HN user

danwolff

3 karma

Email: danielyc@danwolff.net

Posts3
Comments32
View on HN
  Location: Mountain View, California
  Remote: OK
  Willing to relocate: Yes
  Technologies: Pythonic ETL, basic Python, SQL, databases (e.g. Athena/Trino/Presto, Glue, Hive, Postgres, RDS), GNU/Linux fundamentals, shell scripting, general engineering sense
  Résumé/CV: https://danwolff.net/dw-resume-yc.pdf
  Email: danielyc@danwolff.net
I have been a professional data engineer/person for ten years. I have seen some stuff in both small and large companies. I try to do things well.

The startup I was with for over a year sadly had to let a bunch of core staff go about one month ago. So, I am currently available full time. Do you need a solid person to help with your data or related activities?

(As an aside, I also have a serious appreciation for "real hypertext" in the sense of Paul Otlet, Ted Nelson, and Doug Engelbart, in case that happens to resonate with your organization's ethos.)

IMHO Workplace was a fantastic product that filled a gap that is really is not filled by anything else today (although a lot of other tools might seem similar).

Probably, most people had and still have no real idea of the product's existence. And once people do learn of it, they still really have no idea what this kind of product can do for orgs (that is, how they could really use it).

I have to think that some of the magic comes from having an org and people in the org who know how to use such a tool?

It seemed an honest shot at really improving orgs based on communication and I was pretty jazzed about it. The remaining options are seem far sub-par in some ways (even if features look/seem similar, the overall gestalt is not the same IMO).

  Location: Mountain View, California, USA
  Remote: OK
  Willing to relocate: Yes
  Technologies: Pythonic ETL!  (Basic Python, SQL, databases [Athena/Trino/Presto, Glue, Hive, Postgres, RDS], GNU/Linux fundamentals, shell scripting, general engineering sense)
  Résumé/CV: https://danwolff.net/dw-resume-yc.pdf
  Email: danielyc@danwolff.net
I am a STICKLER for HIGH QUALITY and WELL-WRITTEN, READABLE, and EXPLICIT classic-style data pipelines. This comes from a large dose of Dataswarm experience, and now a decent amount of recent Airflow (MWAA) experience. Can you tell that I am passionate about Pythonic ETL/Dataswarm/Airflow? If you need to make Pythonic data pipelines happen, at any stage of maturity (no data infra to huge data infra), I have a feeling that I could help, and we just might both enjoy talking!

I just came back on the market TODAY, in fact.

(Note: The above is fairly specific and technical, and is tailored for the chance that you know what you want and that there might be an obvious possible match. If you have more general or related needs, then my broader capabilities may apply, too, of course. Thus, please feel free to send an email if you suspect a fit but don't see it spelled out per se. Still, if the above strikes a chord, then that's potentially phenomenal, too.)

  Location: Mountain View, CA
  Remote: Yes, preferred (Onsite/hybrid also works; onsite could be awesome, too.)
  Willing to relocate: Yes (Anywhere is great! Especially interesting appear to be: AZ, ID, MO, ND, OK, TX, UT)
  Technologies: Python, Bash, SQL, GNU/Linux and associated utility basics, Pythonic ETL, basic HTML/CSS, Meta/Fb internal data tools
  Résumé/CV: https://danwolff.net/dw-resume-yc.pdf
  Email: danielyc@danwolff.net
OVERVIEW: My main experiences in industry have been in data at social media. I had a small background in design engineering before that. All the while, I have nursed a 15-year side-saga in logical communication interfaces.

WHAT I BRING: I have both big and startup tech experience. I have done consulting and FTE work, and love both. I have a significant driving passion for technology as a potential aid for people, particularly real hypertext as applicable to helping people through IA in the Otletian/Nelsonian/Engelbartian sense.

ALSO OPEN TO (FOR CLARITY): While my main background has been solidly data engineering, I am also very open to adjacent/interesting work. (For instance, someone once said that everyone should do software sales for a while, and while I would be green at it, I would be very open to considering ideas like this.)

STORY: Broad startup layoff within past month--energized about finding an awesome fit to help out!

Corporate site: http://oneslate.com.

Not sure if you can see the "text" above, but 1Slate is a free public forum offering a uniquely simplified and (IMO) elegant "real hypermedia" implementation.

There is utility in the relatively simple N-way linking with tranclusion (reuse objects) and in-context autosuggest, consistent edge meaning (support), 5-bin statistics, unlimited private collaborators, etc.

What do you think? Does this speak to ANYONE?

The colon at the end of the first line was intended to map the first text string to the last text string of my original post. So, you're right, and sorry for the confusing grammar.

Do it. Easily the easiest $7k I ever made was the result of a (carefully crafted but not difficultly formulated) 60 second email requesting more money in response to the engineering job offer that I accepted out of college.

Remember to include some examples of why you deserve it--this way, the hiring agent can use the same reasons to make an easy decision.

"NaN-tagging: 64 bit tagged values are used for stack slots and table slots. Unboxed floating-point numbers (doubles) are overlayed with tagged object references. The latter can be distinguished from numbers via the use of special NaNs as tags. It's a remote descendant of pointer-tagging.

[The idea dates back to 2006, but I haven't disclosed it before 2008. Special NaNs have been used to overlay pointers before. Others have used it for tagging later on. The specific layout is of my own devising.]" [1]

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.lua.general/58908

Inventables a University of Illinois startup.

If you play with several dozen of their materials, you will get several product ideas, some olf which may even have markets!

I think they are trying to provide value through all the normal ways an online reseller would, with a bent for the entrepeneurial inventer market.

At least that'd the impression that I get. For large quantities I would hazard the guess that no party misses out on the pie.

Sure, posts to HN (or, say, most such places) should probably point to the original source unless some value is added in the other site. I can see that some value is added to subscribers of that Posterous feed, however, since it means fewer links to follow and guarantees readable text. So, I am unconvinced that this is a problem with the Posterous community. The reposter is minimizing the effort to consume content for his followers. That the souece link is small is inconsequential--the entire quotation is explicitly formatted and hence immediately understood as such. All one has to do to see the original formatting, discussion, etc. is follow a link; maybe the Posterous user estimates that less than the weighted majority of his audience wants to visit the full site at the point of Posterous consumption. To criticize the use of what is really a feed aggregator for doing just that is a bit like criticizing evolution. Maybe the reposter decided that the content was important enough to reproduce in full to increase the odds of its consumption by his subscribers. Hell, I'll read Jessica Livingston's textual content in Posterous but rarely follow most links from gmail if just catching up on a mobile device. In fact, an arument might be made that a higher quality of content/traffic is achieved in the long run for Quora due to the ability of posts like this to dissemminate its content.

That said, I barely use Posterous, so a member of the "community" would be in a better position to comment (and maybe this has already occurred theough the upvoting of the parent), but I felt like the parent had some pretty harsh words which needed to be addressed due to their generality.

Are there some studies on short format content reproduction producing a net detriment (and no wisecracks about ehow)?

You are correct, of course. It is so frustrating that I've justified it for the incorrect as a shortening of:

I could (exhibit that I) care less (because I do care less than I currently exhibit).

Or, as a matter of giving the benefit of the doubt:

I could (exhibit that I) care less (because I am, through effort, caring more right now than I would naturally).