defensem3ch

no stevia? i avoid all the other ones

annas-archive.org

no, "Trump's" And "Project 2025" are the modifiers for "ghostwriters", it is not referring to "Trump's project 2025" but rather "Trump's ghostwriters".

what was the source of fructose used in the study? it doesn't say

from an article cited in another comment: "The mere presence of objects this size is potentially disruptive to the body, because even if they are chemically inert, they are small enough to get into and disrupt cells, rather like sand in an engine."

inert to what? your body has to deal with processing all kinds of toxic crap in our environment especially when you ingest it or breathe it in. the amount of people in denial or just now realizing plastic is toxic to humans and animals is mind-boggling. phthalates (in almost all plastics) and BPA (not just BPA but all bisphenols) have been known for years to be endocrine disrupting. the news about plastic and health effects is only going to get worse.

yes, i use firefox too and i love it. however i recently learned vivaldi has tab tiling and it's WAY better for me to use at work because i can see multiple tabs at once. wish firefox could implement this feature too

surprised to see a lack of support for vivaldi. i am a Firefox user and i love it, but vivaldi is also pretty good

vivaldi

completely agree with this and your previous comment

renoise very much takes influence from modern daws, supports vst plugins and its own native effects and uses high quality samples. it's also full-fledged with tons of features, it's like the ableton live of trackers. bintracker is much more barebones and is still in pre-alpha, and it is primarily aimed to produce chiptune faithful to hardware.

wait until they find out about trans fats!

you must be trying to make people sick on purpose!

is it really news that all plastics are toxic? this has been well known for decades. sorry if some of us are just finding this out now.

the dosing was 60,000 IU per month? that's only 2000 IU per day - most vitamin D dosing for effective results i've seen needs to be 10,000 IU per day, implying that they are drastically under-dosing the participants. and i agree with the other commenters who say vitamin K is necessary for proper absorption, and also that vitamin D from sunlight is more effective. so imho more studies should be done with a 10,000 IU daily dose.

it's cheap and easy to build a DIY infrared heat lamp sauna for detox so you can sweat out the bisphenols and phthalates!

they didn't equate protein and the data was self-reported, so take this with a grain of salt.

the missing piece is all the toxins accumulating and causing disease. most doctors have absolutely zero idea what is going on

definitely not. our environment is so polluted that chronic illness is running rampant and the doctors have zero clue what is going on

<!-- he's not actually dead, now is he? -->

I tried using this on my PC but it instantly brought up a dialog when trying to use Youtube (even SmartTubeNext on my nVIDIA Shield) asking me to confirm I'm not a robot. It persisted for several hours until after I stopped using FreeTube. Any workarounds for this issue?

oh my god EOL display is customizable now? oh hell yeah!

all the more reason to compile it oneself. it was the only way i could get ffmpeg encoding to work properly.

no, it doesn't, because astigmatism is caused by wearing the glasses in the first place. read the PDF linked in the article.

yes, it's in the PDF linked in the article, from 2014.

this article sucks. because of widespread issues like hypothyroidism that aren't routinely screened for (in some cases yes but i don't think this is largely the case), there are serious endocrine and metabolic disruptions, so for the author to brush that off in an article that is clearly designed for people who are struggling to lose weight, it's just way off base. there should at least be footnotes for people to have their T3, T4, and TSH checked if they are struggling to lose weight at a caloric deficit.

you can substitute spherical correction for astigmatism correction. the spherical equivalent is the normal spherical value plus 50% of the cylinder. so for -3.00 sphere -1.00 cylinder 100 axis, the spherical equivalent would be -3.50 sphere (blank cylinder, blank axis).

probably not a good idea because it would introduce more problems related to convergence and accommodation, better to just let the eyes work naturally and keep better habits.

so they aborted the original solution???

There's also Goto80's Files in Space https://www.goto80.com/goto80-files-in-space-mcmp3-data-airl...