We made a similar move from Next.js to Vite (with Tanstack router): CI build dropped from 12 min to barely 2 min. We won't look back.
HN user
eino
Thanks, uruky sounds quite promising, giving it a try
You can set the Default Mode to Ask in Cursor settings -> Chat
The quote from OP was "The US has provided more funding to Ukraine than the world combined by a large margin". Which is just completely false. Now you're just moving goalposts.
I take your (or the worm's) bank account access was not meant to be in this comment?
Why would you pay that? You’d subscribe to the unlimited plan for 25$/mo.
Then it would be better take the professional plan including 700 searches for 10$/mo.
I haven’t but I will a try! In the last years the only that I found equivalent was cliqz, that unfortunately closed 2 or 3 years ago and which I still regret.
I used DDG which was slightly better; but for a couple of months, I've switched to kagi, and it's been a revelation. It's much better than both, it's google from 15 years ago. Drawback is that unlimited searches needs a subscription (10$/months). But I personally think it worth for the time and focus gains.
That's just not true. I switched from google at least two years ago (first to cliqz now DDG), and haven't looked back ever since. And I run pretty technical queries. When I try google again, it's not better, and many times it's worse.
There is a big discussion here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30450336
Well no, ゆうべ (ユウベ) is right, see for instance https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/%E5%A4%95%E3%81%B9/
It's the 夕 kanji, which reads as either "せき" or "ゆう", it's not the タ katakana.
Like some others have said, I've found Deezer's flow (shuffle algorithm) to give the best results. I've been using it for a few years now, so I have no idea how fast it could learn for a newcomer.
They just added a "moods" choice to flow a few days ago: focus, sport, party... I think there are 6 of them. But they added it only to the mobile app and not the webapp which is the one I use the most, so I can't really say how good they are.
It's not like you are going to switch to Bing
From personal experience, I switched to another tool (DDG) a couple of years ago. When I occasionally try Google, for 95% of common requests I'm appalled by the results: the top is only SEO garbage. For very specific and precise searches (where people are not trying to game the system), Google is still the best, though.
Also: cliqz.com that is surprisingly good for technical queries, and quite good for general searches
I've been using protonmail for the last 3 years, and I've been satisfied with it. For the switch, you don't have to do it at once. I've been migrating services one by one (but I'm quite the procrastinator), and still receive some mail on the gmail account. But I use PM as the primary email for new contacts and new services.
I totally agree with the sentiment. However I'm afraid the day "Ask HN" comes as first results in Google, is the day HN will be flooded with spammers recommending their products (like in amazon reviews).
I feel the force of small sites like HN is precisely to be in the shadow and too small to interest spammers.
That Google doesn't break any anti-trust law is missing the point. The post doesn't say Google is illegal. It says even though legal, there are many issues with one source controlling all access to information.
Every week we have posts about new products, often self-posted. If they're upvoted, it's that people find it interesting. Quite ironic writing the blog is an emotional rant (that I would disagree with, I find it quite argumented), while your whole comment is whining that people upvote things that you don't agree with.
The question implies there is one correct answer.
Do you agree it can be rephrased as "Which answers in this list are the correct answers to this question?", so as to make it more difficult, while keeping the same answer?
You can secede in federalist countries
Maybe in theory. But looking at American civil war, Russian war in Chechenia, and others, in practice it certainly isn't so.
It was the smallest number for which we didn't have an answer. A few months ago it was 33 (https://www.quantamagazine.org/sum-of-three-cubes-problem-so...), and it seems it's now 114 (https://twitter.com/robinhouston/status/1169878224416829442)
what if you rename or redefine sys_nerr in tclunix.h and in files that use this definition?