HN user

freddref

408 karma

World's simplest email API - https://batsign.me

General inquiries - codykenny@gmail.com

https://xiliary.com

Posts1
Comments143
View on HN

It might be financial beneficial once as an up-front payment, but long term, as others have mentioned, really not good for the project to remove the only feature that gives firefox a defensible way to fill it's niche in the market.

How is Devin different from cursor?

I recently used cursor and it has felt very capable in implementing tasks across files. I get that cursor is an IDE but it's ai functionality feels very agentic.. where do you draw the line?

Two lads set themselves up in the business of selling conkers one year.

Any accidentally dropped conkers were stamped on by any and all in the vicinity.

A conker that survived to the next year was considered "seasoned", although many's the wizened tippex-covered lump of questionable provenance appeared under this explanation.

I am amazed at the number of engineers I've worked with who jump straight into the full implementation. I've done it myself on a few occasions thinking "how hard can this be".

Building the "toy" first is great.

In my experience, about one third of the time the toy is all you need, you can stop there, and what you were going to build fully would be over-engineering. About one third of the time, building the toy tells you you're taking the unworkable approach as you mentioned. And the other third of the time you can extend the toy.

Code Lifespan 3 years ago

Is your code easily deleted? That would be better than - is your code easily modified?

Change is hard, starting again is more fun.

I've always been sheepish about this, but bash is my favorite programming environment! Not really because of any language features as such, more it's terseness and simplicity. Another big draw for me is bash's ubiquity. All of this makes bash the ultimate glue layer. That said, if a bash script goes longer than ten lines long I'll usually rewrite in python.

I so wish I could "kill stupid things before they cause damage", "set direction" and have people follow, but it seems especially difficult for technical people.

We spend all-day every-day talking to our subservient (a compiler) but a human is fuzzy and unreliable which is compounded by team size. Carmack can realize something in an instant but it is amazing how long it can take an entire team.

One thing I've noticed that really does not work is "complaining", if Carmack thinks he is complaining, then magnify that by 10 for others on the team.

Rather than attacking an idea directly, I'm wondering if ignoring the idea may be more effective. This way there's no one to fight and the idea can slip away without any ego or drama, there's no face to lose.

If you really can't help the situation, then leaving is the last resort. Oh well, on to the next thing, very curious to see what Carmack gets into next.