fable, that's not a fair comparison.

For the unfamiliar, could someone explain what I'm looking at? The abstract was a little too concrete (heh) for me to follow.

It's just Facebook.

You make a good point that not having it is easy to spot. But what precisely would flip the switch?

Seducing someone for example, how often would that have to work? On all people? Maybe that was just thrown out as an example but it points to how subjective these goal posts are.

The overlapping AGI definition I use here is "Most purely cognitive labor is automatable at better quality, speed, and cost than humans". For some of these researchers, saying they use this definitions is a bit of a stretch, but I included everyone who I judged as close enough to be informative.

Seems "AGI" is on the same level as "art" or "love" in that everyone knows what we're talking about but no one can nail down unanimously what it is.

I guarantee you no one is working on this.

I don't know what you're talking about. I always reserve right up to the knife's edge of what I actually use.

Oh relax. Let people make things. It's okay to have more than one take on an idea.

I understand the article is actually not about support chatbots specifically but seeing the conversation here talked about that it's not out of place to join in that discussion. Attempting to shame people by accusing them of not reading is hardly constructive. This isn't Reddit.

I agree that's why I would prefer to have AI if it does the job better and if it can be further trained to understand when to escalate in the case of a more technical user which I have found humans rarely do.

It matters less to me that the helper is an AI/human than the kind of help I'm getting.

The bigger problem to me is "help" is always framed as my needing to be educated, not a problem with the service. This is especially prevalent for technical customers who are legitimately trying to draw attention to a bug in the platform only to get how-to help articles pasted back to them.

There are many concerns and areas for improvement with open claw and other similar projects (continuous loop script with broad OS access that manages your agents and interfaces with a standard messaging app)

However, file size I have never seen on that list. I would rather offer for something that is even bigger in file size so it afford certain functionality like better security tighter permissions however it would do that.

The whole point is to measure your hardware capability. How would you do that as a website?

So you do things one step at a time and timebox as you go? This method probably doesn't need its own name. In fact I think that's just what timeboxing is.

Not sure what you have against it. Works great for me. No subscription required. And if I do want to pay for ad free shows and support creators it's easy to do so.

Use whatever you like but I don't think Podcast app users are rare by any stretch of the imagination.

Yes. I want AI in some things (some)

You might want to review the influence of William the conqueror on the English language.

How can I get early access to this "Human" model on the benchmarks? /s

13/s is not slow. Q4 is not bad. The models that run on phones are never 30B or anywhere close to that.

Do those of us not cool enough to know already get to find out what 996 means?

She was long forgotten. Her notoriety is actually a recent phenomenon.

Reminds me of the incorrect "A whole nother"

Unfortunately the GPL license makes it dead in the water for using something like this at work

:(

Notes is a writing tool that approachable and easy to use. It also works across the ecosystem on a syncing platform I already pay for and whose privacy I am comfortable with. I like the idea of setting up a simple text based website without needing to adopt a new editor. That's plenty value prop to me.

Correct, the examples here are not real. They are examples.