davidcoallier

Apparently Pivotal, Pluralsight and Zuora are also being sued by the same law firm (http://www.howardsmithlaw.com/index.html)

Seems to be a yearly cyclical thing with resume.github.com. I don't know why but as the author, I find it amusing :-)

I couldn't agree more. The content has been relevant from day one and it's been looking even better ever since. I've passed it in a few lectures already and people really love it already :-)

There was no bug tracker for nginx apart from the mailing lists up until 8 days ago :-) That's a pretty good and important addition for the project to engage with the community in my opinion.

Its' fixed :)

Here's a little video to show how it works :) http://www.screenr.com/aJ3

In this case Node.js acts as the webserver as Nginx or Apache would.

PHPJS emulates PHP but can't run PHP scripts :)

Congrats Travis! Can't wait to see what comes out of it.

I think it'll be very interesting to see people distributing and replicating CouchApps. This could allow us to potentially skip completely the AppStore and have our own CouchAppStore.

Also made it avail for swingers and polygamists :-))

http://html5valentine.com/?Joana,John,Dirty%20mike%20and%20t...

Ok everyone, I've added a basic listing of member organisations but the API seems to be a tad erratic and sometimes doesn't load and some other times does.

Please let me know if something is completely wrong and so I'll revert it.

Very good point, I think the footer got lost in some git stash. I've re-added it now.

Yep it's in the list of future features if the GH-API allows it :-)

I would assume Github has a cache, hard-refresh and it should be there now.

Good catch :) Fixed and pushed.

Hah good point :-) Should be fixed now, I just pushed to the repo.

Not yet, I'm planning on adding a few things like (see the note on http://resume.github.com) and more.

Feel free to fork and modify! :) I'd be happy to include any decent contribution that makes better resumes.

This is fairly interesting, in the Jan-Feb 2011 edition of "American Scientist" [2] (The magazine) there's an article entitled "A troubled tradition" that outlines a few issues in academia with reviewing papers.

Peer reviewers traditionally have 5 main rules to follow when reviewing papers and one of them is "Fairness" which essentially states: "Avoid biases based on gender, institution affiliation, nationality, and career status."

Interesting to finally have proof that this doesn't only apply to academia but also to "real-life" engineering and that people discriminate no matter what.

Considering that the definition of engineering is: "The discipline dealing with the art or science of applying scientific knowledge to practical problems" — I can't even imagine why one wouldn't have the right to do "engineering" studies.

I digress, my point is made and I'm sad to still see such reaction to well put studies—Assuming it was well put [1]

[1] David M. Cox — PhD: http://bit.ly/hyf5Lj The aforementioned assumption is made based on the academic knowledge of Dr. Cox and that he would know how to make a study and make an elaborated point explained in details.

[2] American Scientist — Volume 99 — Number 1 — January-February 2011

There I've added it for you. It's nothing elegant but should validate most entries, other bogus entries are filtered and sent straight to /dev/null ;)