HN user

eds

150 karma
Posts2
Comments45
View on HN

Yeah, it's a terrible sentence. First they're "we," then they're "Adobe," then they're "we" again, and while you were distracted by all that, behind your back they snuck in "as we are [working]" when they meant "as we do."

Last time I pulled my credit report, the security questions included "Choose which of the following is true: you have an account at XXX Bank / you have a loan in the amount of $YYY at ZZZ Bank / etc."

Yes, some other information was required too, and no, I don't know what good a credit report does you either.

Would you please explain how driving a small car (let's take a Prius as the obvious example) has exactly the same effect on the environment as driving a gas-guzzler? I don't get it.

Set it up so the participating sites can give away rewards to the people who beta test. Free accounts, discounts, whatever. You could organize all that.

Even if only a fraction of reviewed sites do it, you'll have enough people coming through that sites with nothing to give away will get attention too.

That's interesting, I was under the impression that pensions were an agreement between the company's management and the union. But it seems you're saying the company had no say in the matter? I know I've never had a pension anywhere I worked. Please explain.

When I'm hunting through my papers for receipts, I want those things to look like what they are--receipts. The only drawback to the existing MASA receipt that I can see is that it's harder to make your web page look good when you're trying to show it off on your blog later.

Haha. I like it. Looks good to me, though I'm not a lawyer. Only thing I could think of adding would be a sentence that explicitly says something like "you assume all responsibility for your use of the site and any information you get from it."

No. Your article is from 2002 and, at the end, refers to a case then before the Colorado Supreme Court. Here's the outcome (2003):

"After finding a lack of precedent from the Colorado Supreme Court construing individual officer liability under the Wage Claim Act, we certified the following determinative questions...

1. Are officers of a now-bankrupt corporation individually liable for the wages of the corporation's former employees under the Colorado Wage Claim Act? ...

2. If so, are all officers individually liable due to mere status as officers or must the officers have been high ranking or active decision-makers? ...

The Colorado Supreme Court then answered the first reframed question, holding "under Colorado's Wage Claim Act, the officers and agents of a corporation are not jointly and severally liable for payment of employee wages and other compensation the corporation owes to its employees under the employment contract and the Colorado Wage Claim Act." Id. (emphasis added). This response clearly answers the first question certified by this court and moots our second question. We REVERSE the district court's summary judgment order..."

http://ca10.washburnlaw.edu/cases/2003/02/00-1324.htm