davidcbc

Mark Zuckerberg's salary is only $1 a year! He must be homeless given bay area housing prices!

How much of a burden could this really be?

You know how Google deprecating stuff externally is a (deserved) meme? Things get deprecated internally even more frequently and someone has to migrate to the new thing. It's a huge pain in the ass to keep up with for teams that are fully funded. If something doesn't have a team dedicated to it eventually someone will decide it's no longer worth that burden and shut it down instead.

So, you want to keep the status quo where the people who are correctly compensated for their role are the ones willing to front-run their own citizens? (And also spending their time front-running instead of their elected job?

No, those are actually entirely different words than what I have said.

$174k is not an accurate representation of the wealth accumulated from being a member of congress.

This is like the CEOs who "only get paid $1"

Salary is not where congresspeople make their money and if you don't think that being in congress is a good way to make lots of money right now I don't know what to tell you

That sure would be different than now

You think the median citizen has 2 years of guaranteed job security and a cushy consulting job lined up if it doesn't pan out after that?

Pay peanuts, get monkeys

As opposed to now with all the highly qualified congresspersons.

This is an incredibly pedantic argument. The common interfaces for LLMs set their temperature value to non-zero, so they are effectively non-deterministic.

Guess you should have used your eyes and brain instead of outsourcing it to a chat bot

If you're only reading the comments you have no clue how often it actually works as a summary.

A car could win a bike race too

If it was as simple as telling the LLM not to hallucinate every system prompt would just say "don't hallucinate" and we wouldn't have hallucinations

The GOP is not a party of small/limited government people. It's a party of people who want absolute control and use the language of small/limited government to gain power.

If a democratic president is elected they will reverse their decisions until a GOP president is elected again.

Oh please, the billionaires who control these things aren't going to share the wealth with the people they put out of work. They're going to suck as many of us dry as they possibly can

"As long as the bills are paid" is the key point. They won't be because people will be out of a job with no safety net

If privacy is your primary concern I would 100% trust Cloudflare or Google over an ISP in the US

This is why the children of rich people are famously well adjusted... /s

Eventually the economics will correct themselves once people yet again learn the old "you get what you pay for" lesson (or the more modern FAFO lesson)

The number of things it can actually do is significantly lower than the number of things the hype men are claiming it can do.

Yes, and the other half they had the option to use AI. That's why I said they were allowed to pick whether or not to use AI on a subset of tasks. On the other subset they were not allowed to use AI.

Directly from the paper:

If AI is allowed, developers can use any AI tools or models they choose, including no AI tooling if they expect it to not be helpful. If AI is not allowed, no generative AI tooling can be used.

AI is allowed not required

And they weren't allowed to pick which tasks they used the AI on.

They were allowed to pick whether or not to use AI on a subset of tasks. They weren't forced to use AI on tasks that don't make sense for AI

Another factor is funding cuts to both telescopes contained in the Trump administration’s budget proposal for 2026 — especially JWST, which would see its operating budget cut by 25 percent relative to planned 2024 operations, from $187 million to $140 million.

Did you?

Another factor is funding cuts to both telescopes contained in the Trump administration’s budget proposal for 2026 — especially JWST, which would see its operating budget cut by 25 percent relative to planned 2024 operations, from $187 million to $140 million.

No

I have never experienced this on iOS. I just tested it in Google maps and despite having Chrome installed it opened in Safari (my default) with no prompting or extra steps, it just immediately opened Safari

It seems to work fine in the USA? Lots of guns illegal in California are legal elsewhere? There are also lots of municipalities that ban guns like NYC

It works as well as having a peeing section in the pool

I would counter with:

Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon

This is a story about politics, not related to tech in any way, and is not some new phenomenon

How is this relevant to HN at all outside of being written by "rationalists" that are predominately techies?