HN user

georgecmu

21,116 karma

Write to me at go.shen+hn@gmail.com

Posts2,458
Comments522
View on HN
en.wikipedia.org 3d ago

Starfish Prime

georgecmu
2pts0
newbedfordlight.org 26d ago

The tick that makes you allergic to meat is spreading across Massachusetts

georgecmu
5pts1
philkoopman.substack.com 1mo ago

A Third Strike for Waymo on Failed Quick Fixes

georgecmu
1pts0
news.mit.edu 1mo ago

Neutron star collisions are a "goldmine" of heavy elements, study finds (2021)

georgecmu
3pts0
www.bbc.com 1mo ago

Flesh-eating screwworm arrives in US with first case in Texas

georgecmu
7pts0
www.reuters.com 1mo ago

'Coda vs. Goodyear': Indefiniteness destroys trade secrets

georgecmu
3pts0
cdh.princeton.edu 2mo ago

The Incompatibilities Between Generative AI and Art: Q&A with Ted Chiang

georgecmu
4pts2
americanaffairsjournal.org 2mo ago

Understanding the LLM Bubble

georgecmu
8pts6
www.nytimes.com 2mo ago

We Traced U.S. Government Gold to a Drug Cartel

georgecmu
9pts0
www.theguardian.com 2mo ago

Grok plays along with researchers pretending to be delusional

georgecmu
3pts1
www.merckmanuals.com 3mo ago

How Are Calories in Foods Measured?

georgecmu
1pts0
koreastampsociety.org 3mo ago

The Kyonghung Cover: The Rarest Item of the Joseon Postal Administration

georgecmu
3pts0
en.wikipedia.org 3mo ago

Core Rope Memory

georgecmu
6pts0
www.bbc.com 3mo ago

US plans to automatically register young men for military draft

georgecmu
50pts62
www.terrybisson.com 3mo ago

RSVP to the FBI

georgecmu
3pts0
www.cnn.com 3mo ago

Italian Americans moved to Italy. Then Italy said they couldn't stay

georgecmu
4pts1
www.npr.org 3mo ago

Connecticut law lets lenders go after small businesses nationwide

georgecmu
3pts0
en.wikipedia.org 4mo ago

Change Blindness

georgecmu
2pts0
www.theguardian.com 4mo ago

He wanted to use ChatGPT to create sustainable housing. It took over his life

georgecmu
31pts3
catalog.archives.gov 4mo ago

Private Motion Pictures of Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun

georgecmu
5pts0
www.msn.com 4mo ago

Russian mathematician finds new approach to 190-year-old 'eternal' math problem

georgecmu
2pts0
en.wikipedia.org 5mo ago

Hanafuda

georgecmu
1pts0
en.wikipedia.org 5mo ago

Great Kantō Earthquake

georgecmu
1pts0
www.nytimes.com 5mo ago

Michael Beck, 65, Dies; First to Report Symptoms of 'Havana Syndrome'

georgecmu
2pts0
par.nsf.gov 5mo ago

Observation of Strong Nonreciprocal Thermal Emission

georgecmu
2pts1
arxiv.org 6mo ago

The unreasonable effectiveness of pattern matching

georgecmu
2pts0
archive.vogue.com 6mo ago

The Godfather – Vogue Movie Review – May 1972

georgecmu
3pts1
phys.org 6mo ago

Real-life experiment proves Bohr right in theoretical debate with Einstein

georgecmu
5pts0
www.heinzhistorycenter.org 6mo ago

The Vietnam War: The Press on the Front Lines

georgecmu
8pts0
www.sciencefriday.com 6mo ago

Questions for Jill Tarter, Astronomer (2014)

georgecmu
2pts0

The actual publication is available here: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adw9065

  The present study challenges the traditional view that the *respiration of 
  organic carbon to CO2* is an exclusively intracellular process, revealing that 
  *organic compound respiration can occur spontaneously in an extracellular 
  context in soils*.
On the surface, it looks like they rediscovered that oxidation of organic / carbonaceous compounds occurs at low temperatures independently of presence of living organisms. The real contribution of the paper would be in elucidation of the specific mechanisms of oxidation of these organic compounds (e.g. via abiotic catalysis).

