Looks like we are at the end of the frontier-level models at subscription pricing. After this grace period, it will be double the cost at paid-per-token usage. I’m counting on the other models to compete at the subscription level and I need my harness to be agnostic. I need an AI harness that lets me switch LLM models dynamically depending on the task.
That video is a perfect description. Hard disk drives are incredible machines, going through many steps to produce the platter. The flying head is also fascinating. To this day I have full working hard drives over over twenty years old, while my SSDs have gone kaput.
The Bay Area used to be the center of these companies’ manufacturing and I was there when they literally unbolted the Varian sputter machines from my company to ship to Malaysia. The likes of Seagate, Western Digital, Conner, Quantum, Maxtor, Micropolis, Hitachi, Fujitsu, IBM, Read-Rite. Also Iomega in Utah. They were all here. They all left practically overnight. They were executive decisions. It was a shocking move and the whole history would make a good documentary or movie.
In my first internship, with a hard disk drive company, I learned how to use an Atomic Force Microscope to measure the roughness of the hard drive platter (the disk). The texture variation is in the order of angstroms or nanometers. It’s incredible how the AFM works like the needle of a record player, not via optics, and sensing at the atomic level.
I agree with your example about a deterministic answer but what I’m looking for is deterministic process. I seek the LLM’s opinion, not a boolean answer. For example, having an agentic skill or hook to do a SWOT analysis may one day (out of 1000 consistent days) result in the agent just produce S-W-O and no T in the process because it was simply context muddled that day.
With statements like that, if it’s been going on that long then it’s either our culture and normal way of life or you’re on some QAnon cuckoo rabbit hole.
We saw some of this behavior in the last administration too.
Can we stop with this bothsides-ing. The level of co-opting by this administration is unprecedented. There’s the strong-arming to get Intel equity stake, Nvidia/AMD revenue share, U.S. Steel golden share, Lithium Americas equity stake, Big Law pro bono pledges, TikTok forcible acquisition, Paramount-CBS-Skydance favor, it’s just unbelievable the stark use of power.
Hi Boris. Love the velocity of features. Are you planning on adding a secrets manager? Enterprise workflows almost always require an encrypted parameter or calling a secret.
Harness engineering is a moat. There’s user loyalty and reliance on the chassis that Claude is on, for example, just like there’s more market share by MacOS+WindowsOS over Linux Open Source.
Interesting that MCP was mentioned over CLI. For production or controlled environments, I would not make MCP the deployment path. I would let MCP help generate or choose commands, but have the actual deployment go through CLI scripts, Git commits, and CI/CD approval.