heywintermute

The circular financing of AI spend isn't exactly a new story. Pretty sure even Altman has publicly said it's bubble

roughly 10% of their corporate workforce wow

Mods have a way of boosting posts to refresh them back into the algorithm hence why you see some posts weeks ago showing back up

Repo has be archived - "NOTE: This proposal is no longer pursued."

https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity

Apparently this[0] is a possible way of opting out by phone but can't speak to it personally as I haven't tried it

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27703091#27705428

A candidate who was caught lip syncing to someone talking in the room behind them

For those who haven't seen this before: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47mfohGyeBg

As long as California does, and most other places allow them, we're going to continue to see surprisingly high levels of startup formation and company success in California, despite all the bad things being true.

If that were truly the case wouldn't a number of other states also be banning non-completes in hopes of attracting businesses? Some quick googling shows only the District of Columbia, North Dakota, and Oklahoma have similar bans on non-competes as California.

"And yet, most young men in the country argue that it is men, not women, in South Korea who feel threatened and marginalized. Among South Korean men in their 20s, nearly 79 percent said they were victims of serious gender discrimination, according to a poll in May."

Not really an excuse but it's worth pointing out that South Korea has conscription which women are exempt from

If you've seen the question/answer before just say so!

In reality no one will do this though. There is way to much of an incentive on the candidate side to lie and work through as if they haven't seen it before.

It seems like the model is to have a slick UI and hire contractors from India with second rate English skills handle the grunt work

Seems more and more common unfortunately

YT link doesn't work

every third article on HN was about yet another JavaScript framework.

Felt like that with articles about Rust as well

It's even more frustrating when it some programming related blog and you can't copy and paste the code snippet

It's a free game that heavily revolves around buying lootboxes to unlock characters/items and is known as a gacha game[0] They are often intentionally designed to make it really difficult to experience the full game without being forced to spend real money on lootboxes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gacha_game

Or is there something intrinsic to Reddit traffic that makes it difficult to monetize?

Reddit is also home to an enormous amount of porn and nsfw content in general which probably hurts this. They only just started preventing sexually explicit subreddits/content from appearing on r/all six months ago[0]

https://www.reddit.com/r/changelog/comments/lhnvok/removing_...

Except it literally does?

Cornett, off work for a few weeks, realized he received enough money through unemployment benefits to start saving — for the first time. He wondered if the work he loves would ever entail a job that came with health insurance or paid leave. "I was working what I decided was going to be my last kitchen job," Cornett said.

5k sounds like an incredibly small amount of money. The equivalent of a week's salary in the US.

It's almost comedic how out of touch this comment is. Reminds me of this[0]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nl_Qyk9DSUw

Was gonna say I feel like I've seen this posted on HN a few times now

It's easy to steal.

It only takes one 0-day wipe you out, irreversibly, and completely. My bank could get hacked, but we, as a society, can just decide that I still have the assets I had before, the paper stocks and coupons are in a drawer somewhere. The loan contracts are in a filing cabinet (or they should be). I get my bank statements every month. There's some cash and some gold in a vault. A breach is, at least theoretically, reversible. That's not true with bitcoin.

Isn't this more just an argument that cryptocurrency's are just riskier because unlike tradition financial institutions/investments they are unregulated and lack protections such as insurance etc. Maybe I am just getting caught up in semantics but a 0-day wiping out the value of Bitcoin/Crypto with no vehicle in place to restore that value to its owners if something were to happen just makes it extremely risky/highly speculative investment not necessarily easy to steal

The link is to a post on a Facebook group. The contents of the post has nothing to do with Facebook the company...

Except it's even worse for crypto because many tokens don't nearly have the same liquidity as traditional stocks so market manipulation is even easier with crypto.