enedil

At some point though, the speed of reading/writing is limiting what you can understand. Think of "not fitting the needed formulas/theorems in cache".

most annoying the cookie law

Also, the least consequential even ignoring often stated fact that cookie banners are malicious compliance. I care much less about cookie banners than about the ads, and for both of I have uBlock origin filters. So, what to be angry about exactly?

To be fair, I don't remember people complaining about cookies. The question is fairly simple, etc. Meanwhile ads? They try to steal the attention. So yeah, lots of friends complain about internet ads, not so many about cookies. I'm EU based.

Because entire point of their work is to find the issues as fast as possible, and most importantly, before others.

Why are you so sure that the effects of social media are reversible?

I think parent commenter meant that what's insane is that js runtime is not treated as an utility which should never be monetized. It's as if GCC developers haven't figured out how to monetize, but they are willing to at some point.

Or also sue in fact or demand refunds.

You can install "Hacker's Keyboard" on Android, it does have ctrl key.

L4 engineer at Google Warsaw (very popular destination across hires in Europe currently) makes ~120k USD TC

It says "Pan-European" everywhere, but would this include Belarus?

Don't forget GoG which is an alternative game store with a strong anti-DRM stance (all the games there are DRM free).

I think "UK citizen" should have been replaced by "person acting from within the UK". This is how it is defined in the context of GDPR - the nationality doesn't matter, what matters is where you are when you are provided services.

O(n lg n) is indeed hard to prove for quicksort, because it is not even true in the general case. Worst case is O(n^2).

Let me play devil's advocate: for some reason, functions such as strcpy in glibc have multiple runtime implementations and are selected by the dynamic linker at load time.

Materialized views in ScyllaDB are (were?) known to be a buggy implementation. In particular, they often depended on the cluster being healthy at the time of propagating the changes.

I think the main issue is that JSON is capable of serializing JavaScript Objects, which are often much more complex than a simple hashmap.

I'm not sure what do you mean. Statement "open source models can just add a clause to the terms of use, restricting how it can be used" is false, because in that case, it won't be open source. Does it mean that the open source needs to comply with the laws? Absolutely, but that might mean that open source models are effectively illegal.

I think the point here is that so that people reading the article don't complain about "they didn't contain GPL code directly" somehow justifies thinking that that was bikeshedding and not a legitimate violation of the license. Of course, it does not matter if the code was modified or not, but that point might not be clear to the readers who don't have enough experience with GPL.

Indeed this is. For some reason, all the implementations that I can recall suffer from some usability problems. I expect that if a solution that is acceptable for Durov is discovered, they will roll it out. Of course, my prediction might be wrong.

I think it is pretty obvious why Durov did not opt for universal E2EE. His main purpose of making Telegram was to make the chat app that is the most usable of all. E2EE comes with a cost on user experience which was for him too high.

Example: Signal can't handle more than one phone logged in, and if for some case you don't open the desktop app for more than 30 days, it logs you out there and you can never get these messages to the desktop.

Uuh, any kind of dev box that requires more RAM than available? I promise you that storing that much data about the runtime can be really memory consumptive.

Probably not Kelvin.

This doesn't matter, if libxml2 loads .so and the library is malicious, you are already potentially compromised, as it is possible to run code on library load.

Oh yeah, I read it as 1%. My apologies.

How is the EV of 1% of change at $1B and 100% chance at $1M the same? The EV is respectively $10M and $1M. I actually think, that if it was the same, they would have different approach towards being a VC.

As a Polish guy, I don't know why wouldn't you trust material from TVP History, the content there is usually pretty accurate. The same with TVP Sport - wouldn't you trust what they publish there?

Edit: this is not TVP History, but the point stands.

It may be that Signal pioneered E2EE chat

Also false. XMPP OTR existed long prior.

But well educated five year olds from good schools would know it.

Even it it was O(1) not amortized, it's not possible to beat the sorting in actual execution time for reasonable inputs (less than 10B elements probably)

Nevertheless, this is still a concern to wider ecosystem, if Python libraries suddenly start to break due to underlying issues. I don't think this can be neglected.