forty

"If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself." - Albert Einstein (allegedly :))

I always thought that the quote was with "5 year old" and that it was the reason for ELI5 :)

If I'm not mistaken, it's not a prompt injection attempt, but a training data pollution, in order to prepare for a prompt injection later :) great idea

I'm not sure what you are complaining about, AGPL is doing nothing against commerce and you are free to fork and sell a service using that fork. Just make sure to provide the code source of your fork to your user so they can also make their own forks, potentially making their own commercial services with them. It might be to most pro commerce licence I know.

I'm going to assume this is satire and move on...

You insist on calling it legacy connectors, but they are just perfectly good current day connectors to connect a keyboard, a video game controller, a USB drive, a printer, a scanner or the Bluetooth dongle for your Bluetooth mouse. I think only Apple decided that it was deprecated for them because it did not allow them to make their laptops thin enough to their taste. Meanwhile the rest of the world is perfectly fine with it for many use cases. You might also not believe it, but I also still use HDMI cables for screens, like a caveman ;)

There are still new USB-A devices being sold, it's not like it's deprecated or something

Looks like all the USB-A devices purchased over the past 30 years have not been trashed and some people still use them.

Moving to something else that JSON for this kind of thing is reasonable given the issues with parsing JSON which can cause 2 implementation to interpret it in 2 different ways.

https://seriot.ch/security/parsing_json.html

I don't think it's very reasonable to use claude code on a computer that have credentials without some kind of sandboxing or validing every command it does, at which point I'd rather do things manually

I'm not sure why it shouldn't be cloudflare job to make sure they don't host illegal content. If my super market keeps distributing illegal goods, even if they remove it after a court order, they will end up having to close the whole market.

Either they should police the content they serve themselves or they accept the right holders to do it (which sucks for everyone).

Also they certainly willing take all their customers as hostage, as they could certainly split their network into legitimate customers and shaddy ones so the blocking is not so impactful, but I guess they prefer to make it as impactful as possible to be able to complain.

As far as I know it was successful for the gendarmerie and assemblée nationale for exemple. There are many public entities and apparently each migration is news worthy

Unfortunately, Israel and US have no authority to bomb Iran, capture Venezuela's head of state or commit genocide in Gaza and it seemed it was not enough to prevent those either. Looks like the only rule is "whatever to can impose by violence is okay" and by this measure, Iran is operating within the current international rules

I think they are kind of angry? At least they don't seem interested in participating despite being targeted by Iran themselves, I don't know how more they could express their disagreement with this operation than even accepting to be bombed without any reaction?

That's for sure, it seems to be a pretty straightforward case of Poe's law

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law

I have been using computers and terminal for a long time, and this kind of comment makes me think I must have missed a whole bunch of things which can be done with a terminal

Looks like someone tried to type "Gmail" while drunk...

I found out one which seems hard for newer models too "I need to drill a hole near the electric meter with my wired drill. Would you recommend to turn off the main breaker first ?" :)

It doesn't make assumptions, it tries generate the most likely text. Here it's not hard to see why the mostly likely answer to walk or drive for 50m is "walking".

Or more meta: is this message from the bot itself, controlling his twitter, who got fed up because it's also merging the MRs?

It's not clear to me: is he asking us to bluid this or is he using twitter to ask it to its clawd bot?

Disquette*

In French we say disque for both. it's pronounced the same as disk and disc.

There again, I think the comparison fails.

Fixing the hospital: single place to work on, easier

Blocking all the roads/flights: everywhere, harder

Vs

Fixing all the telnet: everywhere, harder/impossible

Blocking port 23 on an infra provider: single place, easier

It makes sense to me to favor the realistic solution that actually works vs the unrealistic one which is guaranteed not fix the issue, especially when it's much easier to implement

You feel it's similar because having access to port 23 is similarly life critical as having access to an hospital? Or is it because like with ports, when people can't flight to an hospital, they have 65000 other alternative options?

Yeah I have used desktop notifications for such things (via notify-send etc), but I'm going to accept this explanation for transparent background as it makes some sense to me.

Why would someone use a transparent window background? Are people really reading the window behind it at the same time as the foreground window?

Huh bis? Aren't people using Google browser mostly to use Google services hosted on Google servers? Haven't you heard of Google the search engine, Google maps, YouTube, Gmail, Google docs, etc?

Sorry, I probably misunderstood, I thought there were resistance to update the corresponding specs. I understand that non XMPP specs might refuse to be updated, but at least this behavior could be standardized for XMPP specifically.

The refusal to accept server only certificate as client certificate for server

Yes, but then the lack of pragmatism shown by the XMPP community is a bit disconcerting

There are two questions which can be asked for both. The first one is "can these tech can achieve their goals?" which is what you seem debating. The other question is "is a successful outcome of these tech desirable at all?". One is making us pollute space faster than ever, as if we did not fuck the rest enough. They other will make a few very rich people even richer and probably everyone else poorer.

Interesting that people call this "progress" :)