HN user

handol

327 karma
Posts1
Comments112
View on HN

The detonation produces higher pressure and temperature, causing higher exhaust gas velocities. More energy in the exhaust means more push from the same amount of propellant. About 15% more. The other yet to be realized in practice advantage is that by eliminating the compressor stages on a rocket engine its construction is simplified, and despite needing a much stronger combustion chamber, it could actually be lighter.

If it can live up to more efficient, cheaper, and lighter then it will certainly see widespread use.

There are bound to be issues with new larger designs, but nothing show stopping is expected.

Most companies decided to just pull diesel cars from the US market, and it turns out that all of the ones that stayed were tricking the tests in one way or another.

That's just not true. There were three options, stop selling diesels, implement a selective catalytic reduction system, cheat the test. All three were done.

I'm actually surprised that there isn't more direct action against overly aggressive drivers.

What direction action could a cyclist take on a car driver that intentionally buzzed them while passing? I suppose if you happen to catch up to them at a light you could vandalize their car. Make a habit of doing that and you'll wind up the victim of an unfortunate accident that no one will be punished for.

I think it really boils down to, they need a near future myth for investors to speculate their stock price up. That myth is, ubiquitous, always-on AR is just around the corner, and they're going to be the platform it runs on.

We know what happens to matter at those speeds, it becomes infinitely "heavy" and would experience time in relative light-years (I mean time-to-travel at light speeds) no?

I don't think we do know what happens. Relativistic mass approaches infinity at exactly c. Beyond c we obviously have no data, but if we just apply the same equations the relativistic mass would drop back to a finite value. A finite complex value.

Isn't getting where you're going in less time the whole point of going fast? Why would you want to use a device that made your journey take longer?

It was never a stipulation of warp drives that they would cause something to move.

The name was lifted from a very well known science fiction universe, where it has exactly that stipulation. As a result it carries that implication for (the vast majority of) readers when it shows up on IFLScience or whatever.

The field can't help being click bait with a name so loaded with implications that the work does not back up.

e.g. that the warp fields studied would be capable of causing something to move.

You can still raise sentient animals for slaughter, it's pretty far from being a legal person. Other animals in the sentient legal category include all vertebrates.

OpenWorm 5 years ago

Would you believe that a text-to-speech program was suffering if it told you so?

The quote (referring to a presentation on surface disinfectant studies):

I asked Bill a question that probably some of you are thinking of, if you're totally into that world, which I find to be very interesting. So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous—whether it's ultraviolet or just very powerful light—and I think you said that that hasn't been checked, but you're going to test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you're going to test that too. It sounds interesting…

And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that. So, that, you're going to have to use medical doctors with. But it sounds—it sounds interesting to me.

That conversion is done by a crankshaft and once a crankshaft is in the system ... you get diminished efficiency because you're only getting maximum shove force in the middle of the piston stroke.

I don't think that's right. Why would diminished force when the piston is turning around lead to a power loss?

I think the Tesla "Tiles" of 25 D1 chips are on a single wafer with integrated interconnects. But there is certainly a huge difference in the memory bandwidth claims. Cerebras claims 20PB/s, and Tesla claims 10Tbps.

Doesn't that mean that warp drives are not possible? I mean if the device can't produce a driving force why call it a "drive"?