HN user

danielmorozoff

1,658 karma

Working on a startup project.

Posts240
Comments203
View on HN
fortune.com 1d ago

Hugging Face says it resorted to a Chinese AI model

danielmorozoff
12pts2
deepmind.google 1mo ago

From AGI to ASI

danielmorozoff
5pts2
arxiv.org 1mo ago

From AGI to ASI

danielmorozoff
3pts0
www.youtube.com 1mo ago

Tech Whistleblower: You Only Have 3 Years Left Before It Hits – Mo Gawdat [video]

danielmorozoff
2pts0
www.popularmechanics.com 1mo ago

Scientists Found a New Type of Crystal Formed by the First Nuclear Explosion

danielmorozoff
1pts0
www.wired.com 2mo ago

Nick Bostrom Has a Plan for Humanity's 'Big Retirement'

danielmorozoff
3pts0
www.businesswire.com 2mo ago

Study Reveals 75% of Enterprises Report Double-Digit AI Failure Rates

danielmorozoff
10pts2
philpapers.org 3mo ago

The Abstraction Fallacy: Why AI Can Simulate but Not Instantiate Consciousness [pdf]

danielmorozoff
1pts0
hai.stanford.edu 3mo ago

Artificial Intelligence Index Report [pdf]

danielmorozoff
1pts0
news.columbia.edu 3mo ago

How Do You See What Cannot Be Seen?

danielmorozoff
2pts0
github.com 3mo ago

Google: MCP Toolbox

danielmorozoff
2pts1
github.com 3mo ago

Claude Scholar

danielmorozoff
1pts0
arxiv.org 3mo ago

Thought Virus: Subliminal Prompting in Multi-Agent Systems

danielmorozoff
2pts0
www.sciencedaily.com 3mo ago

The brain might not create consciousness after all

danielmorozoff
4pts0
www.nature.com 3mo ago

Why AI hasn't caused a job apocalypse – so far

danielmorozoff
2pts0
www.nature.com 3mo ago

Can a mouse be cloned indefinitely?

danielmorozoff
6pts1
github.com 4mo ago

Mirofish: A Simple and Universal Swarm Intelligence Engine

danielmorozoff
1pts0
zzk273.github.io 4mo ago

Learning athletic humanoid tennis skills from imperfect human motion data

danielmorozoff
177pts40
www.theaustralian.com.au 4mo ago

Tech boss uses AI and ChatGPT to create cancer vaccine for his dying dog

danielmorozoff
3pts0
twitter.com 4mo ago

The First Multi-Behavior Brain Upload

danielmorozoff
3pts1
github.com 4mo ago

Training neural networks on Apple Neural Engine

danielmorozoff
3pts0
finance.yahoo.com 4mo ago

CesiumAstro Announces Acquisition of Vidrovr

danielmorozoff
1pts0
www.theatlantic.com 4mo ago

The Edge of Mathematics

danielmorozoff
4pts0
garymarcus.substack.com 4mo ago

Turns out Generative AI was a scam

danielmorozoff
8pts1
www.ft.com 5mo ago

Ukraine's no man's land is the future of war

danielmorozoff
4pts0
www.youtube.com 5mo ago

Terry Tao – Machine assistance and the future of research mathematics [video]

danielmorozoff
2pts0
www.dwarkesh.com 5mo ago

Dario Amodei – "We are near the end of the exponential" [video]

danielmorozoff
118pts254
arxiv.org 5mo ago

Accelerating Scientific Research with Gemini: Case Studies and Common Techniques

danielmorozoff
1pts0
theconversation.com 6mo ago

How the French philosopher Jean Baudrillard predicted today's AI 30 years Ago

danielmorozoff
8pts1
www.wired.com 7mo ago

Sam Altman's New Brain Venture, Merge Labs, Will Spin Out of a Nonprofit

danielmorozoff
2pts0

This is a specific section of the report::

Section 5.5.2: The “Spiritual Bliss” Attractor State

The consistent gravitation toward consciousness exploration, existential questioning, and spiritual/mystical themes in extended interactions was a remarkably strong and unexpected attractor state for Claude Opus 4 that emerged without intentional training for such behaviors.

Vidrovr Inc | US | Remote | Full-Time

Vidrovr makes video useful. We use machine learning to turn disorganized heaps of media and tangles of live feeds into beautifully structured metadata to drive actions and business decisions for our users. We enable previously impossible applications, at previously impossible scales.

We are a small team with self-sustaining - and growing - revenues. Our notable major partners include The AP, the USAF, CNBC, the German Marshall Fund, DHS, FOX sports, and more.

Vidrovr fosters an open, supportive engineering culture emphasizing curiosity, self-teaching, and fearlessness. Engineering is a very small team with fewer than ten members, and there is ample opportunity to learn outside your domain of expertise. Our organization is fairly flat: you'll have direct access to company leadership, insight into strategic conversations, and avenues for direct involvement in major decisions.

