HN user
Proof? Or just what is convenient for you to believe?
If anything, quite the opposite. Think about this logically - why the need for expensive surveillance if your chief goal was to annihilate a population?
I could see Aviato moving into this space...
I think he was implying that is where you initially store money while accumulating that first $100K (that will be later used for investing purposes).
What is your source for this new evidence? There is overwhelming evidence that is quite the contrary to what you are saying at the time it happened (which is why they dropped the bomb) and even now in retrospect.
By most approximations, there were about 200,000 causalities from the bombs and their aftermath.
That said, had the bombs not been dropped, estimates ran into the millions for Allied casualties and tens of millions for Japanese (civilian + soldiers) casualties.
Ultimately it boils down to an issue of numbers (achieved by expediency).
Had that exact question given to me before, but it was in the form of a closed book "pre-screening" written test.
I simply put down my pen, walked out of the room and told the recruiter if this company was hiring based on these type of questions I would be a terrible fit :)
More importantly though, what's his stance on gay marriage and the Iraq war?