HN user
Agreed. The issue is that when working 1:1 you get a feel for how many tokens are being burned but the subagent spawn could be 3 or in one cases it spawned 171 to verify something. The latter was unexpected and burned through my token budget.
For coding Opus 4.8 with ultracode is near perfect and doesn't grind away as many tokens. Fable is advertised as 2x the tokens but in my experience it is closer to 5x what I burn with Opus 4.8.
Ok, you got me. It took me a minute.
For coding I'm finding the same thing. It does appear better when I'm doing research. But 4.8 with ultracode is very competent at 99% of tasks I throw at it.
All those terrible republicans against this common sense bill.
I must be unlucky because I'm in that .73% way more than .73% of the time.
The US is still dominant for research spending and high impact scientific publications and medicine. I too would be interested in where they think it would be better. Israel and South Korea are the only two that might provide more opportunities depending on the area of interest.
It's more like once you figure out how to make a really good lamp then producing lots of lamps will be profitable. But the lamps are currently suboptimal so we'll be in the red until that time.
The USA is not a suicide pact. We do need to consider national interests from time to time.
Without examples of the lies it's hard to take his word for it as a disgruntled employee.
Elite human capital isn't normally distributed.
This comment reads as if it were dropped into a generic "genetics of lifespan" thread,. The Dynomight article is already making a much more sophisticated version of some of these same points. The article's central argument is precisely that heritability is a contingent observational statistic, not a Platonic form. This particular article isn't conflating heritability with genetic mechanism at all. It's interrogating a simulation model and its assumptions. The warning about "unqualified instruments" and "retrospective observational data" feels off as this paper isn't a straightforward observational study. it's a parametric simulation fitted to twin registry data.
This comment might be very useful in a Reddit thread full of people saying "50% of lifespan is in your DNA," but it's a bit off-target as a response to this particular article.
And really it's just a few.
That and we can observe how certain policies play out. I used to be a big decriminalize drugs guy but watching it play out in a few states has had me rethink that idea. I haven't done a 180 or anything but it is something I'd be more cautious about implementing.
And yet somehow it works...
I pay cash for a medication because the insurance won't pay for the 90 day supply and it's a hassle to deal with it every month. It's $70 for me to pay for 90 days out of pocket versus paying a $20 deductible each month. I'm only paying $10 extra to avoid the hassle. Worth it.
It appears you're using a Vanguard total market fund. Nothing wrong with that, it's clearly broader than the SP500, but I suspect more folks are familiar with the latter. In that spirit folks might be interested to know it's not much different. If Tesla disappeared tomorrow with would be 2.4% of the SP500.
China's corporate espionage might have surpassed France at the winners podium.
Nuclear advocate here. I'd also note that while natural gas is a reliable power source; the price can be very volatile.
I trade options and natgas is called the widow maker.
South American
My parents in their 70's.
As an aside, I'm not really sure whether equity in the schools is simply being used as a buzzword folks think they need to include in their statements about various topics, or whether people really adhere to what it means and entails. Probably a little from column A and a little from column B.
I work in education and you're probably right that it's not THE thing, but it does enter the conversation. Teachers are supposed to provide what's called differential instruction but the quality and fidelity really depends on the teacher.
My apologies, I haven't finished my coffee yet this morning and overlooked that issue. Give this a try:
Great if it holds up. Unfortunately, they have had some rather large revisions to the initial estimates lately.
One of many sources you can find on this issue: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/21/business/economy/us-jobs-...
Using a lens with a shallow depth of field to create a bokeh effect.
A large part of what makes elite schools elite is the people you meet. That legacy kid whose dad is well connected or is a VC, is just as important as the smart kid that invents the next great thing. These institutions brought together the brains and the money. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.
Forty-nine states recklessly allow florists to sell flowers without a license. Only the good people of Louisiana are safe from dangers of unregulated flower purchases.
Not the OP.
The tl;dr is that Polars is faster and has cleaner syntax than Pandas. That said, there's more information (books, videos, discussion boards) and example code for Pandas. If you've got a small project then Pandas does fine. I use Pandas but it's not my day job. If it was, I'd probably switch to Polars.