hckrnrd

QQ is your insight from first-hand experience using it in an enterprise production environment? If not, then how did you get to this realization?

As a tick jockey myself, reading futures markets are like reading tomorrow’s NYT headline. These markets portend events with uncanny accuracy.

Energy and Materials were among the most notionally net sold US sectors this week, GS Prime Book: US Long/Short Ratio (MV) driven by both short and long sales. Collectively, this week's $ net selling across the two sectors was the *largest since April '25* and ranks in the 96th percentile vs. the past five years.

9-0 opinion [https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1239_onjq.pdf]

What struck me most about this one is that it spoke much more about the professional life then about the personal one.

I was thinking the same thing when reading the man’s reflection focused so much on his personal accolades and so little on what David Brooks calls “eulogy values.” But to each their own.

Tony Baloney

+1

See my comment as well. The evidence PG uses to support his claim the New York Times has done this massive ideological shift is completely undone in his ninth footnote, that says the throw-away line in the article might not have even been reviewed by a senior editor. Yet PG still has gall to state it as fact.

So if one takes PG seriously, it’s ludicrous for him to unequivocally say “On October 11, 2020 the New York Times announced that "The paper is in the midst of an evolution from the stodgy paper of record into a juicy collection of great narratives.", but then in the footnotes backtrack and say “It's quite possible no senior editor even approved it (the quote in question).”

Making such an absurd claim brings into question everything written on a subject he clearly knows nothing about.

Selling order flow is a related but distinct practice:

- Order Flow Sales: This involves brokers selling information about their customers’ orders to interested parties.

- Potential for Front-Running: While not inherently front-running, selling order flow can enable it if the buyers use this information to trade ahead of customer orders.

- Payment for Order Flow: This practice allows some brokers to offer commission-free trades, as they make money by routing orders to specific market makers.

Front-runners do take on some risk, but it’s typically minimal:

- Speed: Modern front-running often occurs using high-frequency trading algorithms, minimizing the time between the front-runner’s trade and the large order execution.

- Committed Orders: Front-runners act on knowledge of committed orders, not mere possibilities. They have an informational advantage.

Let's imagine a bustling farmer's market where market makers are savvy fruit stand owners, and regular traders are shoppers. Here's how the market makers might "front run" orders to make arbitrage profits:

## The Fruit Stand Scenario

Imagine you're at a large farmer's market with numerous fruit stands. You're looking to buy a crate of apples, and you ask a friendly fruit stand owner, Citadel, for the price.

*The Setup:* - You want to buy a crate of apples - Citadel’s stand is selling apples for $50 per crate - There's another stand nearby selling for $48, but it's not immediately visible

*The Front-Running Process:*

1. *Information Advantage:* Citadel, being a regular at the market, knows about the nearby stand selling apples for $48.

2. *Customer's Intent:* When you ask Citadel for the price, they realizes you're likely to buy a crate.

3. *Quick Action:* Before quoting you a price, Citadel quickly sends his assistant to buy a crate from the $48 stand.

4. *Price Quote:* Citadel then tells you his price is $50 per crate, which you accept.

5. *Fulfillment:* Citadel’s assistant returns with the $48 crate, which Citadel then sells to you for $50.

6. *Profit:* Citadel pockets the $2 difference as profit, without ever risking his own inventory.

## The Market Making Parallel

In the financial markets, this process happens at lightning speed:

1. Market makers see incoming orders before they're fully processed.

2. They quickly buy or sell ahead of large orders on other exchanges.

3. They then fulfill the original order at a slightly worse price.

4. The profit comes from the price difference between exchanges.

This practice, while controversial, is often justified by market makers as providing liquidity and tighter spreads. However, it can be seen as unfair to traders who may not get the best possible price for their orders.

There’s a reason he’s known as Scamath Palihapitiya amongst most serious traders. Dude is a joke.

tell us how you __really__ feel

there are huge populations of arabs that live peacefully in Israel so this apartheid narrative is complete nonsense.

For many, the narrative has superseded reality. And that’s the crux of the issue. If only more people had your level of willingness to explore the facts on the ground with their own eyes. Thank you so much for sharing your perspective.

Now, I wonder if this isn’t just a pot-calling-the-kettle-black comment. Who’s the crank? Who’s the satirist?

Given the authoritarian nature of country, conflating “Russians” with Putin may be detrimental toward reconciliation.

This is a great point! Without verifying the entity on the other end of the line and the risk that my words could be used against me—and my loved ones—I’d toe the line and parrot back the official position of the corrupt gov’t. What’s the upside to speak out with some random SMS?

Israaid, an NGO providing humanitarian aid, is already providing relief services. » https://www.israel21c.org/israaid-ceo-ukraine-crisis-is-the-...

when https://twitter.com/cavallokristen referenced the slide numbers from the pitch deck and dates the client reviewed, that’s basically saying COIN stole the idea. I wonder if they tried to settle this amicably, before taking it to Twitter. If there never was attempt to resolve this in private, that would seem like poor form.

DDC (dollar-denominated currency). That’s why. No such thing as a Zimbabwean denominated currency. That the rest of the world uses USD is the reason.

At some point Jordan Peterson lost his way. Not sure if was due to his substance abuse issues or what, but he’s no longer relevant.

I wholeheartedly agree. Compared to ToS and IB, RH makes derivative gambling a blast. At least the platform calls a spade a spade—it’s not for the boggle heads, but rather for those interested in taking on risk. And if your investment time horizon is measured in decades, instead of years, it makes perfect sense to me.

As papi used to say, “follow the money.” If you’re a retailer, why not raise prices and blame inflation? I’m not saying increased labor costs and higher costs for raw materials don’t play into the equation, but if I can charge $7 for a gallon of milk instead of $6.50 and pocket the extra $0.50, seems like a good deal to me!

As this reorg was Ruth’s Noogler project, she came from the investment banking world where seeking alpha is the name of the game…so making bets to yield alpha is pretty much what the company does.

This is my sense too. Disrupting the legacy financial industry took moxie. And no doubt ruffled quite a few feathers. The big guys would love if HOOD failed miserably as a public company, so I’m cautious to invest. But the economics of the service are brilliant. HOOD is a money printing machine run by psychopaths—sounds like a win to me.

HOOD won’t be part of the S&P 500 index. Not sure what you mean?

Sounds like you’re speaking from personal experience.

That others don’t see the blatant hypocrisy of the gambling/investing false dichotomy speaks more to their _own_ biases.

Through technology—global connectivity, mobile accessibility, and apps like Robinhood and their global counterparts—there’s no reason to expect the demand to wane.

https://amp.scmp.com/business/article/3119779/futu-restore-t...

Can you define “smart crowd”? It seems like all large gatherings are by definition “dumb” due to group dynamics that add friction to challenge existing norms. The “smartest crowd” may be the America due to the freedoms to create as many crowds—within reason—as one wants. A crowd of crowds as it were.

While SpaceX is in the news, there’s also the Amazon LEO initiative: Project Kuiper. They’ve received FCC approval and have access to Blue Origin rockets to launch.