HN user

hall_999

3 karma
Posts0
Comments7
View on HN
No posts found.
[dead] 10 years ago

The bias here on HN means that this will get flagged and nobody will care.

Every single media outlet in the US has been publishing at least one negative article about Trump/day and you want more?

I actually want to see less-biased media. I rarely see negative articles about Clinton and when the mainstream media covers something up, it's like they are all reading from the same playbook. The words are very similar.

The last set of wikileaks showed us that most of the mainstream media are an extension of the DNC. They first destroyed Sanders (an enemy of Clinton) and now they are trying to destroy Trump.

I also find it interesting that nobody cares that the majority of these Trump leaks are the result of illegal wiretapping. Yet, when there are wikileaks, we nees to focus on illegal russian hackers and not the content of the leaks.

It's scary to think that illegal activity is perfectly acceptable...as long as it is hurting someone you don't like.

This would work well....until the Republicans start winning. Then the Democrats will somehow deem it unfair.

It might make it somewhat easier to vote third-party, but the main reason third-party candidates don't win is because they just don't have enough support. Usually because they either don't have enough cash, connections, or have views that are too esoteric.

It's the same reason why Walmart is the most popular, but your favorite, better, local store is always scraping by.

It will also mean that third-party candidates can now be used as a tool to get main candidates elected. They will be controlled.