HN user
Totally different concept, but this reminds me of the anecdotes my professor would tell us about the possibility of eavesdropping on a monitor (CRT then) based on the light radiation emitted, and not from seeing the actual image itself
How much less of an offense would it be if he took more time to just reword things, even if the same message was kept?
I know this letter was written for a UVA audience but there is almost no actual rhetoric about why he believes the administration to be wrong. I understand the power of losing every title and honor on your own,..but why not put more Ome into drafting a concise and powerful argument?
Isn't it the classic innovators' dilemma? Or I guess it's the opposite...IIRC, the innovators dilemma refers to a leading company that ditches the low end in order to focus on the high end...Apple went after tht niche and did so well that it caused execs...the ones who give IT folk their jobs...to demand iPhone support even if it meant a change in infrastructure
Is there at all a system to try to compare studies or evaluate how apples to apples they are?