hallihax

Just dropping a comment to say congrats for getting something up and running and that it's nice to see somebody doing something for the elderly and those less technically proficient.

Here in the UK the same problems exist regarding general ease-of-use, scams, and ability to navigate tech in general: and we also have a signficiant (and growing) problem where government services and support are all being moved online, with seemingly little support for those who find modern tech difficult to engage with.

Though my gut feeling says you may struggle to build a viable long-term business around this: I really do hope you succeed!

Personally I think governments and institutions need to radically improve things for the non-techies amongst us and those who find it difficult, whether cognitively or physically, to engage with tech in the first place. Right now it seems that the default assumption is that everybody is perfectly fine using a website or app, and if you're not, you're out of luck!

The 'tailored music' scenario suggested in this paper doesn't require any kind of NFT, let alone an 'iNFT'.

If ever there was a solution looking for a problem, this is it.

This is great and all, but the merge process is still messy as hell

Very timely post for me - as this is exactly what I'm trying to achieve at my own place :P I've forwarded it to several people to help bolster my argument, so thanks!

We also scrutinise every aspect of how we work; it doesn't mean that there's a viable remote-only replacement for everything a team might need to do.

Your anecdote is not data - it's just an anecdote.

C'mon - if we can make it work then you can make it work.

If this was a reasonable argument, nobody would ever have any issues!

I think it largely depends on what the work actually involves. For me - I personally don't like working from home. I need the separation between my place of work and my place of rest, but I fully appreciat that this is my own personal view and not everybody shares it.

However, my actual job requires a lot of communication - some of it is perfectly ok to do remotely via calls etc, but a significant portion of my job involves ad-hoc discussions, whiteboarding, throwing ideas around and coming up with a solution to a problem that is highly specific to our domain. This is the problem area, for me - I've found no combination of tools that adequately plugs the gaps that remote working has left in our ability to have those kinds of conversations / design sessions - and certainly no combination that everyone 'gels' with.

For me, it's a major issue. Productivity in those area has absolutely tanked. Pre-planned, pre-determined work is generally ok, but the more informal side of things - which is actually probably around 50% of what we actually need to do in order to keep things moving, has gone to hell, which now means we ask people to come in at least a few days a week to try to plug the gaps.

The 'bare minimum to not get fired' is the expectation of any job.

If the employer wants to increase the expectations levelled on employees, then they should write it into their contracts. No contract? No expectations.

You can't hold people to some abstract set of expectations that are never written down anywhere; and if you try - well that's why they have to invent a stupid term like 'quiet quitting'.

I recently set up NextCloud on a Raspberry Pi and found the process a little more convoluted than I would have liked - but that was mostly because the linuxserver.io image for MariaDB seemed to have some problems during database initialisation which I couldn't figure out. I switched over to use the yobasystems/alpine-mariadb image and that worked flawlessly. I haven't tried syncing contacts or calendar yet but that wasn't really my primary motivation - I just wanted self-hosted files with a nice interface. The NextCloud UX is a little clunky imo but I'm not complaining - it's a great piece of software especially considering the price tag! I also am trying to do open-source everything so it is very attractive in that regard.

If banks simply refused to implement stupid and ineffective rules, no government is going to shut them down.

Nice organisational simplicity would be to simply not have any special rules for the unvaccinated in the first place

It's not black and white; a lost year of education is a terrible thing on its own in terms of future prospects - but kids need to be around their peers for reasons that go beyond academic success. Lengthy periods of isolation are normally considered a punishment for a reason. It's not supposed to last indefinitely or be a constant threat based on factors they can't control, and appeals to the greater good can only be justified for so long (and only when the effects of the restrictions put in place are actually effective and not overridden by other harms they may cause).

I don't think a cover letter is necessary - but being able to demonstrate that you can write thoughtfully and clearly is always going to be a plus imo, whatever the job entails. There are very few roles in which decent communication skills have no value.

Politics aside, I wonder how this will impact China's game industry in 15-20 years? Though I do think game addiction (particular in the era of microtransactions etc) is something which we should be wary of and try to assist people with; I also think the route from 'kid playing games' to 'adult making games' is one in which 'They played lots of games for hours throughout childhood' is likelt a universally safe assumption.

I've experienced this before; my recommendation would be to pitch an alternative tool to the PM based on how that tool would make the PM's job easier / more effective. It's probably true that almost anything would be better suited to the development workflow than an Excel spreadsheet - but in this particular use-case, Excel is fulfilling your PM's requirements: it's keeping track of issues.

What Excel won't do, without significant work (which will almost certainly fall to the developer and not the PM):

Track issue history / comments / activity against a repository. Wouldn't it be better for your PM to be able to identify, at a glance, exactly which branch & commit a particular fix or change is in?

Integrate with your CI / build system: Wouldn't it be better for your PM if issues were automatically marked as 'ready to test' when the relevant build is completed?

Provide a workflow against the list of active issues. Wouldn't it better for your PM to rest assured that any incoming issues are easily triaged & assigned within a well-defined workflow that tracks an issue from first-report to completion & sign-off?

Don't fight them - sell to them. Explain why a different solution will be better for them and you.

I'm not aware of any actual data on this, but it seems to me that those who choose not to be vaccinated are probably also very unlikely to be tested on any regular basis (if at all), and also (at least in the UK, where I am) not engage in any kind of voluntary contact tracing.

There seems to me to be a gap between what people think is happening, and what is actually happening. How exactly are people who haven't tested positive for Covid (either through a negative result, or simply avoiding testing altogether) going to be identified as the source of an outbreak if they're also not engaging in contact tracing in the first place?