Compare to this paper from 2003:

https://sci-hub.kvnp.top/10.1016/s0360-1285(03)00042-x

  Coal oxidation at low temperatures is the major heat source responsible for 
  the self-heating and spontaneous combustion of coal and is an important source 
  of greenhouse gas emissions. This review focuses on the chemical reactions 
  occurring during low-temperature oxidation of coal. Current understanding 
  indicates that this process involves consumption of O2, formation of solid 
  oxygenated complexes, thermal decomposition of solid oxygenated complexes and 
  generation of gaseous oxidation products. Parameters, such as mass change, 
  heat release, oxygen consumption, and formation of oxidation products in the 
  gas or solid phase, have been used to qualitatively and quantitatively 
  describe the oxidation process. Reaction mechanisms have been proposed to 
  explain the characteristics of consumption of O2, and formation of oxidation 
  products in the gas and solid phases. Various kinetic models have also been 
  developed to describe the rate of oxygen consumption and the rates of 
  formation of gaseous oxidation products in terms of the rate parameters of the 
  relevant reactions, oxidation time, temperature, and initial concentration of 
  oxygen in the oxidising medium.

Full text: https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/movies/the-godfather-arthur-sc...

The movie casts a spell far beyond its merits. Warner Brothers would have made it thirty-five years ago as a hundred-minute feature, lively, brilliantly paced, and economical. Now, in the reverent hands of Francis Ford Coppola, it has swelled into an overblown, pretentious, slow, and ultimately tedious three-hour quasi-epic. Gangsters at last have their Greatest Story Ever Told, but minus George Stevens. Inflation does not always assure survival. My guess is that three years from now we will still remember scenes from Raoul Walsh’s The Roaring Twenties (1939) while The Godfather will have become a vague memory.

PSA: If you are logged in to LinkedIn, then clicking on a LinkedIn profile registers your visit with the owner -- it's a great way for someone to harvest new people to target.

On another note, what's unreal about the pseudonym? It's a Ukrainian transliteration of Николай Янчий (Nikolay Yanchiy). Here's a real person with this name: https://life.ru/p/1490942

Never trust anything written by lawyers/economics/MBAs on climate change - only analysis by chemical or mechanical engineers is worth reading.

Just so we know if we should keep reading, which one are you?

Methane pyrolysis is an old technology from early days of oil refining for production of hydrogen & Ammonia/fertilizer/Methanol. it yields half as much H2 than SMR/ATR so it can't compete on cost, unless there is carbon tax/CO2 penalty.

It's not appropriate to call it "technology," in the same way it's not appropriate to call "combustion" a "technology." There's a very wide variety of technological solutions to realize this family of chemical processes, and some are going to be better than other, depending on the use case or scenario. The report actually covers those pathways reasonably well.

Also, coke produced by pyrolysis is lower quality than that produced by Delayed Coking of crude oil refining.

Ideally, you would not be producing coke at all, but a higher value material. However, even coke will be of much higher purity than petcoke (before calcining) -- i.e. it would be intrinsically zero-sulfur carbon material, - but I'm not sure what applications it would have that don't involve production of CO2.

But obviously the carbon co-product should have value, which would provide a cost offset to the hydrogen. With a high-quality co-product (> $1/kgC), this offset would be significant enough to provide that hydrogen essentially free of charge.

SMR and ATR generate significant amounts of CO2 (~10 kgCO2/kgH2), which does not provide a cost offset, and in a fair world would instead incur a significant added cost.

Electrolysis requires 4x more energy (also electric, not thermal) and does not have a marketable/valuable co-product. Just on the energy cost alone (50 kWh/kgH2 * 0.12 USD/kWh = 6 USD/kgH2 > 40 USD/MMBTU) electrolyzer hydrogen is not competitive with any of the above.

Commonsense should tell you e- generated by H2 can't compete with CH4, because Ch4 is the feedstock & H2 is the product!

Didn't parse this statement, sorry. Can you rephrase?

Water is critical but not hard to get.

Right. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_scarcity

You would want to use solar power for electrolysis. In the US, regions with abundant solar power are also the ones that: - have true water scarcity - Nevada and Arizona - have low population and industrial density, so any generated hydrogen would need transported to the point of use.

