darkarmani

Do you know something about this that no one else knows? How many innocent people do you think are mentioned in those millions of documents?

Did he predict odds? How are you so sure his odds were wrong?

or simply look at outcomes. Good work being done at the FDA, just fact.

A good outcome doesn't mean there was good work being done. You are conflating the two. You can make bad decisions and still have a good outcome.

I'm happy that this looks like a good outcome, but the current FDA is doing terrible work.

co2 will cook the planet

It doesn't have to cook the planet to cause massive suffering. Do you think there hasn't been global warming? What amount of global warming would change your mind?

Are you sure it is just clay? Sandy clay packs even tighter than just clay: https://www.uaex.uada.edu/farm-ranch/crops-commercial-hortic...

"If you mix sand into clay, the clay particles will fill in all the open spaces between the sand particles and often the clay will act as a ‘glue’ sticking all particles together, ultimately resulting in a more dense soil."

they should have oversight

Congress provides oversight and accountability of the Fed. The GAO does audits as well. Frank-Dodd provides more windows into the Fed. Why did you think the Fed doesn't have oversight?

Not ever passing an audit of any kind

It might have been hard for you to find because it is hidden under the "audit" page on their website: https://www.federalreserve.gov/regreform/audit.htm

Why is the independence of the Federal Reserve sacrosanct?

It's never been completely independent. It's independent from short-term (4 years) political influence. It's audited and has congressional oversight and the President nominates people to the board.

What else do you want? Interest rates set by Presidential tweets?

One can not be happy with that and understand that Trump would have found ways to lock up his son for 20 years. No one thinks this dude was going to be punished for political reasons.

Is the schema considered private information or just information not required to be released via FOIA? ie: Can't some nice employee leak this information or is it legally protected?

Once the information is released, can anyone can make FOIA requests using the schema?

The gov't releasing the hardware and software licencing used in CANVAS already gives that away.

They could have taken legal actions against Sectigo's CCO directly

You are only suggesting they could have handled it worse. Why would they take legal action against the CCO for statements on a bug report other than to squash transparency?

If DigiCert is about to do something crazy like take down all your websites, courts are generally willing to put a temporary stop to it without understanding all the details. "Preserve the status quo" and "prevent irreparable harm" are the buzzwords.

So if DigiCert's irreparable harm was great would that prevent it? Like legally requiring CAs to follow their revocation policies or pay millions in damages?

That sounds like a legal height then.

They don't need approval for under 400 FT AGL in class G airspace.

The idiots reporting on it have NO idea how high these drones are. And the military has a bunch of carved airspace in various places. I think last time i looked (4 weeks ago), there was some reserved airspace off Cape Hatteras for the US Marines.

despite the drones being bigger and higher tech than retail drones.

How does anyone know how big these are? I've heard reports like this:

1. They looks larger than normal drones. 2. The look like they are operating at a height greater than 400 ft AGL.

How do they know the height? If they don't know the height, they certainly don't know the size. If it looks large, it isn't very high.

If it is large and high, I would think they would get some radar contacts.

If these are heavier than 55 pounds, I think we'd see the FAA jumping all over it. I also don't see why any LE would announce that they are actively figuring it out as they'd want to keep the element of surprise and track the drone back to the operators.

Why isn't anyone bringing them down?

Only federal authorities can do anything to aircraft. This is in the realm of the FAA.

How can anyone know these aren't a threat without knowing whose they are?

What kind of threat are we worried about here that wasn't around yesterday (last year)?

White House says they aren't foreign adversaries I don't think the military is going to reveal its methods and capabilities.

Yes the court's judgment is so high, 1B USD, that he cannot make money without it being garnished. How does he get back to work? I personally do not think anyone should lose their livelihood over speech

He was harassing parents of dead children in order to personally enrich himself. Why do you think he shouldn't have to forgo his ill begotten gains? It's only 1B USD, because he refused to stop doing it. And then he decided not to really show up for court and accept the summary judgement of 1B USD.

Most of his penalty has nothing to do with speech. He can keep on speaking all he wants. He might suffer consequences, but he is free to say whatever he wants to.

How could Hillary lose if she had an 80% chance? That seems impossible (if i'm bad at math)!

Instead of a pihole, you'd run a https proxy that doesn't trust the certs i guess.

Oh! That is a good way to conflate the issue. "It's for signing and verification."

That definitely has almost nothing to do with TLS and browsers. Why does my browser need to verify national ID cards? (no need to answer that)

It's not a "security check" it's just informing the user about their certs...

The second they do that the entire internet is going to download it to see what the fuss is about.

While they could legally do that, it's going to blow up in their face if they did it. I remember the old crypto export wars in the US and OpenBSD being based in Canada so they could ship string crypto in SSH.

don't leave sensitive data out there

Where "out there" is Okta. You are basically saying: Don't leave sensitive data with Okta.

"yet another Okta compromise" sounds passive to you?

802.1x. At least that was what could be used 12 years ago. I don't know about state of the art now.

Make it a legal requirement for parents to set up this option for their children on every device they use.

Why? Let the parents decide -- they now have the controls they need.

Make it illegal to send invalid "safe content" headers.

Just make them cryptographically signed. Anything without a valid signed header is "adult".

Hashicorp wouldn't have a successful product if they hadn't open sourced their code.

Now that they are entrenched, they want to change rules (and whine about it) because it makes them more money.

Isn't that totally different? I thought brick and mortar stores actually buy inventory (or commit to buy orders in this age of just-in-time) where Amazon is just the middleman connecting buyers and sellers and charging fees on both ends.

If Amazon wants to commit to certain sizes of orders, I'm sure the vendors will be happy with contractual price setting.

So every URL is a trespass unless you have explicit permission?

If you say the protocol determines authorization, then the Fizz protocol granted them authorization. I don't have a clear answer here because it is messy.

It's not hell because they carefully curate the set of libraries rather than having end-users attempt to have every combination of packages (and then blame microsoft for the dependency hell / lack of support for their exact configuration.).

I'm not sure why that is a problem. He didn't have to know anything about Anaconda. And for stability, you can still install 10-year old python 2.7 packages from Anaconda.

9 months is no problem at all for stability.

It's the dependency hell problem as packages are added to the sandbox environment. If they were just shipping python (standard library), it would be fine, but all of the useful libraries have large numbers of dependencies.