As it stands, it seems to me like the most likely people to be contact traced are those who are also testing regularly, and are also the most likely to be vaccinated. I would be surprised if non-vaccinated people are anything but rarely identified as the source of an outbreak, precisely because they're also much less likely to ever get tested (unless seriously ill) or engage in contact tracing.

Whilst I don't think there's any particular problem with building tech to help the government / military run simulations etc; I do think it should be made clear to employees what their work will be used for; especially if they are building some part of a tech stack that will be used for a project built by Unity the company itself. Whilst nobody can really expect Unity to police the projects of external developers - it seems a little disingenuous for Unity to conflate every project made using Unity with projects explicitly built by Unity themselves.

"We believe in the freedom of expression, and as the Unity engine is a tool, a tool that can be downloaded and used by most anyone, it’s impossible to truly police or censor all uses of it," Unity said.

From a technical perspective I don't believe greater transparency is an impossible ask, nor even something which should cause any significant amount of administrative overhead. I'm not saying Unity staff should walk out of the job over it - but it does seem to me like there's an ethical concern here that it is within Unity's power to provide greater transparency over, without revealing the specific detail of projects.

Ultimately I doubt Unity is going to stop working on government military / contracts; it's up to employees to decide where their ethical line is; but I do think Unity should make it as easy as possible for their own employees to determine whether they're overstepping that line.

I'd argue that a 'strict lockdown' is, in itself, rather draconian. Almost by definition, it requires heavy policing of an individual's life and almost total surveillance of their movements.

If by 'strict lockdown' you mean 'Ask people to limit their movements and preferably just stay at home' then maybe that's not quite so draconian.

Perhaps you should - if we all did, we'd reduce the spread massively.

The more I learn about what's been done to this poor woman, the more disgusted I become; time and time again it appears that people have exploited her and made her life hell for personal gain.

Nature abhors two things that humans adore: straight lines, and walls.

All kinds of innovative solutions to contain ecological damage have come and gone, and will continue to come and go - but there's no working around nature. Everything we do will be undone by nature at some point; probably sooner rather than later. Ultimately, the only thing 'containment' does is just make it somebody else's problem in the future.

I don't think there's any realistic prospect of 'safely' containing anything in the ocean - possibly some kind of tethered buoyant container might be a useful innovation for the immediate future, but it's not going to be a permanent solution, and our best bet is to massively reduce the damage we do in the first place rather than keep kicking the can down the road.

Even the continents will be destroyed and renewed ultimately - perhaps our best long-term bet is to try to manually send the 'bad stuff' down into the outer core and just let it be obliterated and recycled.

First: Check your contract.

Many companies include clauses about owning work you do whilst employed by the company, not simply work you do in relation to your employment at the company, or on company time. Whether that's enforceable or not in your case I don't know - your best bet is to seek solid legal advice before moving forward, whatever path you choose. If the lawyer you've spoken to can't provide clarity, find another lawyer.

Second: Stop working on it until you have clarity. Back everything up, secure it all.

You've already opened the Pandora's box; your company is most likely expecting you to play ball with their plans, for better or worse. Don't make your situation more complicated by continuing to work on this until you know what's coming. Protect what you've got, and don't make things harder for yourself by implementing new IP / ideas / features whilst this is all up in the air.

Third: Exploit your leverage.

You have something they want. Use it to your advantage. Be nice, but firm. It's your baby, and you want it to be treated right. Whether it goes forward under your own steam, or in-house at your company; weigh up the pros and cons of each and make the situation work for you rather than against you.

About time - the death of the 'gig economy' can't come quickly enough.

I think those fears are entirely understandable - but this is the system working as intended. The problem is not that social media is allowed to do what it does (i.e. give everyone a platform); the problem is that capital has warped the public realm such that a handful of gigantic social media corporations have captured a substantial proportion of the world's attention.

The solution is, imo, to break those corporations up - to ensure competition and to break open these walled gardens which allow nonsense to thrive.

I would seriously hazard against any attempt to restrict individual freedoms regarding free speech. The US, for all its problems - is significantly better than many countries on earth in terms of the ability for any random citizen to say what they like without fear of retribution. Granting politicians and mega-corporations the right and ability to effectively negate entire sets of views and opinions will only ultimately benefit the worst people on earth.

It's a tricky problem but to my mind the issue is one of forcing capitalism to fulfil its promise; competition is the key to preventing tyranny in a capitalist system.

I haven't downvoted you - and there's no spin.

Just because people with vested interests in destroying journalism keep saying that journalists talking with your political opponents is some sign of underhanded activity, it doesn't make it true.

I don't see any problem whatsoever with a journalistic organisation approaching potential sources, no. How else do you imagine this works?

This is called 'cultivating sources', not 'collusion'. In any case, the conversations led to nothing. WL wanted info and data - which is their trade, and to boost the reach and impact of their publications; again, completely normal.

What's the problem, exactly?

Well exactly - this is the problem. When reporting documented, verifiable evidence is treated as 'political activism by journalists', everyone should be worried.

Assange is on record dismissing both candidates in the 2016 election as terrible choices, and the DNC / Clinton documents WL released also included oppo-research on Trump.

Wikileaks publications preceding and during the 2016 campaigns weren't targeted at damaging Clinton, as much as the Clinton camp and its surrogates like to claim. It was about informing the public, which is exactly what journalism is supposed to do. What people subsequently do with that information is entirely up to them.

Good on your brother - hope it helps after his release. It'd probably be an interesting read if you helped him set up a blog about his self-education whilst incarcerated!