duringmath

1. You'd think he would want to study it up close.

2. If anything it's "fascism lite" and it's only for 4 years.

3. I'm not sure that forcing some belt tightening on a bloated academia is the worst thing in the world.

Who made you the arbiter of what can be posted here?

"no more anonymity"

Fighting perceived fascism with actual fascism.

Clueless.

The sharks are circling and by "sharks" I mean the same people who lobby the government for link taxes and publish puff pieces on politicians who go after their business rivals.

Thought the same happened to me but turned out I just logged in with the wrong account. The codes are there try again.

It's no different than that and it's not deceptive least of which because it happens inside the Google search app.

Half the discussions on these stories are comments from people who can't read reacting to bad faith reporting.

How is that harming anybody?

Ideally the feds would stay out of it and let the market do its thing.

We can hope, his DOJ might amend their demands or the judges he appoints will overturn it on appeal if needed.

Microsoft doesn't want Google to control the codebase Edge is based on and doesn't want anyone to counter the MSFT + OpenAI partnership, and the DOJ is trying to hand them their wishes. Hopefully the judge rejects this overreach and rules on lawsuit scope.

uBlock origin lite.

The former Microsoft lawyer leading this prosecution is doing Microsoft's bidding.

Old timey living or machine repair: https://www.youtube.com/live/33E_-Dfn4Io

It is useful, thanks.

At least wait till the new administration is in place before passing this damaging crap.

Looks like he was hacked according his Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/njwildberger

Least you expect from workers is to show up for work.

If it passes it will be challenged in the courts as major parts of it run afoul of the first amendment.

If anyone still takes this guy seriously it's time to reconsider.

It's unsurprising that the NYT is publishing this as they long held the attitude that the first amendment only applies to them and no one else.

Policy based on pseudoscience

Evidently

Whose life is being bettered by that thing existing other than those with direct investing interest and Nvidia stockholders of course

The collective name for what's trending right now

Nobody gives a crap about chatgpt it's not trending on twitter or nothin hopefully this fad will die out soon

More consequential queries probably have better safeguards, this hullabaloo is about long tail nonsense that doesn't matter, they're kinks to be ironed out.

Despite some evidence to the contrary I believe most people aren't that stupid and the "average person" isn't actually typing in these queries, these are marginal cases played out for meme value.

It's not even hallucinating it's just correctly summarizing the wrong thing.

Also we're only talking about a handful of examples out of billions of queries, that doesn't stop the usual media hyperventilating though.

It's just missing the wow factor, they can still turn it around if the rumors about the new pixie assistant are true but so far yesterday's preemptive OpenAI event seems like it was unnecessary.

Underwhelming so far, everything is disjointed and is months away from being available via labs.