The bigger problem is the energy disparity. Electrolysis of water requires 50 kWh/kgH2 or more. Even a 70% efficient fuel cell would get ~25 kWh/kgH2 -- horrible roundtrip efficiency. With pyrolysis, that equation is exactly inverted: at 9-12 kWh/kgH2, you can generate excess electricity with no CO2 emissions.

Plus for pyrolysis, you have to deal with the carbon which makes up 75% of the methane by weight. A non-trivial issue.

Exactly. 20 kg of methane costs $3 today, but contains 15 kg of carbon that could be worth $20-$30. It's a non-trivial issue if you hate generating value.

https://www.chemanalyst.com/Pricing-data/carbon-black-42

You're not wrong, but you're not right either.

In 2015, the Department of Energy estimated that the CO2 footprint for production, processing, and pipeline transportation of natural gas averaged between 8 and 14 kgCO2-e per MMBTU of natural gas [1].

The average natural gas CO2 emissions (kgCO2/MMBTU) has been going down over time [2], and will be reduced even further in the next few years thanks to increasing fines [3] on one hand and financial incentives to reduce flaring and venting [4] on the other hand. A large percentage of these emissions are not due to accidental leaks, but are essentially intentional -- due to flaring, venting, and high-bleed controllers and actuators [2].

For an idea of how much emissions can be reduced, consider that the so-called certified gas has 90% lower CO2 footprint than the average today [5]. For example, the methane emissions for a natural gas utility in Oregon are 90% lower than EPA nationwide assumptions [6].

[1] https://greet.es.anl.gov/files/EERE-LCA-NG

[2] https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas...

[3] https://community.citizensclimate.org/resources/item/19/530#...

[4] https://www.epa.gov/inflation-reduction-act/methane-emission...

https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/documents/us...

[5] https://www.cfindustries.com/newsroom/2023/bp-certified-natu...

[6] https://www.nwnatural.com/about-us/environment/less-we-can

On the subject of methane pyrolysis, it turns out if you look at the Gibbs free energy calculation, about half of the energy of methane combustion is released from the formation of water, and the other half from the formation of carbon dioxide.

About 70% of the energy is in hydrogen, 30% is in carbon. 1 GJ of methane weighs about 20 kg, 5 kg of which comprise hydrogen. At 142 MJ/kgH2 (higher heating value, which implies condensation of the produced water), 710 MJ out of that 1 GJ is due to hydrogen.

With a 60%-70% efficient hydrogen fuel cell, about 50% of the electricity generated from hydrogen from pyrolysis of methane would drive the process, and 50% could go into the grid.

Pyrolysis is a less energy intensive way to produce hydrogen, and does deserve more attention. But it still requires methane as a feedstock.

So why is methane as feedstock a problem?

Isn't it better to spend less energy convert a ubiquitous, but environmentally harmful gas into hydrogen along with useful materials, than spend 4x more energy to convert a critical resource -- fresh water -- into hydrogen without any valuable by-products?

For whatever reason, evolution decided those wavelengths should be overlapping. For example, M cones are most sensitive to 535 nm light, while L cones are most sensitive to 560 nm light. But M cones are still stimulated quite a lot by 560 nm light—around 80% of maximum.

The reason is simple: genes coding the long wave opsins (light-sensitive proteins) in these cones have diverged from copies of the same original gene. The evolution of this is very interesting.

Mammals in general have only two types of cones: presumably they lost full color vision in the age of dinosaurs since they were primarily small nocturnal animals or lived in habitats with very limited light (subterranean, piles of leaves, etc.) Primates are the notable exception, and have evolved the third type of cone, enabling trichromatic color vision, as a result of their fruitarian specialization and co-evolution with the tropical fruit trees (same as birds, actually).

So, what's interesting is that New World and Old World primates evolved this cone independently. In Old World primates the third cone resulted from a gene duplication event on the X chromosome, giving rise to two distinct (but pretty similar) opsin genes, with sensitivity peaks at very close wavelengths. As a note, because these genes sit on the X chromosome, colorblindness (defects in one or both of these genes) is much more likely to happen in males.

New World primates have a single polymorphic opsin gene on the X chromosome, with different alleles coding for different sensitivities. So, only some (heterozygous) females in these species typically have full trichromatic vision, while males and the unlucky homozygous females remain dichromatic.

Decent wikipedia article on the subject: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_color_vision_in_p...

