HN user

dontscale

84 karma
Posts6
Comments53
View on HN

From what I remember, you can change in and out of phone numbers like with Google voice - and there are a ton of them. I don't know if that matters for spammy calls - I don't know anything about that domain.

Twilio allows you to automate calls programmatically, and what a lot of the callers do is wait for you to say hello - they're robo dialers. I wonder how much Twilio has influenced that (unknowingly or deliberately)

In that case, you'd really enjoy Charlie Munger's parable about the Shoebutton Prince.

The story goes that one of Charlie's distant relatives had cornered some part of the 1920's shoebutton market. Back then, shoebuttons were smallish ornaments you put on your shoes.

The success entitled the prince to pontificate on any and all things in unlimited fashion--especially those outside the realm of shoebuttons.

I always suspected the cost was a function of the profits of the firms using them.

I think it is a smart move to force bundle the hardware and form the users' keystroke habits over a career. I imagine the switching costs are extreme.

I'm not a trader. I'm actually a programmer and just curious about a lot of things. One day, I contacted Thomson Reuters and asked to try their competing system, I think it was Elektron. It is a pure software system that I got bored with after a few days of exploring.

I think the debate about Colleges vs. Bootcamps is an apples to oranges comparison

Algorithms are commoditized into libraries. Web design has been commoditized with templates.

Open-ended programming is still more complicated, but putting apps on the web today is easier than static HTML just 5 years ago. Parts of programming will continue being commoditized.

So if it's easy to create something and put it out there, the great and all-important challenge that faces developers today is making it matter.

Copying and pasting from SO is perfectly acceptable as long as you know what the code is doing.

When I paste code, I include a comment with the link back to SO. I see it as the standard way of declaring a precedent in programming, where upvotes signal strength.

Ideas don't have to be original to succeed. Not at all. Having an original idea doesn't even give you a leg up. It's all about execution and having an idea that is at least desirable.

That's what Alex is trying to do. He's trying to find that mix.

There's an excellent book (you're probably aware of) called The Outsiders. It compares the results of operations focused CEO's like Welch to capital allocators like Buffett, Singleton, and Malone. The thesis is that overtime, the good cap allocators just blow everyone else out of the water.

http://www.amazon.com/Outsiders-Unconventional-Radically-Rat...

“An outstanding book about CEOs who excelled at capital allocation.” — Warren Buffett

It's wise to work with accountants, but it's not enough. There are a lot of characters in business, and in order to know when they're full of shit (because sometimes they don't even know), you need to know how to count beans by the rules.

For example, a public company might report itself as profitable for some period based on operating earnings alone. But, you read their annual report and see they took a loss after tax with some extraordinary items. If you don't know what that means, then you don't know what it means--It really means they didn't make any money for the period, but they're going around talking about it like they did. I should mention that's all elementary stuff--there exists a whole field called "Forensic Accounting" where accountants work to spot fraud in financial reporting.

And small business owners can get mixed up too. They talk about their big revenues but don't mention they have a lousy 5% net margin. It can extend beyond trying to bullshit you--they can get into the habit of bullshitting themselves thinking they're ballers.

Accounting is the language of business. If you go into business, you should either know it or be willing to learn. It's not good enough to have someone specialize in it for you unless you want to be handed your ass when it comes to anything regarding business valuation--which concerns more than raising capital and m&a. For a business with resources, capital allocation is perhaps the most important concern and accounting is the toolset you work with.

Excellent work and general information. Templates are eating the world. I saw a post on HN the other day about no design jobs--the author got it wrong in his reasoning. Design jobs are shrinking because of templates. It's not economical for me to pay 5 or 6 figures for an original design, when I can have a good enough one to for 60 bucks.

I didn't read the article that way, and it resonated with my sentiments. I tried using docker a while ago, and I never grokked the shipping container analogy -- why it's so much better than some VM's and deployment scripts. It's like it's some complicated layer over that.

I think in the end Solomon Hykes is a talented marketeer, but the great majority of teams/companies are satisfied enough with virtual machines seems to be how it's going to pan out.

The tone of the article is objective, but surely Coindesk has an interest in Bitcoin Classic. I read it as nothing more than propaganda.

I don't have a side one way or another, and I don't own bitcoin. But, it's ridiculous to see these bitcoin 'companies' taking such desperate measures. Given the nature of all the characters I've seen come out of the woodwork thus far, it is not surprising.