We are fully remote. Vidrovr does not currently maintain a physical office. About half of our team is based in New York, with other members in Knoxville, Atlanta, Boston, Seattle, and Mexico City. Being fully remote, we highly value good communication skills!

Vidrovr provides unlimited PTO, and we're serious about it. We periodically require engineers to take time off if they have not recently. We value your independence: we expect quality engineering, not your soul.

Engineering: - Apply Here (Senior Full Stack): https://www.squarepeghires.com/jobs/8e9jkp/senior-software-e...

Vidrovr | https://vidrovr.com | Senior FE/Full Stack, QA and Application Engineer | REMOTE | Full-time

Vidrovr makes video useful. We use machine learning to turn disorganized heaps of media and tangles of live feeds into beautifully structured metadata to drive actions and business decisions for our users. We enable previously impossible applications, at previously impossible scales.

We are a small team with self-sustaining - and growing - revenues. Our notable major partners include The AP, the USAF, CNBC, the German Marshall Fund, DHS, FOX sports, and more.

Vidrovr fosters an open, supportive engineering culture emphasizing curiosity, self-teaching, and fearlessness. Engineering is a very small team with fewer than ten members, and there is ample opportunity to learn outside your domain of expertise. Our organization is fairly flat: you'll have direct access to company leadership, insight into strategic conversations, and avenues for direct involvement in major decisions.

We are fully remote. Vidrovr does not currently maintain a physical office. About half of our team is based in New York, with other members in Knoxville, Atlanta, Boston, Seattle, and Mexico City. Being fully remote, we highly value good communication skills!

Vidrovr provides unlimited PTO, and we're serious about it. We periodically require engineers to take time off if they have not recently. We value your independence: we expect quality engineering, not your soul.

Apply Here (FE Eng): https://www.squarepeghires.com/jobs/8zo1xp/senior-frontend-e...

Apply Here (Full Stack Eng): https://www.squarepeghires.com/jobs/pdw3nr/copy-senior-softw...

Apply Here (Senior Quality Assurance (QA) Engineer): https://www.squarepeghires.com/jobs/r034jr/senior-qa-enginee...

Apply Here (Application Eng): https://www.squarepeghires.com/jobs/pj736p/application-engin...

Vidrovr | https://vidrovr.com | Senior FE/Full Stack Engineer | REMOTE | Full-time

Vidrovr makes video useful. We use machine learning to turn disorganized heaps of media and tangles of live feeds into beautifully structured metadata to drive actions and business decisions for our users. We enable previously impossible applications, at previously impossible scales.

We are a small team with self-sustaining - and growing - revenues. Our notable major partners include The AP, the USAF, CNBC, the German Marshall Fund, DHS, FOX sports, and more.

Vidrovr fosters an open, supportive engineering culture emphasizing curiosity, self-teaching, and fearlessness. Engineering is a very small team with fewer than ten members, and there is ample opportunity to learn outside your domain of expertise. Our organization is fairly flat: you'll have direct access to company leadership, insight into strategic conversations, and avenues for direct involvement in major decisions.

We are fully remote. Vidrovr does not currently maintain a physical office. About half of our team is based in New York, with other members in Knoxville, Atlanta, Boston, Seattle, and Mexico City. Being fully remote, we highly value good communication skills!

Vidrovr provides unlimited PTO, and we're serious about it. We periodically require engineers to take time off if they have not recently. We value your independence: we expect quality engineering, not your soul.

Apply Here (FE Eng): https://www.squarepeghires.com/jobs/8zo1xp/senior-frontend-e... Apply Here (Full Stack Eng): https://www.squarepeghires.com/jobs/r4end8/senior-software-e...

Vidrovr | Engineering | Remote | Full-Time

Vidrovr (https://www.vidrovr.com) unlocks insights trapped in unstructured multimedia data, such as audio, image and video, generated by businesses and governments. Vidrovr uses AI to automate manual tasks that people perform to utilize these data assets. This leads to x5 efficiency gains in performing their work. Vidrovr spun out of Columbia University's AI lab and has been invested in by premiere investors including Samsung Next and Verizon.

Vidrovr’s processing engine can streamline business operations that utilize unstructured data, through the use of various AI models and tools to extract and model insights locked in your data. Vidrovr currently services clients in a number of industries - including media companies like the AP and financial institutions. Additionally, Vidrovr provides services to various USG organizations.

More details on our careers page: https://www.vidrovr.com/careers

We are looking for: - Full Stack Engineer - ML Pipeline Engineer / Data Engineering

If you are interested please shoot me a note: contact@vidrovr.com

Respectfully, I disagree. The point you make about financial freedom, imho is an illusion. A few thoughts on your first point.

