HN user

danielamitay

979 karma

github: danielamitay web: danielamitay.com

Posts32
Comments80
View on HN
www.facebook.com 5y ago

Preparing Our Partners for iOS 14

danielamitay
259pts301
www.snap.com 9y ago

Introducing Snap Map

danielamitay
7pts0
danielamitay.com 11y ago

Shutting Down a Service with 500M Requests per Month

danielamitay
104pts57
fiveminutes.gs 11y ago

FIVE MINUTES – Interactive Short

danielamitay
3pts2
www.lcrnd.com 13y ago

Free App Strategy Advice

danielamitay
1pts0
techcrunch.com 13y ago

In Defense Of The Humble App Walkthrough

danielamitay
1pts0
winterba.sh 13y ago

Stack Exchange's Winter Bash 2012

danielamitay
3pts0
techcrunch.com 13y ago

Half Of The Forbes’ 30 Under 30 In Tech Are Y Combinator Alums

danielamitay
7pts0
techcrunch.com 14y ago

It’s Not A Bursting Bubble. It’s a Correction.

danielamitay
2pts0
techcrunch.com 14y ago

YC-Funded ScreenLeap: Screen-Sharing Doesn’t Need To Make You Crazy

danielamitay
71pts25
techcrunch.com 14y ago

Curebit Apologizes for Copying 37Signals

danielamitay
9pts0
techcrunch.com 14y ago

A Tale Of Two Cities: Silicon Valley And Hollywood

danielamitay
5pts0
techcrunch.com 14y ago

GrubWithUs Goes Mobile With A (Really Pretty) iPhone App

danielamitay
43pts10
www.amitay.us 15y ago

11 months after iOS 4.0, 31% of apps don’t multitask [App File Stats]

danielamitay
24pts23
eu.techcrunch.com 15y ago

Do I hear $50m? The bidding war is on for Tweetdeck’s top-end users

danielamitay
1pts0
techcrunch.com 15y ago

Kutiman Killed The Video Star (Again)

danielamitay
1pts0
www.amitay.us 15y ago

How To Detect Installed iOS Apps - iHasApp API

danielamitay
9pts0
amitay.us 15y ago

Piracy Doubled My App Sales

danielamitay
131pts72
www.youtube.com 15y ago

YouTube - Filmography 2010

danielamitay
5pts0
arstechnica.com 15y ago

Imagine a world where every app has its own data plan

danielamitay
44pts31
www.businesswire.com 15y ago

LinkedIn Says Most Overused Buzzwords Are...

danielamitay
73pts34
arstechnica.com 15y ago

Researchers turn bacterial colonies into logic gates

danielamitay
8pts0
arstechnica.com 15y ago

Operation: Payback changes course, may be fizzling out

danielamitay
2pts0
techcrunch.com 15y ago

Groupon’s Andrew Mason To Charlie Rose: “We Are The ‘N Sync Of Websites”

danielamitay
36pts12
techcrunch.com 15y ago

Anonymous Shifts On WikiLeaks Strategy, Announces It With A Press Release

danielamitay
3pts0
techcrunch.com 15y ago

If Chatroulette Had Facebook Connect, People Would Keep Their Pants On

danielamitay
10pts11
techcrunch.com 15y ago

Microsoft: “Yeah, We Tried To Acquire Facebook.”

danielamitay
8pts1
arstechnica.com 15y ago

Chrome Web Store: a solution in search of a problem?

danielamitay
2pts0
techcrunch.com 15y ago

Andreesen Horowitz And Index Lead $25 Million Round For Big Data Startup Factual

danielamitay
2pts0
www.huffingtonpost.com 15y ago

Journalism is not an Attack, Wikileaks is not Warfare

danielamitay
4pts0

The main issue is the conflating of usage and value. The persona/user group that consumes the Trending pages are likely users who themselves contribute to open source, and thus are part of a flywheel that drives more code contribution overall. (e.g. how 1% of users post on reddit vs 99% consume) Not all usage is made equally.

This scenario reminds me of a funny story posted on HN a while ago: https://memex.marginalia.nu/log/48-i-have-no-capslock.gmi (TL;DR; if you take this "usage based" feature removal logic to it's conclusion, a lot of important keys would be removed from computers/keyboards).

The site and data normalization are great. The problem is that applying the phrase "best case scenario" is simply false, and it is just a distraction that was not necessary on the site.

Amortizing my entire data usage over my entire cell plan (which includes talk & text), costs me literally $0.001/MB.

You should not present $0.24/MB (US|Prepaid) as the "Best case scenario" when someone on a standard AT&T plan pays 240x less.

"Make sure everyone speaks"

From personal experience in a YC interview: My cofounders and I decided we would speak and answer in turns. The problem we ultimately ran into after a few minutes was that one of our interviewers asked, "so who is the CEO?" Inside, we knew that was a bad sign (I believe I've heard PG say that it's a very bad sign).

It probably wasn't the only reason we were ultimately rejected, but it certainly didn't help. Looking back on that experience, one of the things I would have changed would be the author's next bit of advice:

"Generally speaking, there will be one person that answers most of the time"

[Edit] People have asked why I felt that being asked "so who is the CEO?" was a bad sign: https://youtu.be/JK3sVFs6_rs?t=175

"It's really bad if we're talking to a bunch of founders and we can't figure out who the leader is..."

