HN user

forum_ghost

91 karma
Posts1
Comments244
View on HN

How do you measure "cheaper than nuclear"? How much is a life of a dead 10 year old cobalt miner worth in accounting terms? Whatever the price of a coffin is in Africa? What about the ecosystem destruction such mining causes, who is going to put the dollar figure on that?

I don't think we even have enough proven mineral reserves to supply sufficient battery storage to supplement the renewable aka unreliable grid, and hydro dams aren't always right nearby to pump the storage. Long haul transmission eats up huge chunks of generated energy too.

I don't get this weird fetish with fields upon fields of solar panels and windmills, vs a relatively very tiny building that produces gigawatts constantly for several decades.

Why is it better to destroy ecosystems, to destroy fields and kill birds? Just to assuage some irrational phobia around the same thing that's literally heating the Earth's crust?

My comment was specifically about "Why bother with nuclear". I'm not getting into discussions about climate.

You may not like it, but the Earth is kept warm enough for life to exist by nuclear reactions deep inside its molten core.

Nuclear fission is literally what sustains your life.

Otherwise, the planet would be too cold, and it would lack tectonic movements, both are crucial for the emergence of complex life.

Please review The Science(tm): https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/nuclear-fi...

FYI: plate tectonics affect the carbon cycle, help regulate the atmosphere, and thus ultimately contribute to keeping our planet's surface at a comfortable not-too-hot and not-too-cold temperature.

Nuclear is good. Windmills are dumb.

Bigger platforms advertise on Google and have all kinds of partnerships.

Some podunk vBulletin? Might as well not exist, as far as Google is concerned. Makes zero difference to their bottom line.

Why bother with nuclear:

1. fields belong to trees, grass, animals, not to some ugly panels that were produced with millions of tons of toxic waste that was then dumped into the ocean.

2. windmills are ugly, kill birds, ruin microclimate.

3. Additional expertise in fission will lead to more capital, talent, and mindshare available to develop fusion further.

How would a spacefaring civilization get off from this rock and survive without nukes?

Colonization of planets cannot happen without them. Renewables is just the Sun, rebadged, nothing "renewable" about it.

That would depend on the facts, and who made what decisions, and who had what control when.

at this point, all of that has been scrubbed for good, and nothing factual will ever come out.

are you open to new information?

1. Nigeria has 30 MILLION people that use it. Most of the usage is for cross-border transactions. 2. transaction rate limitations only apply to the settlement layer. retail does not need to use it, only very large transactions that need high settlement guarantees.

Lightning network has essentially unlimited tps, currently has close to 1 million (!!) live nodes, and even sub-penny transactions are perfectly viable because fees are even tinier or can be even nil.

Live LN stats: https://1ml.com/

If you truly do care about lives of 4 billion people on the planet, you should at least internalize these basic facts, as you are simply repeating misinformation: tps are low, no traction. it is simply not true.

An open and permission-less global monetary network that does not exclude anyone at all, is about as valuable to you as malformed viagra emails?

4 billion people today live under less than ideal circumstances.

Spending a fraction of a percent of global electricity is absolutely worth it. It provides those 4 billion people with access to the financial services that they would otherwise never get.

Nigeria alone has 34+ million users. Just one country.

What, they are all scammers to you?

It’s very disturbing to read comments on an allegedly techie forum that insist the expansion of energy capacity is somehow bad.

What, we will be the first spacefaring, Kardashev Type 2 civilization that is powered solely by windmills?

Why is energy demonized so much?

There will be 100x, 1000x more energy use in the future in the entire economy.

You are worried some tiny fraction of a percent is an issue?

How do you create an “open and censorship resistant system” that blocks only a specific category of people?

First we start with scammers and crooks, then fast forward a little, and suddenly now we are doing civil forfeitures?

Either something is permissionless, or it isn’t.

Yes, the supply is capped by residency spots available.

They reason they became hyper-supportive is because admissions have become insanely brutal, most poor performers have been screened out before they even apply. The marginal benefits of making the program even harder likely amounts to nothing more than hazing.

It’s simply politically untenable to kick out students during the program, given the already artificially constrained supply of newly minted physicians and regional shortages of talent.