dooglius

You have it backwards. Only people not working for Anthropic do not use AI tools.

He worked for Anthropic, so such a claim would be very unconvincing

It's going to be a much more granular detail than all of crime. If your job is to investigate counterfeited 27B-6 forms, you are going to be threatened by that form moving to being filed digitally with cryptographic signatures.

"pseud" is it's own atom here, see definition 2 in https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pseud

It's not trying to say "something like an apocalypse" it's saying "an apocalypse of pseuds"

Why would it?

Hence GP's advice,

Just squash everything before merging and call it a day.

It is not necessarily the case that the instruction needs be taken literally

I wonder if in each case they had parallel sessions, one trying to prove, one trying to find a counterexample

It looks like it was only added to that page under the solved section _after_ an LLM solved it

Is this the first LLM-solved problem famous enough to have been on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_m...

What does "technically legal" mean here, what authority is that coming from?

Did the promo process exist at YouTube's creation?

Do you dispute his claims? And what about his argument that the NSA is doing the same thing?

If you judge things based on their formatting, that's on you

Kagi downranks ads/trackers, which I would think correlate

Presumably GP means from the binary form

Your link does not support, and in fact refutes, your claim

I can't find it now, but I distinctly remember dang talking about his moderation philosophy being based on what he's read about the activation of the parasympathetic nervous system

I don't think Assange was overly concerned with privacy, transparency was more his wheelhouse.

I'm skeptical of your second claim; being able to find such places ex nihilo would seem to require precisely the skills nerds lack

If you were to implement your own realloc for the purpose of this data structure, you could do that. However, a generic realloc implementation needs to know how many bytes to copy, and generally that means storing the capacity just in front of the allocated region. I don't think there is another feasible way. On e.g. glibc, you can use `malloc_usable_size` to extract this information (modulo certain caveats).

Strictly speaking, the capacity is still stored internally to the allocation (it needs to be, in order to implement realloc)

You're right, it's less uncommon than I recalled, and thanks for the source. But I don't think that 35/42 is suspicious/bizarre, and it does look like the 5x7 scores make up the bulk of the 35s.

This is not bizarre, it's a reflection of how the IMO is scored: 6 questions with scores from 0-7 but partial credit is rare. It's really a score of 5/6.

Fork isn't necessary for this, you could just exec directly?

The point is that the OOM killer shouldn't exist and arguing about how to tweak it is addressing the wrong problem

Often the frontpage will include a new submission with few votes at the top, I recall others in other threads speculating that this is an intentional way (rather than an edge case in the ranking algo) of getting new posts evaluated without people having to visit /newest

I am missing some context here what was wrong with the original description?

Since no one is being quantitative, here's a medical source:

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/water-intoxic...

In some people, water intoxication symptoms can develop after drinking about a gallon (3 to 4 liters) of water over an hour or two.

More than 32 ounces (about a liter) of water per hour is probably too much.

The preceding comment indicates that the intent is to support other compilers. I think a better approach is to define __glibc_attribute__ based on compiler support and to stick to that within glibc since there's no reason to think that another compiler's attributes have the same semantics as GNU C's.