eaf7e281

Really hope to see a Windows result. What if Windows has a latency of 10 ms+. xD

I'm excited to see what happens when there's enough data, will it show the same kind of progress just like GPT does.

What is the benefit compared to a compatibility layer? Is it easier for future maintenance?

It's definitely a huge improvement towards "FOSS Windows."

this one really annoying

Got it! Just let me know if you need anything else later.

damn

When life is controlled by algorithms.

They're trying to win back the people they pushed away by only increasing the weekly limit by 50%. I'm like, "What?"

Won't go back, especially since their new Opus 4.7 is such a disaster.

However, they could use it as a last resort or as a final "gift" before getting arrested or switching identities.

They might be considered "trustworthy" right now to get companies to pay them money, but no one will know what will happen in a few years when this strategy won't work anymore.

Anyway, I hope this doesn't come at all, or as late as possible.

leak state (e.g. UUIDv7)

But according to PostgreSQL, UUIDv7 provides better performance in the database, so is this essentially a trade off between security and speed?

Is now a good time to get a upgrade for cpu and motherboard?

Interesting. I'm currently conducting an experiment where I'm writing the blog without using any grammar checking tools. I'm wondering how long it will take for me to become "famous" in the AI model.

Is now the best and easiest time to leave something "forever"? Even after many generations of models, a model may still trigger a set of "memories" that know you and what you wrote.

Exciting and concerning.

Same. They do become famous, but not in a wholly positive way.

I'm impressed that such a serious problem popped up out of nowhere.

In my opinion, this mostly affects countries that are still using outdated systems, especially critical systems.

This gives bad actors a direct route to the root. Having an easily accessible root is not funny.

I think it's time to visit an Apple Store and try out the Apple ecosystem. I haven't used an Apple device in a long time.

It's sad that the suggestions are no longer accurate. We live in a fast paced world where something new happens every day.

That's fair. We do have some fairly large monitor, but yeah, we still need a TV for 75 inches or larger.

Are you looking for a monitor? xD

Note that some companies, like Amazon, purchased and ran the Claude on their own hardware. They didn't change the model parameters during the Claude Opus 4.6 karma.

If Anthropic continues to getting worse, try Amazon Kiro and other companies that run Claude on their own hardware.

It might be expensive and have a worse experience compared to Claude's code, but at least the model itself is the "original flavor."

These days, it's hard to ask for much.

I'm not sure where this heat comes from, but what constitutes a "good" forum in your opinion? I would love to check it out.

If your code is open source, your security team can scan it, your contributors can scan it, and independent researchers can scan it too.

Literally! If everyone can access the same system as Claude's Mythos, one solution is to have more people trying to identify your issue before the hackers have the chance to do it.

I still don't understand. Who gave ICE such power, and who is ordering them to do all this? To me, ICE's actions are similar to those of a private army.

American companies give data to the U.S.

Chinese companies give data to China.

I don't trust either of them, but if I had to choose, I would use Chinese products in the U.S. and vice versa.

i mean, openai does same, even worse, they change the model, like gpt 5.4 to -mini

anthropic for now, at least just seems to change quantization of the model

A happy map that makes me sad.

I think they changed the quantification to save computer power for their new model. This might be why the benchmark scores look good, but the real world performance is much worse. I'm wondering if they're testing the model internally and didn't find anything wrong with the new parameter.

I canceled my subscription and switched to a codex, but it's not as good. I'm tired of Anthropic changing things all the time. I use Claude because it doesn't redirect you to a different model like OpenAI does. But now it seems like both companies are doing the same thing in different way.

again?

freedom is not coming

It's hard to say. Maybe it has to do with the way Claude responds or the lack of "thinking" compared to other models. I personally love Claude and it's my only subscription right now, but it just feels weird compared to the others as a personal assistant.

These two basically do what you want, let Claude be the manager and Codex/Gemini be the worker. Many say that Coder-Codex-Gemini is easier to understand than CCG-Workflow, which has too many commands to start with.

https://github.com/FredericMN/Coder-Codex-Gemini https://github.com/fengshao1227/ccg-workflow

This one also seems promising, but I haven't tried it yet.

https://github.com/bfly123/claude_code_bridge

All of them are made by Chinese dev. I know some people are hesitant when they see Chinese products, so I'll address that first. But I have tried all of them, and they have all been great.

I kinda agree. Their model just doesn't feel "daily" enough. I would use it for any "agentic" tasks and for using tools, but definitely not for day to day questions.

From the press release at least it sounds more expensive than Opus 4.5 (more tokens per request and fees for going over 200k context).

That's a feature. You could also not use the extra context, and the price would be the same.