Again... This was one YC interview a number of years ago, and I of course have no real insight into the final impression we left on our interviewers. Just something that I remember not feeling great about in hindsight.

Airtime | New York City, NY | Mobile Engineer (iOS)

We are building really cool things in the real-time video space, and have been quietly experimenting and iterating on a number of projects and technology. We all know that video chat is powerful, but has not been done quite right… yet. This will not be your average iOS app—we are building something beautiful with very powerful video chat and online connectivity under the hood.

We are looking for another iOS developer to help us build the next big thing and change the way people interact with each other. You would sit next to and work with me personally, and I can promise that you will be proud of what you are building.

If this sounds interesting, feel free to email me at: dan@airtime.com

Let us suppose that there is an organized group of Bitcoin enthusiasts with a combined amount of Bitcoin holdings of around 100,000BTC. Would an article "App.net begins accepting Bitcoin" increase the BTC/USD exchange rate by more than 0.01%?

To me it seems that a continued stream of press is good for Bitcoin, and I am genuinely curious is there is such a group of enthusiasts that strategically spend Bitcoins for PR.

Those are examples of predicting demand changes on a macro scale.

Amazon wants to do this on a more micro, person-by-person level. For example, you visit a product page for some specialty shampoo. Amazon might decide to ship that product before you even add it to your cart.

Without addressing the issue of tax loopholes in general, there is a logical rationale for lower taxes on capital gains (for Schwarzman, Buffett & co):

- It's a double tax, as money that was invested had already been previously taxed.

- It does not account for inflation. If an investment grows only with inflation, capital gains taxes still need to be paid on that growth.

The software simply attempts to read the device's root folder. Success == Jailbroken.

Piracy detection involves checking the app executable's compile time, permissions and similar.

The methods change from time to time, but that is basically the gist.

I've found two apps using it so far.

That's the thing: I wish more people would notify you when they use your open source stuff. Attribution means less to me than simply knowing that it's being used.

Basically, I derive a significant amount of esteem and happiness from making things that people use. It was this that lead myself and those around me to believe I should pursue Engineering. Unfortunately, I derived very little to no esteem from what I felt was merely "book learning" at Cooper. The school system I grew up in was extremely liberal and forward-thinking, so Cooper Union felt extremely rigid to me (although I acknowledge the possibility that all Engineering programs are like this). I simply couldn't survive four years like that.

Ultimately, I studied Economics at NYU, so I moved away from Engineering to allow myself to pursue development on my own. There are other reasons why I moved to Economics, but thats the gist of it.

I understand the financial mistakes (underperforming investments). I understand the building mistakes (extravagance, over-spending). What I don't understand is this policy that will (in my opinion) destroy The Cooper Union's core asset: the student body. Having attended, I whole-heartedly believe that nearly all of Cooper Union's value-add is in being surrounded by incredibly intelligent peers. Peers who are now less likely to apply or attend.

Me: Spent two years at Cooper, currently graduating from NYU.

Aside from the "Some important lessons" section (which seemed very patronizing, although OXO seems to be in the right here considering the expired patent aspect), it seems that OXO handled themselves pretty well. It pointed out Quirky's side of things, and then presented their own side. With quite a bit of citation where appropriate.

Quirky[1] went straight for the "justice" aspect in their post without presenting much info or even a cursory discussion of related patents.

[1] http://www.quirky.com/blog/post/2013/01/rise-up-quirky-seeks...

Interestingly enough, my participation on Twitter was spurred and continually maintained via OSS and GitHub. So this is really welcome on my end (although I wouldn't mind extra info such as watchers and forks).

It is a bit weird though: the displayed image is the project owner's profile image, which doesn't seem directly relevant, and seems a bit out of place.

If that bread is being imported from outside the city, then yes. What a good grocery store.

Per Uber (and even PandoDaily), the available driver supply has indeed risen due to prices. Without the price increase, some drivers wouldn't consider it worth the painful traffic.

And lets not forget: It's not like the folks at Uber flipped a switch and doubled the rates. Their system responds to demand automatically--it doesn't know when there is a disaster.

As an East Village resident who fled yesterday (post-Sandy) due to loss of power and even cell service, I'm siding with Uber on this one.

When I needed to go 60+ blocks uptown, I didn't manage to hail a cab because every single one was taken, and only because of a private car (who separately charged three individuals for a concurrent ride, literally a 3X fare) did I manage to get to my destination without carrying my heavy duffel + gear for an hour or more in the drizzle.

In this situation, price is not the problem, it's supply.

Edit: From what I can tell, Uber now locked rates at 2X, and is eating half of the fare. That's pretty darn generous.

> "Write a program that prints the numbers from 1 to 100. But for multiples of three print “Fizz” instead of the number and for the multiples of five print “Buzz”. For numbers which are multiples of both three and five print “FizzBuzz”

Aside from explicitly stating "Hey, encapsulate IF/ELIF/ELSE statements in a FOR loop", FizzBuzz doesn't seem too analytical--am I wrong?