gcau

just about _any_ excuse will get you out of the fine

Hilariously wrong, and if it were true it defeats the purpose of making it mandatory.

I find it hard to believe this comment isn't sarcastic. Apple's software, atleast in particular macos, is horrendous - to the point I ditched my m2 macbook for a thinkpad because of how bad it was. It's like a toy OS.

If they're intentionally causing the customer to have an unspendable balance, knowing that it's making them $200m/yr, how is that not fraud (or some kind of crime)? I'd expect atleast CA would do something about it.

I shouldn't have to explain this, but a letter is a medium of communication, that could just as easily be written by a LLM (and transcribed by a human onto paper).

If I have a VPS, what should I be running on it to replace github actions? (eg run tests, return pass/fail to github PR)

The poster you're replying to is plain wrong, using "class" is ubiquitously common in the javascript/typescript world, it's the idiomatic way to create classes, and it has better semantics than trying to use prototypes. You might compile away the class keyword for compatibility, though.

The 'rewrite it in lua' crowd are oddly silent now.

I'm a big fan of react, but all the server stuff was a cold hard mistake, it's only a matter of time before the (entire) react team realises it, assuming their nextjs overlords permit it.

Yea, I don't want something trying to emulate emotions. I don't want it to even speak a single word, I just want code, unless I explicitly ask it to speak on something, and even in that scenario I want raw bullet points, with concise useful information and no fluff. I don't want to have a conversation with it.

However, being more humanlike, even if it results in an inferior tool, is the top priority because appearances matter more than actual function.

Maybe a kid managing to struggle through a shitty school has to work harder

It sounds like you think admissions should be based on how hard people think they worked relative to others.

I'm not sure if they meet the requirements for being a terrorist group or if I agree with them being considered terrorists, but I just want to point out the name of the organisation isn't a valid argument in favour of them, the actions of the organisation matter a lot more than the name, for example on many occasions they've used violence to prevent people from political speech (is that antifascism or fascism?)

Humans are imperfect and anyone can make mistakes, yes. I would argue there's different categories of mistakes though, in terms of potential outcomes and how preventable they are. A maintainer with potentially millions of users falling for a simple phishing email is both preventable and has a very bad potential outcome. I think all parties involved could have done better (the maintainer/npm/the email client/etc) to prevent this.

"'such' a phishing attack" makes it sound like a sophisticated, indepth attack, when in reality it's a developer yet again falling for a phishing email that even Sally from finance wouldn't fall for, and although anyone can make mistakes, there is such a thing as negligent, amateur mistakes. It's astonishing to me.

This is a nice article. I'm trying to make a map save file format. I'm curious if most developers usually use abstractions over bitflags(safely hiding away the bitwise operators from being typod, etc). My main niggle is I want maximum type safety and compile time checking, ie the compiler preventing me from accessing a bit that isn't being used or mixing things up. My other concern is also backwards compatibility if I want to modify the flags. Saving 2 bits for the version?

I want a kind of tree structure of bitflag values, and I'm trying to think of a good way to do it. For example a Grass /Stone tile, maybe 4 bits for the tile type (0001 = Grass), and then from that point forward, the remaining flags depend on the tile type (Grass having the next 2 bits for the grass colour, stone having 1 bit for whether it's cracked or not, etc), but in a safe and efficient abstraction where I can't accidentally mix them up. I don't want a pirate software monstrosity where I can't keep track of the different combinations.

Whenever my apple wallet connects to my phone, It plays a totally useless animation that feels like it takes forever, and covers the entire screen. In that time, you cant see or do anything on the phone. So annoying, and for no reason. Just give me a little haptic when it connects.

the individual was unable to distinguish a display name from the actual email address

This is wild to me, not just because they're a developer but they even know about SPF/DMARC. Also, the content of the email being them asking to reverify your email sounds suspicious and illogical. I know people make mistakes, but it's just crazy, and shows the importance of companies training employees to not fall for phishing emails.

Which companies are violating copyright on a massive scale? And what impact? (a bigger, badder impact sounds implied by you)

Both autism are ADHD are vastly under-diagnosed especially in women and adults.

How is this known or proven?

I disagree that it's a genocide, but if you're going to link a source showing it is, the United Nations, and/or the wikipedia page on the topic, would be better than a paywalled NYT article.

The cloudflare status page had nothing reported, so I just assumed its some issue elsewhere (and the HN post didn't exist yet), if it wasn't for HN I'd probably be ordering a new router and ripping apart all my network settings and complaining to my ISP.

It's a legitimate distinction, "they were in control" and "they weren't in control". If the pilots are on a collision course with a mountain, but are happily sitting there thinking they're going the other way, there's nothing wrong with the plane, and the pilots are in control of the plane. In contrast to a horizontal stabilizer failure, where the pilots aren't in control, and instead say their goodbyes for the cockpit voice recording.

So, people are being treated differently entirely on the basis of their race - but it's not racist because they're lazily cutting corners in following a regulation? If they actually cared why would they not just blur all faces instead of looking at their race to decide whether or not to do it?

Business don't exist to respect or care about people they exist to generate profit so the idea of a business "respecting" something is not even realistic.

People work at businesses, and those people make decisions that are influenced by their personal feelings. In a free market people will boycott them for doing bad things. Racist businesses being outted, receiving bad press and losing revenue - in this scenario it sounds like the japanese are okay with it. Being respectful is profitable.

When filming in the street, for example, for a street interview, TV typically blurs the faces of Japanese-looking people passing by (except for foreigners). While in the West people have no respect to other people,

Am I missing something or is this just plain racism? There are lots of japanese people who don't look japanese, foreigners who are permanent residents, and japanese-looking people that aren't japanese - how is it respectful to protect just a certain ethnic groups privacy?

I disagree, I've been using linux for 20 years, and know the ins and outs in detail, and it's a easy choice for non-technical users. Just make sure they install the best distro (you know which one...), read the man pages, and know how to get those pesky gpu drivers working, brushing up on their bash skills would help too. Personally I recommend they compile their own kernel with some tweaks.

If you're just eating a burger, you're not personally slaughtering the cow. Secondly, the relationship of humans and dogs is far different than humans and cows, dogs have evolved alongside us as companions, and cows are food.

If you had to choose between a family member dying or a totally random person dying, even though objectively they're both just humans, you're going to kill the random person, because you have feelings and emotions, and they are part of the equation. For the same reason you'd kill the random person, people would kill the cow, and want to save the dog.

Google bulldozes features to be first to market so it can implemented the way they want it implemented

Can you give an example of this?

I think they are referring to secretly regression testing other peoples code (to check if patched exploits become exploitable again).

If you do this with no build step, how can you have cache busting of your component files? or is there an alternative solution that doesn't sacrifice on performance (but also doesn't serve stale files or an inconsistent version between files)?

I don't it's practical or useful to just say "limit the size of entire requests" and just ignore all the real world reasons you'd want to actually validate/check data before putting it in your database. The logic you're using is how we have bugs and security holes. This persons write-up gives specific and detailed information that's genuinely useful.

I just tried this, and google returned a variety of videos (guides for fixing), and various text/website tutorials (home depot, reddit etc), I had to scroll to the absolute bottom to see an ad for a plumber.