The user still needs to provide proof that they own the passkey in order to login. It's not like someone could hack the website, steal the "string" and use it to login.
HN user
fastest963
Software Engineer @ Admiral (previously at Grooveshark)
https://twitter.com/jameshartig https://github.com/jameshartig
james at getadmiral dot com
Rezoning land is extremely difficult and likely requires changes to the Master plan for the city/county. If a citizen is unhappy with a zone nearby do not move there.
If an area is zoned for industrial and someone wants to build a datacenter there without variances I don't see why anyone should be able to say no. Same thing for building condos or single-family homes in areas zoned for those. There's almost always variances though which is why there is even an opportunity to say no.
The project is expected to generate approximately $310 million in property taxes over 30 years, in addition to utility taxes.
This is what zoning is for. If you live near land zoned for industrial or commercial then you can't fight it when someone wants to develop the land. If you don't want to live near something like that you shouldn't have bought/rented next to that zone.
Depends. Is the alternative a loud, obnoxious factory? Or a warehouse with a constant stream of trucks? If you live near land zoned for industrial buildings then something is going to go there eventually.
Datacenters bring millions in tax revenue (I oppose giving them tax breaks, that's a politician issue not an issue inherent to DCs) and are much less of a nuance than factories or warehouses. The increased cost of electricity is a concern but can be helped by an upfront investment, a bond for future grid maintenance, or separate utility infrastructure.
Are the datacenter concerns actually AI fears and they somehow think that stifling datacenter construction will save their jobs from AI? I understand the fear but if there's money to be made, datacenters will get built somewhere, and another municipality will reap the benefits.
Coinbase confirmed on X that the exchange only ran in one AZ for latency reasons: https://x.com/i/status/2052855725857329254
Coinbase claimed multiple AZs were down but the AWS statement was that only a single AZ was affected. Does anyone have more details?
For the last 3 months I've been trying to get support from Google/gRPC/GCS teams to fix an issue with gRPC which results in thousands of connections and constant connection churn. The underlying issue appears to be a constant backend priority rotation with the endpoints for the client to connect to. The gRPC team seems unwilling to address why the gRPC client is opening several hundred connections when I'm not even using the client.
I was told to open a GCP support ticket and after many messages back and forth the ticket was closed because the discussion would continue on GitHub only for the issue to be closed a few weeks later.
I'm not the only one experiencing this issue either as a related issue was just posted in the google-cloud-go repo: https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-go/issues/14538.
Yeah, but this still gives any employee RCE on the GHES server right?
RateRudder: https://raterudder.com
I've been working on a solution to automate solar+battery use to arbitrage the market. I'm on a real-time utility plan but even if you're on TOU it can save you $1+ per day by strategically planning when to use the battery and when to conserve or charge the battery. So far it's limited to a few providers and only FranklinWH batteries but I'm eagerly looking for someone to help me get Powerwall support working and other ESS. It's open-source on GitHub as well.
On Mac binaries need to be signed and notarized and Apple could stop the spread of the malware once it's identified or even detect it before notarizing it.
I wouldn't say it's without pay. It's in the job description when you're hired and the pay should compensate for that. SREs are typically paid very well.
I'm not sure there's a realistic alternative. If you need to generate a key then it has to happen somehow on unsupported platforms. You can check Enabled() if you need to know and intend to do something different but I assume most of the time you run the same function either way you'd just prefer to opt into secret mode if it's available.
It can be more complicated depending on your environment but I'd prefer instead to use a Pub/Sub pattern instead. You can have a generic topic if you want to model it like the generic table but it handles retries, metrics, scaling, long-running, etc all for you. If you are running in the cloud then Pub/Sub is something you don't need to maintain and will scale better than this solution. You also won't need to VACUUM the Pub/Sub solution ;)
That release isn't immutable
Isn't the minimum realistic prefix size you can request /64 so that devices can still do EUI-64?
Yeah, I don't understand how it passed DMARC and why it wasn't rejected immediately by his mail server (Apple Mail?).
What's the payment threshold? I assume you're paying 2.9% and $0.30 (or around there) for the transaction. You charge that to the customer but what if their bill is $0.01, are you really going to make them pay $0.32 for $0.01 of usage? How do you expect SaaS providers to communicate that on their pricing page? If they charge $0.01 per request and the end-user makes 100 requests their bill is actually $1.33 which means the actual per-request charge is $0.0133.
Several years ago Stripe offered more favorable pricing for small transactions but it's my understanding that that pricing is no longer available to new Stripe businesses.
They MITM the real sign-in on NPM. So NPM actually sent them a 2FA but the user entered it on the phishing site. The attacker then relayed that to the real NPM.
Just 64 characters but they do integrate with a password manager and have a 1-click button to add it. The integration was pretty seamless and saved it in 1Password.
If you're in a group and someone is backing up the messages, it only affects your messages in that group. All of your other chats are still secure as long as you're not using the backup frature.
You (and Signal) can't control how the recipient handles your messages if you're not using disappearing. They could be copying and pasting your messages or taking screenshots. I don't see how the backup feature is any different.
Sure but the key is still in a separate location from the backup. Signal can't decrypt the backup and if Signal is hacked someone would still need to get your screenshot to decrypt the backup. Not perfect but far better than an unencrypted backup.
I have 1Password installed and it prompted to save in 1Password. Worked perfectly. It even let me paste from 1Password on the verification screen. It was the most seamless password manager experience I've ever had.
With a big company like Google I'm sure lawyers are the ones preventing an open API and not the developers. The API is a liability for Google. It could infringe on patents or it could have a bug.
Why does the Harbor VM need 32 cores and 64GB of RAM? Especially if it's only serving 32,000 pulls over 2 months.
My employer uses greptile and I'm pretty happy with it. Sometimes it can be a bit overzealous but more often than not it catches real issues and gives the author a chance to reply or fix them before another human reviews the PR.
Yes, we implemented a separate service internally that interfaces with an LLM and so the callers can be agnostic as to what provider or model is being used. Haven't needed to load balance between models though.
Luckily GCP load balancers and Pub/Sub we're generally unaffected, at least for us, which are the 2 products we depend on the most. Messages piled up in Pub/Sub while other GCP products were down but that was it. We did uncover a few spots where we had a GCP product dependency in the critical path that didn't need to be (the actual usage is optional but we don't ignore the error).
In most industries there isn't an expectation that providers are multi-cloud because these multi-region, multi-product outages within a single cloud are rare. Hopefully customers were forgiving in this case and see news headlines validating the extent of the outage.
Woops, I meant R2.