HN user

diab0lic

1,509 karma
Posts18
Comments334
View on HN
mantisrx.io 6y ago

Show HN: Netflix Open Sources Mantis an Operational Stream Processing Platform

diab0lic
4pts1
medium.com 6y ago

Open Sourcing Mantis

diab0lic
10pts1
medium.com 6y ago

Inca – Message Tracing and Loss Detection for Streaming Data Netflix

diab0lic
2pts0
medium.com 8y ago

Lessons Operating a Serverless-Like Platform at Netflix, Part 2

diab0lic
178pts33
medium.com 8y ago

Scaling Event Sourcing for Netflix Downloads, Episode 2

diab0lic
3pts0
medium.com 8y ago

Scaling Event Sourcing for Netflix Downloads, Episode 1

diab0lic
2pts0
variety.com 8y ago

How Netflix Hacks: Behind the Scenes at the Streaming Giant’s Hack Day

diab0lic
3pts0
media.netflix.com 10y ago

How Netflix Works with ISPs to Deliver a Great Viewing Experience

diab0lic
2pts0
www.forbes.com 10y ago

Hundreds of Spotify Premium Accounts Exposed Online

diab0lic
6pts0
techblog.netflix.com 10y ago

Netflix Tech Blog: Distributed Time Travel for Feature Generation

diab0lic
15pts0
alexanderetz.com 10y ago

How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps

diab0lic
4pts0
techblog.netflix.com 10y ago

Netflix Tech Blog: Creating Your Own EC2 Spot Market – Part 2

diab0lic
3pts0
techblog.netflix.com 11y ago

Outlier Detection at Netflix

diab0lic
274pts62
news.ycombinator.com 12y ago

Ask HN: Workflow for Scientific Computing in the Cloud?

diab0lic
9pts1
codyrioux.github.io 13y ago

Approximate Policy Iterajion - A Clojure reinforcement learner.

diab0lic
1pts0
codyrioux.github.com 14y ago

A Collection of Exercises for Learning Erlang (Or Any Other Language)

diab0lic
61pts8
codyrioux.github.com 14y ago

Erlang TDD - String Calculator Kata

diab0lic
1pts0
codyrioux.github.com 14y ago

Setting up VIM for Erlang TDD

diab0lic
2pts0
Nano Banana 2 Lite 22 days ago

I can’t tell through text if you’re being sarcastic or not. So I’ll add some context for fun. Ran into this a few weeks ago apartment shopping with a friend. AI images of multiple apartments had:

- Relocated the sink from the back counter to the kitchen island.

- Added outlets that didn’t exist.

- Displayed furniture layouts that were not possible in the actual space. That couch looks great in that spot, except when you explore further you realize it’s sitting right up against the master bedroom’s door.

To that last point, no stager would lay it out that way because anyone viewing the apartment would take them to task for you know… having to drag a couch out of the way to open their bedroom door. Staging layouts have always been more pretty than practical but AI staging regularly puts functionally DOA layouts on display.

As far as I’m concerned it’s disingenuous at best, and deception realistically. The process is broken while this slop is in there.

I’m not sure why I used inflation instead of the risk free rate. I guess I’m rusty!

It has earned ever so slightly more than the risk free rate since 2000. On an absolute basis it is a terrible investment. On a relative basis it is also a terrible investment. On a risk adjusted basis? Abysmal.

I completely agree from a logical perspective. However if the plane blew up and it came out that some passengers had posted online that there was a “bomb” blue tooth device and they didn’t turn around… the court of public opinion would be pretty harsh. This was more or less their only choice from a liability perspective.

I think the metaphor is pretty extensible to handle the things you point out.

you could do everything right and still fail

Sometimes even a high probability draw doesn't get there on the river.

while someone else (like a nepo hire) can do everything wrong and still succeed

Some people always start with pairs, Axs, or suited connectors.

While the difference between the two may still be wide, it is a lot more narrow than it was a year ago. Some people find this concerning.

Ironically it may only be able to do this because it has been trained on Hickey’s creation. This was one of his criticisms.

The comment you’re replying to suggests “lived experience” is too broad, not too narrow. The issue isn’t that it fails to include your example. It fails to exclude other things. Part of my lived experience today was seeing a manatee. It is unlikely this will be passed on.

I’m similar to you. I recently went as far as to buy a pdf for an out of print book and then paid to have it printed and bound.

I suppose a remarkable would be another route but… they are pricey.

The causality might be backwards there. Blu ray and other disk players are likely becoming scarce because people are using them less rather than people using them less because the devices are scarce.

What happened to Netflix DVD by mail was that Redbox ate its lunch, which ultimately was also a failing business model.

Ah! I think I missed your point because I read your comment through the lens of the root comment. My apologies!

We’re actually largely in agreement, especially about content creators deserving compensation and the fact that distribution is vacuuming up most of it.

The market decided a long time ago that movies, songs, books, photographs etc were, in fact, worth nothing. That's the effect of digital media. It's completely incompatible with the free market.

This is such a willfully ignorant take, it’s wild. Anyone who has a cursory understanding of game theory can see that if this were true a simple recursion would occur:

1. Everyone would pirate movies/tv/books. 2. There would be $0 in producing media. 3. Significantly less media would be produced. Anything capital intensive would be gone. 4. Demand for anything that could be produced would skyrocket. Imagine putting together a blockbuster film when the world hasn’t seen one in a century. 5. People would pay money for the product of 4.

Just because we can get something for $0 doesn’t make it worth $0. I could enslave my neighbors and make them work for me, that doesn’t make human labor worth $0.

Sure you can cherry pick an example that would be difficult for me to monetize.

However I can think of plenty I’d do with the model weights for ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini. Can’t you?

I can go on with hundreds of examples. The Waymo source and models, as another example. Enumerating everything would detract from the message so I’ll stop here.

Interesting! I imagine this website is also full of software developers, startup founders, VCs and others who earn a living in software. How do you reconcile all of that work actually being worth $0 with the fact that we are earning a living?

It is my opinion that, as with anything that can be copied infinitely for free, his (and my) personal information is worth $0.

I realize I’m responding to an account created four minutes ago but… the output of nearly all work done on a computer meets this criteria. Is all work done on a computer worth $0 in your view?

I’d definitely use something like this too, but don’t have the luxury of telling my end users to.

They’re very nontechnical.

How is the Windows support in Ratatui? I recently developed something with a different library (also crossterm based) only to discover it did not work very well for my windows users and ended up having to build a GUI with Iced.

There’s a very real chance I just missed some initialization code that Ratatui might do out of the box that the other library was not.

Edit: Issues experienced by windows users were no colors, terminal flashing on every keypress, all keypresses registered as double.

Edit2: This miniature rant inspired me to go back to the commit and submit a patch to eliminate the event reporting on KeyUp and enable terminal colors.

When people buy a car they sometimes get a loan from the auto manufacturer’s financial services arm. What they don’t usually get are warrants struck at a penny for 10% of the manufacturer.

You sound like you know what you’re talking about. I only think I know what I’m talking about. Help me understand: What am I missing in the OpenAI / AMD deal that makes it non circular?