grepsedawk

I audit engineering teams for a living and see this constantly: a 6 person team running ceremonies lifted from whatever 400 person org the founders came from, and nobody can say what coordination problem any of it solves. Adding a process is easy, killing one is somehow a whole political project.

Lol! I was baited into clicking this one. Cute title

This is pretty cool, thanks for sharing. It really enables less tech savvy users. It would really enable frontpage/dreamworks-like flows for some people

This is so sick!

If you use arch but you are forced to be on a mac for any reason, this will make you hate yourself less.

Wrapping these in a TUI is on my list. Haven't built it yet.

Good catch. The word boundary syntax isn't portable across platforms. I reverted to the simpler version that works everywhere.

Sure, normalizing by size would be more precise. But this is a quick gut check to know which files to look at first, not a metric.

Fair point. I skip lockfiles, changelogs, and generated code. The first application file on the list is the one that matters. Should have been explicit about that in the post.

Only two of the five depend on commit messages. Churn, authorship, and velocity work regardless. Even teams with terrible hygiene write "fix" when something breaks.

Big projects tend to self-correct. These commands hit differently on private codebases with 3-10 contributors, where high-churn usually means one person patching the same thing repeatedly.

Good catch, that's better

Very happy to hear!

Is this the same DPI device that snoops on DNS to shape bandwidth?

Nope... The packets need to be sealed back together, at that point the data is denormalized and you can't measure how much it "actually" counted.

It's delivered alongside the webpage so there's no technical way to split the data logically... Unless they're using "rough math".

yes

yes

I was wondering about this too. Honestly just https and at least you're gtg.

RT'd

I agree, but I still think it's "better"

IMHO getting redirected would be WIDELY more acceptable than injecting content.

Hahaha they have mixed content

One of the things I tried really hard to do is make the HTML _really_ clean for things like this. Is reader mode "really good" or do you think it loads very nicely because of the work we put in to make the HTML nice?

Twitter thread: https://twitter.com/grepsedawkward/status/118922234976323584...

Oh okay! I just wanted to make sure there wasn't anything I could do to make this a better experience for you! Enjoy.

Javascript is in the blog post

I'm paying plenty for internet. It's simple really, transmit my packet from point a to point b. Don't mutate it.

DPI units can unwrap and re-wrap SSL

Does your browser not load <noscript>?