hasch

Article mentions 2016 somewhere. They explain a bit on top of that, with more depth ... at least my rough take on this

Well, I guess the truth is, personal data of EU and US citizens is sent in secret to european agencies all the time. Such institutions are all exempt from GDPR.

there are strong fundamentals. maybe they're not strong for you, but hey, that's why there is a market. nobody forces you to believe in it...

CoCalc isn't so famous for latex editing, but it has a proper Linux terminal with pandoc. That allows you to automate some tasks, etc.

the issue could be that they signal bip91, it's going to be activated, but they aren't running the actual code for rejecting the non segwit blocks

which continent and fiat currency?

GCE's Nearline maybe?

citation?

this is all an estimate. it's comprised of trading (to and from exchanges), sure, but also mining rewards, etc. there are some orgs analyzing the data, e.g. www.chainalysis.com

no, this ML level still statistical inference. next step is about structure and generalization.

with ETH you have to understand, that a lot of capital influx goes into ICOs. They need ETH as a token. It will take months or even a year to play out these ICOs and not all of them will be profitable. That's when the ICO bubble deflates.

Someone could always go to https://coinmarketcap.com/ and (sorted by market cap) buy the top N weighted by their current market cap relative to each other. I would say there is no real need for an index at all.

Yes, that jupyter+react implementation will be open source. It's not clear though how the feature parity will be. At least the document is exactly the same.

I bet you can get plenty of support for MySQL or Postgres

here is sagemath

    m = matrix([[0, 1, 0],
                [0, 0, 1],
                [1, 0, 0]])
    v = vector([2, 3, 1])
    m \ v

and then

    sol = m \ v
    m * sol

I think in this case, it's more like there are "independent" recruiters with their fixed Q&A sheets sitting around, somewhere, and fishing around for possible candidates to make it to a second level.

Just FWIW, about 5 years ago someone also contacted me for a google interview. The questions were very similar, so I'm not surprised. I don't know what's going on behind the scenes, but after a few mins I didn't took the call serious any more and in the end after 30 min it felt more like a way too long prank call.

can you give me an example? I did all sorts of numerical indexing programming, from fortran, matlab, python/numpy and R, and I am definitely more comfortable with 0 based indexing.

Sorry for being old and still living in the Python world: I would like to see an additional benchmark for this based on Python+Numba.

In general, I don't like those X-to-Y translation pages, when the underlying concepts fundamentally change. You can't use your existing sql mindset to translate to their query language, but instead try to learn from scratch.

FlossOffice? even stranger, and make sure to use it at least once a day :-)

sagemath is such a distribution, but also a rather thick layer of algorithms on top of that. many of them are actually written in cython, to make them fast and to have a good binding with those libraries, etc.

almost none, because sagemath more or less switched to use jupyter as its graphical notebook interface. technically, there is a small preparser (for a little bit of syntax sugar on top of python) and some deeper integration of the plotting capabilities.

as someone who has been at their workshops, there are ideas to do that. the goal is to have a semantic database, with a 3form ontology.

look at these slides of the open dreamkit project: http://opendreamkit.org/meetings/2016-01-25-DKS/Kohlhase_sli... ... somewhere there lmfdb should be mentioned

I think, it's an instance of a mathematical "idea". E.g. 7 is an object of the idea "prime numbers".

The simple reason for mathjax is,that it is the only one that has many of the required features and it works across browsers. MathML can't deliver any of that...

best counter "proof" that he isn't satoshi is the source code. compare this html5-masterpiece to the first bitcoin.org website: http://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/http://bitcoin.org...

I doubt the real satoshi would have started to learn sophisticated html in the past 7 years

good point, but a mining monopoly would destroy the value and hence it's in the self-interest of miners to be diversified. that's an economical self-correcting mechanism on top of this technical mining/reward feedback mechanism.

miners do more than just burning energy, and without this mechanism, the price can't be justified. a really forward looking perspective is, how a structure on top could be created to leverage bitcoin without mining. if you figure out something clever, you can call yourself the saviour of the planet :-)

that the government will get rid of this law

germany has a separation of powers and merkel can't dictate any laws.