HN user

deltasquared

88 karma
Posts3
Comments69
View on HN

I do have a bit of physics in my background. I read about Grassmann recently in a game programming book. Foundations of game engine development Volume 1 By Eric Lengyel ends with a nice explanation of Grassmann algebra.

The road to reality by Roger Penrose also has a treatment of Grassmann algebra in physics context.

I agree the library is likely a reference to the mathematician.

Introducing Swift 12 years ago

It does look a bit like Dylan. I wonder if it has more than a passing resemblance. Also I wonder if they are doing SBCL real time compelling.

Well if you want to start with the previous product, the inPulse, they have an SDK here: http://getinpulse.com/pulsesdk/

They have a simulator and some nice code samples. It is a fun C api and simulator. I am not sure when they will release the SDK for the Pebble.

Well if anyone wants an emacs mode for this: (require 'generic-x) ;; we need this

(define-generic-mode 'critic-mode nil nil '(("{--.--}" . 'font-lock-warning-face) ("{~~.~~}" . 'font-lock-constant-face) ("{{.}}" . 'font-lock-keyword-face) ("{>>.<<}" . 'font-lock-function-name-face) ("{\+\+.*\+\+}" . 'font-lock-type-face) ) nil nil "A mode for foo files" )

[dead] 13 years ago

It is true that 2 multiplied by it's self 57,885,161 times is not prime. However, if you subtract 1 from that the result is prime.

I do not think apt-get means what you think it means.

Chocolatey seems to implement a subset of the functions that apt-get is useful for.

On Windows if I want to look for system updates, I use Windows update. On Debian I use apt-get.

On Windows if I want a library to use on a project, I use NuGet. On Debian I use apt-get.

On Windows if I want to install a bunch of free applications, I probably will use ninite, but chocolaty looks like a nice replacement for this. On Debian I use apt-get.

That said chocolatey seems like a nice tool for windows.

Something sounds off here.

At face value the article is saying. If most people are "ambiverts" and ambiverts make the best sales people, and sales people are the best leaders, why are there not more leaders? Why is it that most people are not in charge.

Finding out that there is no correlation between extroversion and sales performance is interesting and all but I think it would be better to find a new scale to use, one with positive correlation for what you are looking for.

Pointing out that people's scores for extroversion fall along a normal distribution, and that people's sales preform aces fall along a normal distribution does not really say much.

Typically, a low correlation score means your model is wrong, not that you need to fix your model by choosing a different locus.

I don't understand, not the critics, not the project.

Why insult something that someone obviously put a lot of care into?

The code is nicely formatted and clear. I can see how it works. Props to harthur for making something easy to read and then sharing it on Github. Both readable code and sharing should be encouraged.

I don't really get why someone would want to implement text processing utilities in node.js. It seems to be a bit heavy on the overhead.

Might someone re-implement harthur's user interface (which a bunch of people seem to like) in c, and submit it to the GNU Coreutils project?