edouardb

We are currently working on our managed Postgres offering. Should be available in technical preview in September. Other services like providing object storage are planned too but I don't have any ETA to share for now :)

Glad to hear that! We plan to provide object storage in the future. For now, our recommendation is to rely on a specialized provider for that, i.e. S3, GCS, R2, Wasabi, etc.

Co-Founder of Koyeb [1] here, we provide an alternative that you might want to check.

Didn’t officially launch yet - feedback welcome!

1: http://koyeb.com/

Minio is an awesome object storage solution with great features such as the S3 gateway but from what I know they don’t have a processing layer.

At Koyeb we also have an S3 compatible layer to let users send, process, and store (on any cloud or your own edge Minio) data. As @bdcravens said, its where similarities end, plus Koyeb is entirely managed.

We’re currently working on a deep Git integration where you basically push your updated workflow configuration with the code of functions/docker tag reference.

We have some tooling to develop individual catalog integrations locally and test the integration with object storage works as expected. We plan to publicly release this tooling for all users to be able to test their functions locally before using them on a workflow.

For workflows environment, currently, right now, you have to create one processing Stack for each environment, i.e. dev, staging, and prod. Later on, we want to spawn environements for each Git branch.

The `after` attribute is present to let you implement your processing logic. The steps list contains the processing actions but it is not a sequential execution. The workflow can have multiple processing branch and perform a series of processing on the result of a specific step.

Post updated #6

Scaleway.com also offers baremetal servers at a really attractive price. The CLI is just awesome, it's great to see other cloud providers joining the game.

Totally agree with that !

Everything is fine here, BTW all offers are here: https://www.online.net/en/winter-2017/sales

Try it :) Note that C2S,M,L are BareMetal servers so you get constant and predictable performances all the time.

We design and manufacture our own server hardware so we can optimize our cost. We select each component of our servers to get high quality servers at the best price and remove all unneeded components. The result is that you get a server with the best price-performance ratio.

It's not the same price :)

You mean: Baremetal and VPS provider. :)

It's not supported yet.

Online DC2, Paris, France http://www.iliad-datacenter.fr/datacenters/dc2 (French)

Try it, it's free for the moment :)

No

Yes it's Avoton CPU https://www.scaleway.com/faq/server/#-Why-did-you-go-back-to...

Nice!

What was your issue?

I'm on a 50GB volume :)

  ~# fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=16 --size=4G --readwrite=randread

  test: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=17457: Thu Sep  3 12:39:10 2015
   read : io=0B, bw=115612KB/s, iops=28903, runt= 36279msec
   cpu          : usr=17.12%, sys=67.12%, ctx=35506, majf=0, minf=39
   IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=100.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
      submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
      complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
      issued    : total=r=1048576/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0

  Run status group 0 (all jobs):
    READ: io=4096.0MB, aggrb=115612KB/s, minb=115612KB/s, maxb=115612KB/s, mint=36279msec, maxt=36279msec

  Disk stats (read/write):
   nbd0: ios=55484/53, merge=0/587, ticks=134950/1020, in_queue=135900, util=24.02%

  ~# fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=16  --size=4G --readwrite=randwrite

  test: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=17460: Thu Sep  3 12:43:54 2015
   write: io=0B, bw=15741KB/s, iops=3935, runt=266460msec
   cpu          : usr=3.97%, sys=25.75%, ctx=544104, majf=0, minf=23
   IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=100.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
      submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
      complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
      issued    : total=r=0/w=1048576/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0

  Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   WRITE: io=4096.0MB, aggrb=15740KB/s, minb=15740KB/s, maxb=15740KB/s, mint=266460msec, maxt=266460msec

  Disk stats (read/write):
   nbd0: ios=0/1053524, merge=0/106948, ticks=0/4282740, in_queue=4281210, util=100.00%

  ~# fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=128 --size=4G --readwrite=randwrite

  test: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=17463: Thu Sep  3 12:48:26 2015
   write: io=0B, bw=16400KB/s, iops=4100, runt=255749msec
   cpu          : usr=4.20%, sys=22.28%, ctx=576266, majf=0, minf=23
   IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
      submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
      complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
      issued    : total=r=0/w=1048576/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0

  Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   WRITE: io=4096.0MB, aggrb=16400KB/s, minb=16400KB/s, maxb=16400KB/s, mint=255749msec, maxt=255749msec

  Disk stats (read/write):
   nbd0: ios=0/1047606, merge=0/56, ticks=0/32543280, in_queue=32545150, util=100.00%

  ~# fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=128 --size=4G --readwrite=randread

  test: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=9439: Thu Sep  3 12:48:32 2015
   read : io=0B, bw=28594KB/s, iops=7148, runt=146685msec
   cpu          : usr=8.60%, sys=31.77%, ctx=591701, majf=0, minf=138
   IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
      submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
      complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
      issued    : total=r=1048576/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
      latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=128

  Run status group 0 (all jobs):
    READ: io=4096.0MB, aggrb=28593KB/s, minb=28593KB/s, maxb=28593KB/s, mint=146685msec, maxt=146685msec

  Disk stats (read/write):
   nbd0: ios=1047291/4, merge=0/1, ticks=18660030/50, in_queue=18659150, util=100.00%

There is no RAM sharing, it's a metal server

Omg!

https://twitter.com/imoins/status/560459753152086016 :)

Yes, the C1 server is a 4-core CPU with 2GB of RAM and a 1 Gbit/s network card. Other variation of servers are coming, including x86-based CPUs.

Servers give a constant CPUMark of 12K

You should have a look to the IOPS instead bandwidth

  root@instantcloud:~# fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=16 --size=4G --readwrite=randwrite
  test: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=16
  fio-2.1.11
  Starting 1 process
  Jobs: 1 (f=1): [w(1)] [100.0% done] [0KB/18714KB/0KB /s] [0/4678/0 iops] [eta 00m:00s]

  root@instantcloud:~# fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=16 --size=4G --readwrite=randread
  test: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=16
  fio-2.1.11
  Starting 1 process
  Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)] [100.0% done] [22307KB/0KB/0KB /s] [5576/0/0 iops] [eta 00m:00s]

Try to refresh?