The NSF Career grant affords you the latitude to pursue your research interests, but those are inevitably aligned with the academic process as you are in pursuit of tenure. So you need to publish and you need to produce publishable work- very unlikely you will choose only high risk moonshot projects as your likelihood of receiving tenure is directly correlated to those publications. Furthermore, your statement that the NSF or the university is not an investor, is also flawed imo. The NSF specifically asks for impact as it ties the money it allots a research to economic impact to the US- as it should since it is tax payer money. I.e your investor is the US. A similar argument can be drawn to the university that provides you startup lab funds- their long term goal is to receive publications/ patents/ prestige they can the monetize against through either selling those ideas/ receiving royalties or donations go their foundations. As you become a more famous researcher you also attract more masters students who pay a good deal of money to go to school there. They are in fact your investor only expecting a different ROI...

As for companies- how much do you think an engineer or ml researcher costs per year to a company especially the caliber in a Phd lab? 500k expense is pretty small. your assumption that a company wont give you 500k to fo work is an illusion- they do it's just not hard cash, they spend on resources that you use. An average PhD level base salary at a Fang - 200+k plus bonus/ equity closing on over 300k?

So the real question is pick your poison.

Having written NSF grants and other grants - DARPA etc. I have won some and lost many. I compiled a few non obvious takeaways:

- Story telling is everything. It seems this is a huge lesson never taught in grad school.

- Technical details sometimes work against you. The author is absolutely right that getting the general thought process across is crucial.

- Who you get on your review committee tends to significantly skew the outcome. Can make or break your chances.

- I have known a lot of groundbreaking work funded by other money for these exact reasons. Sometimes good science is too far afield for people to understand. An anecdote i like from recent times is how Eric Betzig built the super res microscope. Here's the background.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2015/04/quitting-failures-a-...

TLDR: he won the Nobel...

The sad truth is $500k for a career grant seems like a lot when you're in the university, but when you get out and see where else money is being spent you realize how poor academia really is.

It seems to me the biggest challenge for SE transitioning into ML is that ML is a very broad topic and people conflate a lot of roles together. From purely research based questions (backbones, optimizers, initializers etc), to more 'MLOps' like pipelining questions, which tend to fall into the classical engineering / dev ops buckets. So the real question is what type of ML do you want to do?

If you're looking to land a job at FAIR / Deepmind or Google Brain/ Nvidia Research as a researcher or ML scientist the expectations of knowledge are very different than 'data science'. These are research lab groups, that work on pushing the state of the art forward. They are also supported by great engineers, building awesome tools that improve ML research. So transitioning into this sort of role requires more than doing Kaggle competitions, it requires developing an intuition for the respective ML subfield / and trying new things and usually failing. i.e. this is a research role and will require a lot of study and learning

If on the other hand you are looking for datascience / take model and build pipeline to run AI, or perform hyper param sweeps or simply modify some model code, then on I would say that is much more engineering than research ML. This has a much lower barrier to entry coming from engineering and could be a good stepping stone to a transition into pure ML research.

On a more general note to consider when thinking of transitioning to ML is that these systems are probabilistic in nature vs purely deterministic as they are in more general software systems. People (ie humans) are bad at wrapping their heads around distributional processes - you can see this in all fields that deal with them (Quantum vs Classical Physics, Biological Systems etc).

In general I guess what I have seen is when engineers try to dip their toes into ML, what's required is a mindset shift in how to approach problems. Once that happens the depth of that shift determines the type of role with ML you wish to pursue.

You bring up a valid and important distinction that i have heard before surrounding liberal arts vs research unis. Having attended the latter, I have no personal experience to compare, but have heard much more positive reviews of liberal arts education from those who studied maths there.

Again I believe the incentive structures at teaching universities properly match what students are there to accomplish, whereas at research unis they tend to be muddled.

Having also attended both public and ivy league schools in STEM from undergrad to PhD levels I can say from what I have seen there is a huge lack in mathematics education. This is especially true in the lower undergrad courses where profs see it as a burden to deal with in terms of teaching and the classes devolve into mechanistic / memorization exercises. very few teach students to reason with mathematics mostly prb bc 1 the profs are bad or disinterested teachers or 2 bc the profs have fundamentally other interests and are forced to each elementary classes in subjects they may mot have an affinity for or deep knowledge in- ie functional analysis or prob theory ... Once you get into the later classes math education steeply improves where fundamental questions are investigated and asked. i remember auditing a math physics class with 4 students and a prof al phd students - it was incredible and was totally outside of my area of research.

all this to say i think undergrad math education is poorly designed/ incentivized and run in my experience and leads to a huge loss of talent from the practice and art of mathematics.

Received email this morning: "Commercial use of Docker Desktop in larger enterprises (more than 250 employees OR more than $10 million USD in annual revenue) now requires a paid subscription"

pretty much everything. Connectome != functional understanding of the brain. We have had c elegans ( worm) and more recently fly connectomes for years. we are still struggling to understand basic logic encodings in those animal models. Imho we lack a foundational understanding of the logic encoding mechanisms in the brain. Many neuroscientists/ computer scientists are working on this problem, but to my knowledge we are still not there.