HN user

hdlothia

474 karma
Posts1
Comments223
View on HN

It is 100% allowed, I just don't think it's really helpful or beneficial for them or society

Especially when they try to lean on their status as scientists in order to try and have their opinions be more influential.

The cdc for example saying it's ok to disregard their previous guidance in order to protest for black lives matter is one of these credibility damaging moments that is hard to undo.

I have noticed that many people that I followed who announced departures have quietly come back and started tweeting again.

[dead] 1 year ago

I'm glad he stepped in and prevented the assault of a woman and her child. He made a mistake and should have let go earlier, but mistakes happen in the heat of charged situations. The cowards are the people who let a man with multiple assaults on women free into society.

[dead] 1 year ago

I am glad that he is landing on his feet after those reckless prosecutors tried to ruin his life.

1) I don't believe that this happened, people lie/embellish stories on the internet all the time.

2) I believe people have the right to free association. I wouldn't fire someone for saying retarded, but people like forever_wario have the right to live their values.

3) Using politically controversial language in white collar working places that are traditionally woke or woke leaning is asking for trouble.

Professors, judges, lawyers, journalists, politicians, tech moderators, probably anything in the arts or education. On reddit and bluesky you can get banned for having the median voter's opinion on gender norms and immigration.