Types of opsins in vertebrates: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertebrate_visual_opsin

Uncut Currency 2 years ago

I replicated this 5-6 years back: got a sheet of $2 bills and perforated it myself.

Then I separated the large sheet into strips and gave them out as souvenirs to friends.

This is what a complete sheet folded up looked like: https://imgur.com/a/uCS5930

One particular take away for me was his finding that when the body enters a ketogenic state due to fasting the body produces defences that eat up cancer cells

As with everything, mileage will vary.

Pro: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6375425/

Contra: https://www.cancer.columbia.edu/news/study-finds-keto-diet-c...

“We did indeed see that the ketogenic diet suppressed tumor growth — but we also saw, surprisingly, that it promoted tumor metastasis,” says Gu. “That was really a shock to us.”

So I never looked into it closely, but I knew that the 3 and 15 kopeck coins had names of their own of Tatar origin, so it had to have had a long history.

According to wikipedia [1,2,3], as a physical coin it was minted periodically throughout Russian history. The Tatar origin of its informal historical name is either 'gold'[4] or 'six'[5].

It was last introduced in 1839-1841 and persisted into Soviet period, until 1991 when it was discontinued by the newly independent Russia. The 1/2/3/5 weight system had to be of the Soviet design, since the metric system was adopted following the Bolshevik revolution, but the weights and dimensions haven't changed since 1926 [6].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruble#Russia's_coins

[2] https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A2%D1%80%D0%B8_%D0%BA%D0%B...

[3] https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%BB%D1%82%D1%8B%D0%BD...

[4] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%82%D1%8B%D0%B...

[5] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%82%D1%8B

[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_ruble#Coins,_1924%E2%80...

Soviet coins (at least post 1961) were designed explicitly with this application in mind.

1, 2, 3, and 5 kopeck coins weighed their value in grams. They could also be used to estimate lengths; 1 kopeck was 15 mm in diameter and 5 kopeck was 25 mm.

I don't feel like doing a formal proof, but it looks like it should be a direct consequence of the pumping lemma: "Informally, it says that all sufficiently long strings in a regular language may be pumped—that is, have a middle section of the string repeated an arbitrary number of times—to produce a new string that is also part of the language." [1]

Needless to say, this exercise would be trivial if you just covered the pumping lemma and its applications in class, and next to impossible if you never heard of it.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumping_lemma_for_regular_lang...

PS. I took 15-251 back when it was 15-299: a brand new class without a regular number assignment. Honestly, I would have enjoyed it a lot more now than I did back then. But several assignments still stand out for me, in particular "Building from scratch" [2]. Trying to get some of that feeling now, working through Turing Complete[3] with my daughter.

[2] https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/academic/class/15299/handouts/...

[3] https://turingcomplete.game/

I had an interesting experience a few years back as a reviewer for proposals to NASA LuSTR program: https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/stmd/space-tech-research-g...

The topic was exactly that: landing pad preparation solutions. Here's a summary slide for one of the winning proposals: https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/lustr2021_qu...

The Autonomous Site Preparation: Excavation, Compaction, and Testing (ASPECT) Project will develop tools and methods to clear, level, and compact the lunar surface. ASPECT is a fully autonomous rover with equipment for regolith excavation, boulder moving, and surface compaction.

I'm disappointed the article neglects to mention the use of actual coal in Kingsford briquettes. I imagine charcoal alone would not be energy-rich enough to get the temperatures.

Anyway, the environmental permit applications for their plant in West Virginia (close proximity to coal) are available online and make for interesting reading: https://dep.wv.gov/daq/permitting/titlevpermits/Documents/Ma... https://dep.wv.gov/daq/permitting/titlevpermits/Documents/No...

For example, one can learn that their VOC emissions are in excess of 100 tons/year or that they can use 80,000 tons of coal per year. I guess folks that are willing to saturate their food in vapors of lighting fluid wouldn't care about a little bit of coal...

The comment for that particular problem also caught my eye. There's absolutely no need to remember radicals to solve it; just square both sides and compare.

Ancient Echoes 3 years ago

It would be more correct to say that some of these sw-words can also be found in or are related to Old Norse and modern Swedish words.

They come from Indo-European roots and are older than Old Norse or Old English. Cognates are also found in Slavic and Roman languages:

  sware - свара - sermone
  sweor/sweger - свекор/свекровь - suocero/suocera