fish55

diffview.nvim also supports side by side view. Lazygit does as well, and opens files in $EDITOR.

If you've already changed your build system to Vite (a breaking change to any app started before Vite), and opted in to all current "future flags" (breaking changes), and multiple forthcoming future flags before 7.0, then you will have no breaking changes. And let's not forget its history, including the previous merge with Remix. The only lib moving even faster is Next. Both are highly focused on PR at the expense of accuracy and good faith.

It's been a long time since I read that. After posting the link, I reread it, and it seems I misinterpreted it somewhere along the way. I thought that it develops an opposition between "matters of fact" and "matters of concern", and that it breaks along the same lines of the discussion here, but it doesn't.

I'm not sure about that. I was very persuaded by this essay, which makes exactly this distinction: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/89-CRITICAL-I...

Very interesting, thanks. I was thinking of logic as the foundation, but now I realize that I was actually thinking of a combination of logic and science.

I haven't thought of ontologies in the plural; I think it resists multiplicity by definition? I expect to be able to chase secondary facts back into their basis in reality.

Those are nothing if not grounded in ontology.

And there is a tendency towards (politically-created) monopoly because only monopolies can concentrate enough wealth to buy elections. Natural or political, the only way to do away with monopolies does not have to do with public/private, but with campaign finance reform.

The revised script enabled many more resonances with social theory. A class relationship in which power is siphoned away from the masses...

"Relative surplus value is produced through the reduction of the value of labor power (variable capital) by means of improvements in the production of goods (effectively the appropriation of productivity gains by the capitalist class)." -Marxist definition

In other words, they will no longer need a wage that also represents the value of eggs, so: -the wage will ultimately be reduced -the portion of their unwaged labor (raising chickens) will increase

People who raise their own chickens can work for less than those who don't.

tldr: A service they could once afford will become unaffordable.

Lots of hocus-pocus in these comments looking for a qualitative measure of class. The only meaningful definition is quantitative. Do we still need to explain why? This fact is the fundamental subtext of all journalism and art since mid 19C.

this is the real story "The median duration of employees in these jobs isn't very long to begin with, about three months." from the article

Service work is scandalously undervalued. I would think that if the technocrats were motivated, they could create tax codes and whatnot to gradually correct this (socialism), and then we would also see an accompanying decrease in: illness, crime, as well as the birth of a real discussion about the purpose of public education, which is now a farce which at best looks for models that will give one group of kids a temporary edge over their neighbors. If we will always need some amount of service work, then we will never need all students to "get ahead (of their peers...)", and this would be so much more tolerable if we would finally begin to value the entire bell curve.

There is an accompanying ideology that regards a proliferation of choices as an emerging consequence of greater multiculturalism/individuality. This is a very convenient analysis for market apologists, and more importantly, it puts off a kind of anxiety-filled absolute reckoning of reason and utility in our decision making. If we were more rational we would likely have to confront an essential emptiness...or maybe that's just how it seems to those of us embedded in the prevailing values.

The working conditions as described are appalling.