But at some point, one needs to launch the thing, despite the complains.
Or: at some point, one decides to launch the thing.
You are reducing the complaints of an engineer as something inevitable and unimportant, as if it happened in every lunch, and in every lunch someone decided to went ahead, because it was what was needed.
If you join a consultancy group, and 2 months later quit with the client roster... is it really OK to poach all their clients to start your own consultancy?
If the clients prefer to leave with the then 2 month-old employee, then the consultancy is doing something very wrong.
Or maybe would be disingenuous to think that public transport would cover for all places a car today can go. The world is not only made of urban sprawl.
The will of the people is expressed in vote and then indirectly applied by the elected officials.
If 100% of Americans decided to make King Charles president, then they will amend the laws allowing him to do so.
In a democracy, the only way forward from a democracy, legally speaking, is through laws. Specifically a new constitution.
And the constitution (at least in Brazil) is very clear on what happens of you try to depose the democracy by force.
You've conveniently excerpted the article to avoid showing that it wasn't two thefts randomly scattered across four decades, but four decades without theft and then two thefts that have just happened.
But the parent said just that in the third paragraph:
does 2 thefts in a week, after 40 years count as a spree?